UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
he made a claim about what happens at certain PPMs. did you miss that?you are demanding red cite his request for clarification of pada's claim
are you sure you understand what a citation is?
he made a claim about what happens at certain PPMs. did you miss that?you are demanding red cite his request for clarification of pada's claim
are you sure you understand what a citation is?
actually i was referring to the PREVIOUS thread where you trotted out those same bullshit BLS numbers and i demonstrated conclusively that their prices were pure crap.it's just amazing that scientists don't consult with you before going off and doing science stuff.
i slinked off so hard that you haven't set foot in there since i posted actual BLS prices versus store prices last night.
dumb fuck.
Actually, it exceeds the contribution of co2 by 49900%. co2 plays an insignificant role.Yes water vapour contributes significantely to global warming, it exacerbates the added CO2 by humans, it does not mitigate it or act exclusively.
and the finding backs up the climate models that predicted such events as NASA was finally able to measure in the troposphere with the ARS instrament in 2008
no, pada made a vague claim, red demanded he either cite his claim in specific or Do The Math.he made a claim about what happens at certain PPMs. did you miss that?
you got sauce on that claim?Actually, it exceeds the contribution of co2 by 49900%. co2 plays an insignificant role.
sure ya did, sweetheart.i demonstrated conclusively that their prices were pure crap.
lol.Actually, it exceeds the contribution of co2 by 49900%. co2 plays an insignificant role.
apparently you reading compensation has failed you? (<----not intended as a question)no, pada made a vague claim, red demanded he either cite his claim in specific or Do The Math.
thats a CHALLENGE to an assertion, and a CHALLENGE to an assertion does not require citations, and in fact would be nearly impossible to cite, since it is a demand for evidence
if red had made a substantive assertion about how pada's claim was wrong, then he could be expected to show his work, or cite his claim.
thats not what happened.
*yawn*sure ya did, sweetheart.
BLS has milk listed at $3.687 right now. price at king soopers here in denver?
BLS has a dozen large egss listed at $2.119 right now.
BLS has a pound of bread (16 oz) listed at $1.388.
BLS has bananas at $0.597 per pound.
wooooooooops! turns out reality is...real.
WOAH
good job on declaring victory.*yawn*
you dont really want to start that pissing match again.
i hosed you down and left you dripping with urine last time, and this time i been eating asparagus.
more distraction. pada copy/pasted (from an unknown source) red demanded more information, and you demand red cite his demand for a citation.apparently you reading compensation has failed you? (<----not intended as a question)
of course i declared victory.good job on declaring victory.
now all you need for it to actually happen is for reality to stop being reality.
Are you sure about the "working prototype"? Still no where near as good as my 150% efficient cells. And "development" does not mean "gearing up for production"."Develop" not Invent.
the design already has Proof of Concept and at least one working prototype.
"development" is gearing up for production
Well, I used the numbers YOU posted earlier.you got sauce on that claim?
how can you claim 150% efficiency?Are you sure about the "working prototype"? Still no where near as good as my 150% efficient cells. And "development" does not mean "gearing up for production".
meh, never mind, i was seeing 49900 TIMES, not %.Well, I used the numbers YOU posted earlier.
red claimed nothing happens at a certain PPM.more distraction. pada copy/pasted (from an unknown source) red demanded more information, and you demand red cite his demand for a citation.
you are clinically retarded.
see how he says "basically nothing" happens above a certain PPM?"If CO2 levels rise higher than about 600PPM it starts causing significant changes to the environment" Like what? Basically, nothing.
yeah, maybe you should probably redouble your efforts on disproving the reality i face every time i enter the grocery store.of course i declared victory.
after i finished demolishing your claims, you spammed ad homs, memes and penises then left the discussion.
then much later, youre right back in another discussion making the same arguments as if they had not already been disproved.
yet you have still NEVER cited your original claim, nor has kynes.Well, I used the numbers YOU posted earlier.
Kynes uses Science! it's super effective!yet you have still NEVER cited your original claim, nor has kynes.
kynes, now that you got the pyromaniacal wonder here, you might want to ask him where he got the "hundredfold" claim from.
i really want the LOLs at this point.