Is sea level rising?

[Dr Kynes]

We're talking about climate science kkkynes. Forbes is out, they have published libel against climate scientists. Forbes has absolutely no value to any discussion regarding climate science.

next

well so are a great many scientific journals as well, since they are (as you have asserted many times) "infiltrated by the baddies"

when the argument can only revolve around documents you approve, youre sure to win!

too bad youre an idiot who thinks slaves were volunteers and "The Party For Marxist Unification" wasnt a marxist organization.

 

[abandonconflict]

well so are a great many scientific journals as well, since they are (as you have asserted many times) "infiltrated by the baddies"

when the argument can only revolve around documents you approve, youre sure to win!

We're talking about climate science kkkynes. Try linking something peer reviewed.

 

[Saulamus]

We're talking about climate science kkkynes. Try linking something peer reviewed.

LOL!

https://scholar.google.com/
www.nature.com/nature/
www.sciencemag.org

Some places you can find journal articles you wouldn't have to pay to read.

 

[Padawanbater2]

when the argument can only revolve around documents you approve, youre sure to win!

It's not who "we approve", it's what the scientific community approves. Strangely enough, they don't tend to approve unscientific papers that deny anthropogenic climate change.. (less than 30 out of 12,000!) they can't seem to get past that pesky peer review part..

 

[Dr Kynes]

LOL!

https://scholar.google.com/
www.nature.com/nature/
www.sciencemag.org

Some places you can find journal articles you wouldn't have to pay to read.

oh i know well where to find "peer reviewed" material, but sadly, AC has determined that Energy & Ecology, Climate Research, Letters of the Geophysical Union, and many other Peer Reviewed Journals are "infiltrated by the baddies" and are thus invalid.

only sources which support his claims are acceptable

meanwhile he continues to cite blogs, opinion polls, hysterical and patently incorrect screeds from lefty newspaper, and pretty much any asshole who jots down any poorly thought out notion that seems to reinforce his position.

even the IPCC's own reports are dismissed when his claims are found to be unsupported

meanwhile wikipedia's entry on the IPCC report is deemed authoritative, while the text of the report itself is irrelevant, even when discussing the IPCC's own assertions.

AC further insists that slavery is voluntary, and no amount of evidence will sway him from his obstinately, belligerently , deliberately ignorant claim.

he doesnt argue over facts or issues, he right-fights, lies and distorts to artificially inflate his own perverted sense of self-worth

i just like to let some air our of that gasbag every now and then.

ask him to explain his political "philosophy" of "libertarian socialism" if you dare.

it's hilarious to watch him scurry away like a frightened cockroach.

 

[abandonconflict]

oh i know well where to find "peer reviewed" material, but sadly, AC has determined that Energy & Ecology, Climate Research, Letters of the Geophysical Union, and many other Peer Reviewed Journals are "infiltrated by the baddies" and are thus invalid.

I like how you put peer reviewed in quotes. You know where to find "peer reviewed" material. I like the honesty.

 

[Saulamus]

oh i know well where to find "peer reviewed" material, but sadly, AC has determined that Energy & Ecology, Climate Research, Letters of the Geophysical Union, and many other Peer Reviewed Journals are "infiltrated by the baddies" and are thus invalid.

only sources which support his claims are acceptable

meanwhile he continues to cite blogs, opinion polls, hysterical and patently incorrect screeds from lefty newspaper, and pretty much any asshole who jots down any poorly thought out notion that seems to reinforce his position.

even the IPCC's own reports are dismissed when his claims are found to be unsupported

meanwhile wikipedia's entry on the IPCC report is deemed authoritative, while the text of the report itself is irrelevant, even when discussing the IPCC's own assertions.

AC further insists that slavery is voluntary, and no amount of evidence will sway him from his obstinately, belligerently , deliberately ignorant claim.

he doesnt argue over facts or issues, he right-fights, lies and distorts to artificially inflate his own perverted sense of self-worth

i just like to let some air our of that gasbag every now and then.

ask him to explain his political "philosophy" of "libertarian socialism" if you dare.

it's hilarious to watch him scurry away like a frightened cockroach.

I'm gonna guess from your multiple anti-left comments that you are firmly on the right?

I lean pretty left on most subjects, except gun control. My idea of gun control is muzzle awareness and proper trigger squeeze. Otherwise I like a lot of Heinlein's political philosophies and would love it if we were suddenly transported to a Star Trekian utopia. Sure, there would be some who would just leech off of society, but I rather like the idea of not having to worry about working to buy food, pay for housing, or utilities, and could simply work to better myself and the lives of others. But it will never happen, too much greed and selfishness inherent in the human psyche. Which brings me back to most of those on the right.

 

[NoDrama]

OH NOES!!!!!!

I knew someone was going to get a waterworld reference in there somewhere, but damn that was quick.

 

[abandonconflict]

I'm gonna guess from your multiple anti-left comments that you are firmly on the right?

I lean pretty left on most subjects, except gun control. My idea of gun control is muzzle awareness and proper trigger squeeze. Otherwise I like a lot of Heinlein's political philosophies and would love it if we were suddenly transported to a Star Trekian utopia. Sure, there would be some who would just leech off of society, but I rather like the idea of not having to worry about working to buy food, pay for housing, or utilities, and could simply work to better myself and the lives of others. But it will never happen, too much greed and selfishness inherent in the human psyche. Which brings me back to most of those on the right.

They're much quicker to point out my leeching, since I collect a disability check from the VA than they are to point out the billionaires collecting the real welfare.

 

[abandonconflict]

i live on the water. i see no rising.... lol

Where? I'm from Imperial Beach, California and as long as I can remember, there have been yearly projects to dredge up sand in order to widen the tidal zone because of erosion. Despite this, the southern beach front road in town was recently flooded by the normal high tide. It wasn't even storm surge.

