Marijuana Cuts Lung Cancer Tumor Growth In Half, Study Shows

buckaroo bonzai

Well-Known Member
bongsmiliebongsmiliebongsmilie
Marijuana Cuts Lung Cancer Tumor Growth In Half, Study Shows


The active ingredient in marijuana cuts tumor growth in common lung cancer in half and significantly reduces the ability of the cancer to spread, say researchers at Harvard University who tested the chemical in both lab and mouse studies.

They say this is the first set of experiments to show that the compound, Delta-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), inhibits EGF-induced growth and migration in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expressing non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Lung cancers that over-express EGFR are usually highly aggressive and resistant to chemotherapy.

THC that targets cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 is similar in function to endocannabinoids, which are cannabinoids that are naturally produced in the body and activate these receptors. The researchers suggest that THC or other designer agents that activate these receptors might be used in a targeted fashion to treat lung cancer.

"The beauty of this study is that we are showing that a substance of abuse, if used prudently, may offer a new road to therapy against lung cancer," said Anju Preet, Ph.D., a researcher in the Division of Experimental Medicine.

Acting through cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2, endocannabinoids (as well as THC) are thought to play a role in variety of biological functions, including pain and anxiety control, and inflammation. Although a medical derivative of THC, known as Marinol, has been approved for use as an appetite stimulant for cancer patients, and a small number of U.S. states allow use of medical marijuana to treat the same side effect, few studies have shown that THC might have anti-tumor activity, Preet says. The only clinical trial testing THC as a treatment against cancer growth was a recently completed British pilot study in human glioblastoma.

In the present study, the researchers first demonstrated that two different lung cancer cell lines as well as patient lung tumor samples express CB1 and CB2, and that non-toxic doses of THC inhibited growth and spread in the cell lines. "When the cells are pretreated with THC, they have less EGFR stimulated invasion as measured by various in-vitro assays," Preet said.

Then, for three weeks, researchers injected standard doses of THC into mice that had been implanted with human lung cancer cells, and found that tumors were reduced in size and weight by about 50 percent in treated animals compared to a control group. There was also about a 60 percent reduction in cancer lesions on the lungs in these mice as well as a significant reduction in protein markers associated with cancer progression, Preet says.

Although the researchers do not know why THC inhibits tumor growth, they say the substance could be activating molecules that arrest the cell cycle. They speculate that THC may also interfere with angiogenesis and vascularization, which promotes cancer growth.

Preet says much work is needed to clarify the pathway by which THC functions, and cautions that some animal studies have shown that THC can stimulate some cancers. "THC offers some promise, but we have a long way to go before we know what its potential is," she said.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070417193338.htm

Harvard Study Finds Cannabis Cuts Tumor Growth In Half In Three Weeks
Posted by Johnny Green at 7:42 AM on August 31, 2013Marijuana Science


Courtesy of The Joint Blog

A Harvard study from 2007 which remains the most comprehensive ever released on THC’s potential to combat tumors found that in just three weeks doses of THC were able to cut lung cancer tumor growth in half in mice subjects, and were able to reduce cancer lesions by even more.

For the study, Harvard researchers tested THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, which is found naturally in cannabis) on cancer cells in labs, and followed that up by studying mice subjects.

The lab demonstration found that doses of THC inhibited growth and spread in the cancer cells; “When the cells are pretreated with THC, they have less EGFR stimulated invasion as measured by various in-vitro assays,” states Anju Preet, PhD, who was one of the researchers for the study.

Following the lab test, researchers dosed mice – which were implanted with human lung cancer cells – with THC, and found that in just three weeks, tumors were reduced in both size and weight by roughly 50% compared to a control group. According to Preet, cancer lesions on the lungs were also reduced – by nearly 60% – and there was as a significant reduction in “protein markers” associated with cancer progression.

Researchers predict that THC had such a positive effect on combating tumors because it activates molecules that arrest the cell cycle, and may also interfere with the processes of angiogenesis and vascularization, which lead to cancer growth.

Over 6 years since its original release, this study remains one of the most important cannabis-related studies ever released.

Source: TheJointBlog.Com
http://www.theweedblog.com/harvard-study-finds-cannabis-cuts-tumor-growth-in-half-in-three-weeks/
 

AirAnt

Well-Known Member
tired of stupid pricks with names like 'anju preet' talking shit about herb.

fuck you anju.
 

