Gage Green Group Info Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
chuck estevez

chuck estevez

Well-Known Member
then, he is worried about heavy metals, but post a link to this stuff????

(quote) poopbreath
who didn't believe marijuana could uptake heavy metals into the leaves flowers and seeds?

mgda can be used for flushing to remove cadmium and other heavy metals from soil:

http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/20357.pdf
but his link isn't even for soil
Chelating Agents of a New
Generation as an Alternative to
Conventional Chelators for Heavy Metal
Ions Removal from Different Waste Waters
Dorota Kołodyńska


Produced from BASF, methylglycinediacetic acid (MGDA) is produced from glycine. MGDA has a high rate of biodegradation >68%, but unlike many other chelating agents can degrade without the assistance of adapted bacteria. Additionally, unlike EDDS or IDS, MGDA can withstand higher temperatures while maintaining a high stability as well as the entire pH range. As a result, the chelating strength of MGDA is stronger than many commercial chelating agents.

and the safety of trilon mgda? http://site.saveoncitric.com/trilon_m_info.pdf

and the cost? $10.49 for 1 lb
 
chuck estevez

chuck estevez

Well-Known Member
MR.POOP, I am going to post this again, this is from way back when I first got into this thread. READ IT, TRY AND UNDERSTAND IT.

CONCLUSIONS
Cadmium in low concentrations most likely is a normal constituent
of all plant tissues. The concentration in the tissue is determined
by the inherent ability of a plant species to absorb cadmiumCADMIUM IN PLANTS G25
and by the cadmium concentration in the environment. At low
levels of cadmium in soils, differences in cadmium content among
plant species commonly are greater than differences in amounts
of cadmium in the soils where the plants grew. Beyond certain
background amounts of cadmium in soils, the cadmium content of
plant tissue tends to increase with increased concentrations of
cadmium in the soil.
Airborne cadmium, originating in emissions from the combustion
of hydrocarbons or from certain industrial processes, may
enter the soils and be absorbed by plants, or may be deposited on
the surface of plants in particulate matter, until very high levels
of cadmium are accumulated by the plant. There appears to be no
natural means by which cadmium is eliminated from plant tissue,
and no cultural practice has been found effective in reducing or
preventing the absorption of cadmium by plants

read the source of the link I got this from, PLEASE
http://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/1314g/report.pdf
 
TonightYou

TonightYou

Well-Known Member
chuck estevez said:
MR.POOP, I am going to post this again, this is from way back when I first got into this thread. READ IT, TRY AND UNDERSTAND IT.

CONCLUSIONS
Cadmium in low concentrations most likely is a normal constituent
of all plant tissues. The concentration in the tissue is determined
by the inherent ability of a plant species to absorb cadmiumCADMIUM IN PLANTS G25
and by the cadmium concentration in the environment. At low
levels of cadmium in soils, differences in cadmium content among
plant species commonly are greater than differences in amounts
of cadmium in the soils where the plants grew. Beyond certain
background amounts of cadmium in soils, the cadmium content of
plant tissue tends to increase with increased concentrations of
cadmium in the soil.
Airborne cadmium, originating in emissions from the combustion
of hydrocarbons or from certain industrial processes, may
enter the soils and be absorbed by plants, or may be deposited on
the surface of plants in particulate matter, until very high levels
of cadmium are accumulated by the plant. There appears to be no
natural means by which cadmium is eliminated from plant tissue,
and no cultural practice has been found effective in reducing or
preventing the absorption of cadmium by plants

read the source of the link I got this from, PLEASE
http://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/1314g/report.pdf
Click to expand...
He may read it, the better question is will he understand it?
 
purplelicious

purplelicious

Well-Known Member
chuck estevez said:
MR.POOP, I am going to post this again, this is from way back when I first got into this thread. READ IT, TRY AND UNDERSTAND IT.