 

[UncleBuck]

hey kkkynes, you care to calculate that exponent for us?

http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/gornitz_09/

NASA says thats bullshit.

why are you citing NASA when you don't accept their other findings and claim they are part of a marxist conspiracy?

sea levels have been gradually rising for the last 8000 years due to a LONG TERM WARMING TREND which is part of the natural and unstoppable glacial cycle.

temperatures have been gradually declining over the last 8000 years.

we have undone 5000+ years of coling in a century.

go back to stocking the hostess products at walmart, that task s more at your level.

 

[UncleBuck]

That Al Gore has found his way into your pocket based on a natural phenomenon says something about the ratio of Al's IQ to yours. What's that old maxim, something about a fool and his money?

cool conspiracy, but myself and everyone i know has saved money due to this marxist conspiracy.

 

[Saulamus]

They're much quicker to point out my leeching, since I collect a disability check from the VA than they are to point out the billionaires collecting the real welfare.

My mother received one of those through dad, after she had gone blind from diabetes. They hardly qualify as a check, much less an income. The right can fuck off with their opinion on social welfare, there are very few people who are on it that shouldn't be. It's a pain in the ass to stay on it if you do need it and almost impossible to get it. My mother had lost one of her legs and was partially paralyzed from 2 strokes, but the bastards wouldn't help her out until she was blind. Since the right likes to hide behind the Bible so much, they need to remember what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah. It wasn't the vice and debauchery that doomed them, it was how they treated their young, old, and the ill. Guess who the modern day equivalent is. Think about that the next time the polls open.

 

[abandonconflict]

My mother received one of those through dad, after she had gone blind from diabetes. They hardly qualify as a check, much less an income. The right can fuck off with their opinion on social welfare, there are very few people who are on it that shouldn't be. It's a pain in the ass to stay on it if you do need it and almost impossible to get it. My mother had lost one of her legs and was partially paralyzed from 2 strokes, but the bastards wouldn't help her out until she was blind. Since the right likes to hide behind the Bible so much, they need to remember what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah. It wasn't the vice and debauchery that doomed them, it was how they treated their young, old, and the ill. Guess who the modern day equivalent is. Think about that the next time the polls open.

If voting changed anything, it would be illegal.

 

[UncleBuck]

http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/021513-644725-geoscientists-engineers-dont-believe-in-climate-change.htm

the "consensus" and "vast majority" of those who claim human action is the dominant cause of "climate change":
36%
thats not even a simple majority, yet through the magic of weasel words you transform this into "97%"


even the alarmists who drive the agenda dont believe their own hype.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/02/05/in-their-own-words-climate-alarmists-debunk-their-science/

but they are doing this shit "for our own good" cuz we cant be trusted to make decisions for ourselves, we need a benevolent overseer watching out for our best interests.

i bet you think if you hustle for him real good and get daddy his money, he will promote you to Bottom Bitch

but youre still just a hoe, even if you are charged with keeping the rest of the stable in line.

since you cited NASA before, i'll go head and cite them again for you, princess.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

but hey, walmart stock boy probably knows better than NASA.

 

[UncleBuck]

the issue is, was it caused by human action, or the Long Term Warming Trend we have been in since the end of the last ice age (which is ongoing)

you keep on spamming about this (lol, capitalized) Long Term Warming Trend, but that is complete bullshit. it warmed up starting about 12000 years ago, but then started cooling for the last 8000 years or so.

spamming a lie will not make it true you feckless douchebag.

 

[UncleBuck]

well so are a great many scientific journals as well, since they are (as you have asserted many times) "infiltrated by the baddies"

when the argument can only revolve around documents you approve, youre sure to win!

too bad youre an idiot who thinks slaves were volunteers and "The Party For Marxist Unification" wasnt a marxist organization.

and there it is. marxism.

kkkynes thinks AGW is a marxist conspiracy. priceless.

 

[UncleBuck]

oh i know well where to find "peer reviewed" material, but sadly, AC has determined that Energy & Ecology, Climate Research, Letters of the Geophysical Union, and many other Peer Reviewed Journals are "infiltrated by the baddies" and are thus invalid.

only sources which support his claims are acceptable

meanwhile he continues to cite blogs, opinion polls, hysterical and patently incorrect screeds from lefty newspaper, and pretty much any asshole who jots down any poorly thought out notion that seems to reinforce his position.

even the IPCC's own reports are dismissed when his claims are found to be unsupported

meanwhile wikipedia's entry on the IPCC report is deemed authoritative, while the text of the report itself is irrelevant, even when discussing the IPCC's own assertions.

AC further insists that slavery is voluntary, and no amount of evidence will sway him from his obstinately, belligerently , deliberately ignorant claim.

he doesnt argue over facts or issues, he right-fights, lies and distorts to artificially inflate his own perverted sense of self-worth

i just like to let some air our of that gasbag every now and then.

ask him to explain his political "philosophy" of "libertarian socialism" if you dare.

it's hilarious to watch him scurry away like a frightened cockroach.

tell the new guy about the time you tried to explain away global warming as being caused by termite farts, only to have your theory destroyed by your complete inability to do simple exponents.

if you're too shy, i'll post the quotes of your math meltdown.

 

[Saulamus]

If voting changed anything, it would be illegal.

Case in point.

 

[drolove]

Where? I'm from Imperial Beach, California and as long as I can remember, there have been yearly projects to dredge up sand in order to widen the tidal zone because of erosion. Despite this, the southern beach front road in town was recently flooded by the normal high tide. It wasn't even storm surge.

tampa florida. ill be honest i really dont pay any attention lol. but we havent had any kind of flooding or anything weird there.