AirAnt

Well-Known Member
no he isn't, the entire article is laced with smarmy, psuedo-sly doublespeak. oh here we have this practically free cure for cancer we just happened to find just now, you know, it's just too bad it's a drug of abuse and only shows some promise and we've got a long way to go before anything can be said.

bullshit. academia is filled with mindless cocksuckers just like him who keep running the same goddamn treadmill without making any progress because they're shitheads like anju, talking out his mouth and ass at the same time.
 

buckaroo bonzai

Well-Known Member
tired of stupid pricks with names like 'anju preet' talking shit about herb.
fuck you anju.
no he isn't, the entire article is laced with smarmy, psuedo-sly doublespeak. oh here we have this practically free cure for cancer we just happened to find just now, you know, it's just too bad it's a drug of abuse and only shows some promise and we've got a long way to go before anything can be said.

bullshit. academia is filled with mindless cocksuckers just like him who keep running the same goddamn treadmill without making any progress because they're shitheads like anju, talking out his mouth and ass at the same time.
Well.......it STILL keeps lung cancer down.......
-no matter what you think-:blsmoke:
 

AirAnt

Well-Known Member
yeah good, attack the person who points out rotten hypocrisy and jump to the defense of someone who lies to your face with every fucking sentence.

this is planet retard after all, and you are right at home.
 

AirAnt

Well-Known Member
it was there, you weren't paying attention. black and white, plain as day, clear as crystal.

 

AirAnt

Well-Known Member
everything this human turd is saying is couched in duplicitous double-speak. Too much wordage?

half of everything he says is straight from the governments 'anti-marijuana handbook 101' and you jerks want to sit around applauding him like he's some great humanitarian for it.

no, stop. stop fucking handing out awards for half-measure concessions. stop applauding these assclowns who feed you bullshit and lies until you're so full of it you can't tell where it's being shoveled in from anymore.

from either you or anju-boy I'd love to hear how a non-addictive substance with no long term negative physical or psychological effects can be classified as one of 'abuse' unless you are blindly following spoon-fed government doctine.

Fuck, it's not really worth posting this shit anymore. I don't have some kind of magical mental jumper cables to force you to actually have to use your own fucking brain for yourselves. I'm out.
 

buckaroo bonzai

Well-Known Member
tired of stupid pricks with names like 'anju preet' talking shit about herb.fuck you anju.
no he isn't, the entire article is laced with smarmy, psuedo-sly doublespeak. oh here we have this practically free cure for cancer we just happened to find just now, you know, it's just too bad it's a drug of abuse and only shows some promise and we've got a long way to go before anything can be said.

bullshit. academia is filled with mindless cocksuckers just like him who keep running the same goddamn treadmill without making any progress because they're shitheads like anju, talking out his mouth and ass at the same time.
yeah good, attack the person who points out rotten hypocrisy and jump to the defense of someone who lies to your face with every fucking sentence.

this is planet retard after all, and you are right at home.
it was there, you weren't paying attention. black and white, plain as day, clear as crystal.

everything this human turd is saying is couched in duplicitous double-speak. Too much wordage?

half of everything he says is straight from the governments 'anti-marijuana handbook 101' and you jerks want to sit around applauding him like he's some great humanitarian for it.

no, stop. stop fucking handing out awards for half-measure concessions. stop applauding these assclowns who feed you bullshit and lies until you're so full of it you can't tell where it's being shoveled in from anymore.

from either you or anju-boy I'd love to hear how a non-addictive substance with no long term negative physical or psychological effects can be classified as one of 'abuse' unless you are blindly following spoon-fed government doctine.

Fuck, it's not really worth posting this shit anymore. I don't have some kind of magical mental jumper cables to force you to actually have to use your own fucking brain for yourselves. I'm out.
honestly you deserve some sort of punishment for taking this long to realize.
........"talking shit about herb"......

I saw ONE line quoted by the researcher.......???
No where in this article did i see anything about "talking shit about erb"......?
Most of the article was about the efficacy of treating "lung cancer" with THC and its affects

One line the guy says ""The beauty of this study is that we are showing that a substance of abuse, if used prudently, may offer a new road to therapy against lung cancer," said Anju Preet, Ph.D., a researcher in the Division of Experimental Medicine."----------->thats it numbnut

........"the entire article is laced with smarmy, psuedo-sly doublespeak".......
--You use your words incorrectly ant man:lol:


Duplicitous ""doublespeak"" .....hahahaha:lol:

The WHOLE article was about ""THC"" retarded antman agro :-xboy--do your homework.....im not sure you ":shock:read:shock:" so well

....at least comprehension skills:dunce:

You took the WHOLE article out of context based on one line that said "a substance of abuse"

The article was about THC....and how it has an effect on lung cancer....ant shit....:lol:

Until now they have only been saying CBD has efficacy towards cancer and tumors......read it again ant dude

Its about THC----
-----not dr preet.....




