Chesusrice's Grater

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
no, i think it was purposeful as we have some real characters around here who don't partake.

desertdude comes to mind.

chesus tries to say he doesn't smoke or grow, but he's just being too paranoid.
i'm with CR..i don't smoke or grow..i live in a police state and it would be a felony to do either..any pics related to myself are a test in how to upload content at riu..we all know girls can't grow.
 

Sand4x105

Well-Known Member
i'm with CR..i don't smoke or grow..i live in a police state and it would be a felony to do either..any pics related to myself are a test in how to upload content at riu..we all know girls can't grow.
The difference is when you say it it sounds farce like...
When Chessesse's says it... It sounds like he has no clue...
He's a good actor if he grows... cause well ....
His typical point of view is of someone [like me 15 years ago] ...
That is OK if you grow... but don't bring that illegal sheiot around me....

If you don't grow Cheezie... or Desert Dude...
Why hang out with stoners?
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
The difference is when you say it it sounds farce like...
When Chessesse's says it... It sounds like he has no clue...
He's a good actor if he grows... cause well ....
His typical point of view is of someone [like me 15 years ago] ...
That is OK if you grow... but don't bring that illegal sheiot around me....

If you don't grow Cheezie... or Desert Dude...
Why hang out with stoners?
Google of Ron turtle fucker Paul led me here.
And despite what buck says. I don't grow
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
i had an epiphany last night about republicans after talking with see4, bucky and eche.

i figured them out.

small goverment = do what the fuck they want no regulation

law of the land = the bible

so you see republicans why this would never work:

1. you've already shown yourselves to be untrustworthy which is why we need to regulate your asses

2. a mythical dead guys teachings from a bazillion years ago doesn't apply in this time and age
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
While the information they quoted from the "DEA agent" may be incorrect, I didn't hear Fox confirm it as deadly. While the tone is obviously anti-pot, it's hard to call it a lie. If quoting (without fact checking or disputing) a government official who happens to be lying is the new litmus test for a news agencies, I think we can come up with PLENTY on MSNBC. Maybe not about cannabis, but on a plethora of other subjects.

What a wonderful excuse for diversion, misinformation and half truth. Quote an un named source but give that un named source credability by saying his is a DEA agent, but claim that FOX is doing nothing but reporting the news. Fair and balanced? Where is the complementing quote from NORML, or any scientist or scientific study? FOX is NOT a news organization by any measure, it is a mouthpiece for those with an agenda and we all know that those who use FOX as their primary source of news are less in formed and more believe untruths more than those who use any other source - including MSNBC.
 

beenthere

New Member
What a wonderful excuse for diversion, misinformation and half truth. Quote an un named source but give that un named source credability by saying his is a DEA agent, but claim that FOX is doing nothing but reporting the news. Fair and balanced? Where is the complementing quote from NORML, or any scientist or scientific study? FOX is NOT a news organization by any measure, it is a mouthpiece for those with an agenda and we all know that those who use FOX as their primary source of news are less in formed and more believe untruths more than those who use any other source - including MSNBC.
Where do you get your news canndo, give us a couple of sources, please.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
constituents voted that's who..want small government? fail..you don't want RULES and LAWS..which is what society lives by.
I dont want the government to redistribute wealth and use the taxpayers for it's social experiments...

Is that unreasonable?
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
What a wonderful excuse for diversion, misinformation and half truth. Quote an un named source but give that un named source credability by saying his is a DEA agent, but claim that FOX is doing nothing but reporting the news. Fair and balanced? Where is the complementing quote from NORML, or any scientist or scientific study? FOX is NOT a news organization by any measure, it is a mouthpiece for those with an agenda and we all know that those who use FOX as their primary source of news are less in formed and more believe untruths more than those who use any other source - including MSNBC.
Lol, what a complete load of shit. You apparently excuse NBC, ABC, CBS, HUFF POST, NY TIMES, WASH POST, LA TIMES, MSNBC and countless others for doing the exact same fucking thing with Harry Reid's lie about Romney not paying taxes for 10 years. Unnamed source with an outrageous lie, splashed across the MSM without ANY fact checking.

But, those bastions of higher journalism (vomit) are excused for some reason I'm sure you'll manufacture. And the constant parroting of ANYTHING the administration claims, until it's exposed as horseshit, doesn't completely invalidate that steaming pile of yours I just quoted?

Like Politifact rating Obama's "You can keep..." promise, true in 2008. Then rating Romneys ACCURATE claim of dropped policies false. Now, it's their lie of the year without any mention of their previous position.

There was plenty of evidence it was a lie out of the gate. We now know Obama was being told by his own people it was false as he was repeating it over 23 times. But, your precious MSM couldn't squawk loud and long enough in support of the claim.

You are delusional if you think ANY of the major media sources you view, are in any way more fair and balanced than Fox. You just hear what you want to hear.

I wasn't defending Fox, I was just refuting the claim they had affirmed or actually agreed with the source's statement, not just presented it. I know they're full of shit. The difference is you think your sources aren't JUST as full of shit.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Lol, what a complete load of shit. You apparently excuse NBC, ABC, CBS, HUFF POST, NY TIMES, WASH POST, LA TIMES, MSNBC and countless others for doing the exact same fucking thing with Harry Reid's lie about Romney not paying taxes for 10 years. Unnamed source with an outrageous lie, splashed across the MSM without ANY fact checking.

But, those bastions of higher journalism (vomit) are excused for some reason I'm sure you'll manufacture. And the constant parroting of ANYTHING the administration claims, until it's exposed as horseshit, doesn't completely invalidate that steaming pile of yours I just quoted?

Like Politifact rating Obama's "You can keep..." promise, true in 2008. Then rating Romneys ACCURATE claim of dropped policies false. Now, it's their lie of the year without any mention of their previous position.

There was plenty of evidence it was a lie out of the gate. We now know Obama was being told by his own people it was false as he was repeating it over 23 times. But, your precious MSM couldn't squawk loud and long enough in support of the claim.

You are delusional if you think ANY of the major media sources you view, are in any way more fair and balanced than Fox. You just hear what you want to hear.

I wasn't defending Fox, I was just refuting the claim they had affirmed or actually agreed with the source's statement, not just presented it. I know they're full of shit. The difference is you think your sources aren't JUST as full of shit.
speaking of romney is everyone looking forward to netflix release tomorrow of "Mitt"?..should be awesome behind the scenes..when he realized he lost you can see it devastated him..felt really bad.
 
Top