natro.hydro
Well-Known Member
Think you are confused about this thread. No one is outraged except ya boy rush.I don't think that's the problem at all. I think people are just looking for something to be outraged about....as usual.
Blacks would have the EXACT same reaction if a white dude was cast as John Shaft instead of Samuel L. Jackson, and they'd be justified as well.
Original John Shaft....
CORRECT version of John Shaft V2.0
WRONG version of John Shaft
[Insert any white dude here]
It's not rocket science people...
I think there is a collective head shaking going on about the amount of resistance this is meeting.
I do not know much about shaft and not going to pretend to but when I wikipedia'd it it said and I quote
"Shaft is a 1971 American blaxploitation film directed by Gordon Parks, released by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. An action film with elements of film noir, Shaft tells the story of a private detective, John Shaft, who travels through Harlem and to the Italian mobneighborhoods in order to find the missing daughter of a mobster"
So you will notice the word blaxploitation, had to look that one up to just to be sure
Blaxploitation or blacksploitation is a film genre that emerged in the United States in the 1970s. It is considered an ethnic subgenre of the general category of exploitation films. Blaxploitation films were originally made specifically for an urban black audience, although the genre's audience appeal soon broadened across racial and ethnic lines.
So yet again your example has betrayed your argument