....."it was there, you weren't paying attention. black and white, plain as day, clear as crystal.".......

Yeah read what i replied ---^^^^^^^------>YOU didn't get it antboy

Sounded by your small sounding avatar and the BIG words you tried to articulate [FAIL] with you didnt see the "crystal clear msg"

......"duplicitous double-speak. Too much wordage?"......

I think the article was right to the point......

A ""Harvard"" ----->'study'

You obviously are uNkLe bUcKs nephew or another fuckin agro:dunce:idiot in here stepping into threads you don't really read

Peace:peace:ant dude......quite smokingbongsmiliehydro and synthetic nutes
Its goin to your small ant head:evil:

Which is obvious that it is by your post-:rolleyes:

Your really NOT as smart or 'clever' as you:shock:look 'antface'....at least from THIS side of the screen....after the willy wonka image i imagine you look like him to some degree.....jmo

....you look pretty small tho

At least your angry little brain-
 
Last edited:

AirAnt

Well-Known Member
if you feel the need to lace your point with a multitude of emoticons...

you've probably not got much of one.

well i'm going to take my leave of you idiots now, and I will punish you by placing you on ignore because you are not valid, interesting people with meritable thoughts but spiteful, small-minded feces-flingers who belong in a cage and not an internet forum.
 

AirAnt

Well-Known Member
something to be said for those who fail to see the truth for themselves

then upon having it revealed to them, choose to attack the source of revelation

and the thing that is to be said is 'fuck you'.
 

buckaroo bonzai

Well-Known Member
if you feel the need to lace your point with a multitude of emoticons...

you've probably not got much of one.

well i'm going to take my leave of you idiots now, and I will punish you by placing you on ignore because you are not valid, interesting people with meritable thoughts but spiteful, small-minded feces-flingers who belong in a cage and not an internet forum.
"Lace my point"....??
The 'point' was >WHAT<was in the article.....

NOT what 'YOU' >thought< dr preet thought-:lol::lol::lol:
Detective obvious----(NOT)-----[fail!]

(And you think the 'idiots' are on 'this' side of the screen)--hahaha:lol:

Ur the one thats NOt ----'valid':sleep:

'Spiteful'----??
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Thats your reply when i point out >THE<>'truth' to you....???
:lol: hahahahahahaha

Wonder what anyone:shock:else who read:shock:this would say/think about >your<>>>>> 'perceptions' ---of the article:dunce:

And ur shit slinging name calling duplicitous doublespeak (?)
--ant BRAIN

aGAIN>>YOU<didn't get it.....:confused:<-----u

Show me all dr preets hateful 'duplicitous:lol:doublespeak'......?
.....one line-----there is NONE

Dingleberry-


something to be said for those who fail to see the truth for themselves

then upon having it revealed to them, choose to attack the source of revelation

and the thing that is to be said is 'fuck you'.


Well now whos getting 'spiteful' and slinging feces?:cuss::-x:evil:

--an 'ant' brain retard with no reading comprehension skills.....:dunce:
(this is fun!!)


I think your just stirring the shit pot here-:cuss:

.....and so far from this side of the screen 'you' seem to be the ONLY turd that has floated to the surface thru the duplicitous doublespeak swirl of anger Gene wilder aka antman

'Air ant'......that stands for : 'Ai' (artificial intelligence) Rant

Right? ...makes sense to me uNKLe bUcKs nephew-

You still missed the point that THC is good for lung cancer dingleballs.....antman-antbrain

The article speaks volumes about 'smoking' the plant (THC) antbrain--

Glad ur gonna ignore 'us'....(me myself and i)

I-n-I ant bro

You get what you give

Oh and i looked at your posting content and most of it in ALL your posts was just more of the same......

Smarmy smart ass dingleberry comments-
No REAL intelligent content/comments


You seem like your the 'idiot'.....from this side of the screen:wall::lol::lol::lol:

....i think you get 'emoticons' better than werdz-antbrain:blsmoke:


Thanks for the 'punishment':lol::lol::lol: Now move along to another thread 'ant' -brain

Didnt you know(?) --"Those who throw dirt .....'lose' ground"

And shit:-xtoo:lol:

 
Last edited:
Top