CONCLUSIONS
Cadmium in low concentrations most likely is a normal constituent
of all plant tissues. The concentration in the tissue is determined
by the inherent ability of a plant species to absorb cadmiumCADMIUM IN PLANTS G25
and by the cadmium concentration in the environment. At low
levels of cadmium in soils, differences in cadmium content among
plant species commonly are greater than differences in amounts
of cadmium in the soils where the plants grew. Beyond certain
background amounts of cadmium in soils, the cadmium content of
plant tissue tends to increase with increased concentrations of
cadmium in the soil.
Airborne cadmium, originating in emissions from the combustion
of hydrocarbons or from certain industrial processes, may
enter the soils and be absorbed by plants, or may be deposited on
the surface of plants in particulate matter, until very high levels
of cadmium are accumulated by the plant. There appears to be no
natural means by which cadmium is eliminated from plant tissue,
and no cultural practice has been found effective in reducing or
preventing the absorption of cadmium by plants

read the source of the link I got this from, PLEASE
http://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/1314g/report.pdf
Click to expand...

Anyone who says they do not flush based on your information posted is a fodder brain. You are taking something said by someone who never grew a marijuana plant. You might have never grown one either if you don't flush. Or maybe you grow them for rope? That is the only good thing to use cannabis for that hasn't been flushed. You might have never even smoke weed, hence your closed minded observation of reality.
 
Last edited:
mr mustache

mr mustache

Well-Known Member
I just flushed. But there was a floater so I had to flush again :(

You guys STILL talking about this? Lol.....Okaaaay.

We had previously talked of me failing the Forum x chem king tester as I ended up with that bongload covered plant. Well I just can't fail it and in fact will go as far to call grower error on that one plant. It was in a different tent and was kinda crammed in a corner thus not receiving as much light as it should have.

In the main room that is done today/this weekend I have 3 plants that are the exact same pheno (smell and look are VERY distinct) and they are on track for being average to above average yielders. There is a second pheno that is in a 10 gallon pot and BEASTING.

It may be the most resinous plant I've ever grown. and in my top 5 for favorite smell/taste (red kool aid. period) Literally no room for any more trichs. Just blanketed and the buds have a very nice pink/lavender hue to them. Have some killer pics and I will def post this weekend.

But yeah. I'm gonna chalk the one plant up to me because the rest are just killin it.
 
TonightYou

TonightYou

Well-Known Member
purplelicious said:
Anyone who says they do not flush based on your information posted in a fodder brain. You are taking something said by someone who never grew a marijuana plat. You might have never grown one either if you don't flush. Or maybe you grow them for rope? That is the only good thing to use cannabis that hasn't been flushed. You might have never even smoke weed, hence your closed minded observation of reality.
Click to expand...
This is probably the most non sequitur you've posted to date.

Having a hard time stringing words and sentences together?
 
mr mustache

mr mustache

Well-Known Member
One more thing. I have a "black cherry chem" from irie genetics 7 weeks in flower. This thing is Going OFF with huge sparkly chem-cherry buds.

I did a lil more research on it and found the "chem" in it is GGG Daybreaker. Makes me want the pure daybreaker.
 
chuck estevez

chuck estevez

Well-Known Member
purplelicious said:
Anyone who says they do not flush based on your information posted is a fodder brain. You are taking something said by someone who never grew a marijuana plant. You might have never grown one either if you don't flush. Or maybe you grow them for rope? That is the only good thing to use cannabis for that hasn't been flushed. You might have never even smoke weed, hence your closed minded observation of reality.
Click to expand...
the best part of you ran down your mom's ass crack

 
TonightYou

TonightYou

Well-Known Member
purplelicious said:
I have made more of a positive contribution to this thread in three days than you in three years.
Click to expand...
Oh really? You've done strain reviews? Posted pictures of grows? Help identify problems?

Wow, you are a tad delusional on top of being stupid. Any chance you ate paint chips as a child?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top