Click on his avatar.
Now click it again & go to the "postings" tab.
Viola.
Now click it again & go to the "postings" tab.
Viola.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/is-this-cal-mag-deficiency.848144/#post-10998360How do I find op other post?
Thank you.Click on his avatar.
Now click it again & go to the "postings" tab.
Viola.
Thank you. I am almost positive it is under water or dry spots. You can tell in some of the pics. I had an outdoor plant that got dry spot and it would not take water. I went to dig it up and flush it and found it right in the center. It starts out looking like a nitrogen deficiency and then start to look like a magnesium deficiency and then dead leaves.https://www.rollitup.org/t/is-this-cal-mag-deficiency.848144/#post-10998360
https://www.rollitup.org/t/help-please.847868/#post-10995092
The first is the thread I described above.
yea sorry about the multiple threads that are related thing I made this thread just because I was afraid that flushing (the most common suggestion) was a troll idea and wanted to know if it is actually a safe thing to do.I suggested either 1/2-1tsp/gal epsom salt or flushing would have more probability of improvement than using a vitamin to give mn.
I think that's what led to this thread. Your question makes perfect sense. It just leads back to the other thread(s).
There is an optimum ratio between ca and mg. I've read too much mg can interfere with uptake of ca. It may work the other way. If you have an mg def and give ca when it isn't needed, that may inhibit mg uptake (which you're already fighting).Now i'm wondering why the epsom salt was so much more effective than the liquid cal mag I had tried earlier? I gave both in roughly the same ppm range but only the salt seemed to improve the plants condition.