abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
I asked you a 'yes or no' question. I'm trying to ascertain if you are saying what I think you are saying before I explicate it despite that you have distorted two of my arguments in the last several posts.
it's kinda like moving all of iowa's cornfields to south dakota, while also moving south dakota's wheatfields to north dakota. then taking north dakota's rye and sorghum fields and moving them to manitoba. and so on.Stick to science, the stakes are high.
How high? where's the science to back this up?
Thanks for not moving Iowa's corn to Minnesota. Anything Iowan can stay out!it's kinda like moving all of iowa's cornfields to south dakota, while also moving south dakota's wheatfields to north dakota. then taking north dakota's rye and sorghum fields and moving them to manitoba. and so on.
or think of it as taking that coastal highway, picking it all up, and moving it over just a couple feet.
you can take care of that for us when you're not busy repeating retarded talking points from deniers, right?
oman, I read the first two paragraphs and thought, look, Buck is making a post without attacking, then you did....it's kinda like moving all of iowa's cornfields to south dakota, while also moving south dakota's wheatfields to north dakota. then taking north dakota's rye and sorghum fields and moving them to manitoba. and so on.
or think of it as taking that coastal highway, picking it all up, and moving it over just a couple feet.
you can take care of that for us when you're not busy repeating retarded talking points from deniers, right?
"I didn't say that!" ini can't believe i'm even trying to talk sense into people who are so monstrously retarded that they think the ice caps are actually growing.
how do you have a debate with someone who refuses to accept reality itself?
sure, the iowans with the corn harvesters will just trade the south dakotans for their combines. the people themselves who know how to grow and harvest the crops switch places too.Why do we have to move the fields? Can't we just change what we grow in those fields?
I know right. I even saw a guy that thinks we will have to move fields from Iowa to SD if we want to grow corn there.i can't believe i'm even trying to talk sense into people who are so monstrously retarded that they think the ice caps are actually growing.
how do you have a debate with someone who refuses to accept reality itself?
Or the corn farmer grows something different that will grow in this new climate that is coming.... how long do we have anyway?sure, the iowans with the corn harvesters will just trade the south dakotans for their combines. the people themselves who know how to grow and harvest the crops switch places too.
life goes on as normal with no financial or humanitarian impacts whatsoever.
simple!
i'm sure it all makes sense in your soupy, retarded head.
you're right, crops don't respond to temperatures or climate conditions whatsoever. everyone can just stay in place and keep growing the same crops despite changes in climate.I know right. I even saw a guy that thinks we will have to move fields from Iowa to SD if we want to grow corn there.
sounds like you've got it all figured out, princess.Or the corn farmer grows something different that will grow in this new climate that is coming.... how long do we have anyway?
Are you accusing me of taking this stance after I had your back explaining why surface area can increase while volume decreases?"I didn't say that!" in
5
4
3
2
...
NASA told you fields would have to be moved in order to grow? Can't grow corn here, the corn fields are somewhere else. Bring me that field where they grow corn and then we'll talk.sounds like you've got it all figured out, princess.
better go tell NASA to stop worrying about all this.
Aw, you had my back...Are you accusing me of taking this stance after I had your back explaining why surface area can increase while volume decreases?
If you are talking about someone else, then nevermind.
no, NASA warned of the effects of 400 PPM of CO2 on temperatures, a level not seen in the last 800,000 years which we have suddenly achieved in the last 100.NASA told you fields would have to be moved in order to grow?
reductio ad absurdumNASA told you fields would have to be moved in order to grow?
Ah, this is exactly what I've come to expect from you when you step on your dick.Aw, you had my back...
how nice of you...
That totally makes up for appeals to absurdity and distortions of my arguments. You should just stick to calling me unstable because I'm a combat veteran. It works because all you have to do is piss me off and then say "Look, you're pissed off, you must be unstable"
fuck you
Oh, be sure to declare victory before you say bye...Ah, this is exactly what I've come to expect from you when you step on your dick.
Have a good one man. I see we are at that point where it's nothing more than verbal abuse.
every lie and idiotic statement out of your idiot mouth is verbal abuse to those of us who are not idiots and can see what you're doing.Ah, this is exactly what I've come to expect from you when you step on your dick.
Have a good one man. I see we are at that point where it's nothing more than verbal abuse.
how are we supposed to know that he defeated us if he doesn't declare victory?Oh, be sure to declare victory before you say bye...
All you had was distortions anyway.