desert dude
Well-Known Member
Actually, no. There was an eyewitness to Trayvon pummeling Zimmerman "MMA style".
Travan Martin all over again??
- Thread starter NLXSK1
- Start date
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
who?
martin?
desert dude
Well-Known Member
You should have watched the trial. John XXX, can't remember the guy's name, testified that he watched from his second floor balcony as Martin pummeled Zimmerman. Not to mention the physical evidence which was entirely one sided and corroborated that Zimmerman was the only one injured. There wasn't a mark on Trayvon save his knuckles which were scraped on Zimmeman's skull.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
You were talking about you could grow bacteria to cure us. Now you've changed it to what can infect you. Any bacteria injected is likely to harm you. You can't keep them straight, but you think you're qualified to practice medicine. Just as any loon wanting to make a buck would do under your proposal. No thankyou, I prefer a licensed doctor.
SmokeyDan
Well-Known Member
If that is the case then there is absolutely, by the same reasoning, no evidence that Zimmerman did anything illegal.
We have to have some proof to lock people up.
Unfortunately for your argument there is some evidence that Zimmerman's head was bounced off a curb and something broke his nose.
His story is plausible and there was no evidence to suggest otherwise.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
AND... There was an eye witness to the attempted murder who testified at the trial that he saw Martin beating Zimmerman "MMA style". The trial was utterly lop-sided, and was only conducted to calm the lefties who demanded white-hispanic blood.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
yeah, the cops are usually very trustworthy and never tell tall tales to cover their own asses.
we should just take their word as is and look at no eyewitness accounts that contradict their concocted stories.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
how about martin?
did he have a right to defend himself against a creepy stranger following him in the dark?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
he never made any testimony anywhere near what you are claiming though is the problem.
i wonder why an admitted white supremacist like you would want to lie about a detail like that?
desert dude
Well-Known Member
What was his testimony, Buck?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
he couldn't confirm who was who or even that anyone was hitting anyone. he saw colors and "arm movements going downward".
that is nowhere near your claim. but nice try.
i'm sure your aryan brotherhood friends are all very proud of you for keeping on top of this one.
Choo
Well-Known Member
My 2 cents on the Michael Brown shooting.........What happened at the 7-11 and the struggle in the police car are all moot points if Michael Brown was shot with his hands in the air 30ft from the cop car. If that is true (and I tend to believe it is) then the cop is a murderer plain and simple. It does not excuse the lawlessness in Ferguson however. That is a different matter.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Well I am pretty sure the cop didnt try to drag him into the car and the cop was treated for head injuries and there was a shot fired inside the cop car.
I am pretty sure he wasnt asking for donations for UNICEF...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
in other words, you believe the cop's story no matter what despite the multiple contradictory eyewitness accounts.
makes perfect sense for someone like you, especially considering your quotes in my sig.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
His hands were in the air as he was turning as the Officer was firing.
In your mind and many others you see it as
"he had his hands in the air and then the Cop drew a bead on him as he was begging for his life and as the cop leered.....He shot him"
That aint what happened and even his freind said so
earnest_voice
Well-Known Member
Please cite these contradictory accounts from someone not a convicted or wanted felon.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
I created this post and pointed out that if the cop shot a person running away it was murder.
Too bad your braincells are so sodden with alcohol you cannot keep that thought in your head for a couple of pages of posts...
The guy WHO JUST ROBBED A 7-11 was not exactly a model citizen...
desert dude
Well-Known Member
His statement to the cops on the night of the shooting was that Trayvon was doing the ground and pound "MMA style" on Zimmerman. Considering that there was not a single mark on Trayvon, except the knuckles he skinned up on Z' head, and Zimmerman had multiple lacerations on the back of his head and a broken nose there is only one conclusion a non-racist can draw: it was Martin trying to beat Zimmerman to death. Fittingly, that is what the jury concluded, unanimously.
That of course is not the conclusion you drew, but I covered your preconceived judgement two sentences up.
earnest_voice
Well-Known Member
http://www.scribd.com/doc/236913666/Michael-Brown-Police-Report
The document is the incident report from Ferguson police on the robbery of the convenience store. There is no question it is Brown and Johnson, they are positively ID'd by multiple independent witnesses and time-stamped video surveillance footage. States the store owner intends to press charges.
It mentions the Shooting (3pgs), incident number #12391 and establishes a timeline for the events, as logged by a supervisor. States 4-6 shots were fired.
The full report for the shooting isn't available as yet, i assume, due to the ongoing FBI investigation.
Dorian Johnson has yet to be charged for his role in the robbery.
The officer who killed brown fired from a distance of 30ft. X26 taser can deploy effectively at 35ft. Not sure if he was equipped with one but it would seem excessive force was used. If, he did have a less lethal option why wasn't it employed initially?
While the office might not have been aware of the blokes role in the robbery, which seems weird given the clear description that was put out over the radio and documented in the report, I think the fact the two had just committed a robbery would have factored into the way they responded to the officer.
I mean should things have gone another way and the two detained for an ID check etc without incident they would've been identified pretty quickly as suspects in the robbery.
The document is the incident report from Ferguson police on the robbery of the convenience store. There is no question it is Brown and Johnson, they are positively ID'd by multiple independent witnesses and time-stamped video surveillance footage. States the store owner intends to press charges.
It mentions the Shooting (3pgs), incident number #12391 and establishes a timeline for the events, as logged by a supervisor. States 4-6 shots were fired.
The full report for the shooting isn't available as yet, i assume, due to the ongoing FBI investigation.
Dorian Johnson has yet to be charged for his role in the robbery.
The officer who killed brown fired from a distance of 30ft. X26 taser can deploy effectively at 35ft. Not sure if he was equipped with one but it would seem excessive force was used. If, he did have a less lethal option why wasn't it employed initially?
While the office might not have been aware of the blokes role in the robbery, which seems weird given the clear description that was put out over the radio and documented in the report, I think the fact the two had just committed a robbery would have factored into the way they responded to the officer.
I mean should things have gone another way and the two detained for an ID check etc without incident they would've been identified pretty quickly as suspects in the robbery.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
he actually said no such thing, but your allies in the aryan brotherhood i'm sure appreciate your vigilance.