InB4 the Eco-Loons

abandonconflict said:
14 of the 15 hottest years in the last 135 years were in this century and 2014 was more unlikely than likely the hottest year of that same timeframe
Click to expand...

Fixed it for you with fact. Or did you miss that in the reports? Might want to stray from the HuffPo once in awhile if you want some unbiased reporting.

When asked whether 2014 was the warmest year so far on record, scientists within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said it’s “more unlikely than likely.” In its annual “state of the climate” analysis, climate experts could say with only 48 percent certainty that 2014 was the warmest year on record.
Click to expand...

Whoopsie.
 
Provide a citation for your claim that scientists have no data regarding climate throughout geological history. The onus of proof is on you for making the claim, since it contradicts a vast body of research. That would be massive denial on your part, by the way.
 
abandonconflict said:
Provide a citation for your claim that scientists have no data regarding climate throughout geological history. The onus of proof is on you for making the claim, since it contradicts a vast body of research. That would be massive denial on your part, by the way.
Click to expand...

Care to show the post where I made the claim? I don't usually provide citations for my opponent's straw man.
 
MuyLocoNC said:
Fixed it for you with fact. Or did you miss that in the reports? Might want to stray from the HuffPo once in awhile if you want some unbiased reporting.



Whoopsie.
Click to expand...

we're only pretty sure that it was the hottest year on record. it could have been the second hottest.

thus hiatus.
 
MuyLocoNC said:
Fixed it for you with fact. Or did you miss that in the reports? Might want to stray from the HuffPo once in awhile if you want some unbiased reporting.



Whoopsie.
Click to expand...

You need to also provide a link or your citation is worthless. I need to find where on the NOAA site this tiny snippet is located so that I can see it in context, otherwise it can't support your argument.
 
abandonconflict said:
Oh, so you admit that it is not only the last 135 years that scientists observe to calculate their conclusions.
Click to expand...

All I ever did was post NASA's claim and put it into perspective against the earth's age. You drew conclusions from there and I told you as much along the way.
 
abandonconflict said:
Most of us don't want to put our heads up our asses in order to gain your perspective.
Click to expand...

Reality that hard for you to wrap your head around?

It gets even better.

Something you can't find on liberal media:
Scientists with NOAA said 2014 only had a 48 percent probability of actually being the warmest year on record, while NASA only gave last year a 38 percent chance of being the warmest.
Click to expand...
 
Now why would it be splashed across the MSM and trumpeted by Democrat politicians and their lemmings all over the internets, when it's only a 38% chance of being the hottest? Hmmm.

You guys make this too easy. You just set yourself back another decade in the fight with this transparent propaganda blowing up in your face.

You see, the small lies and exaggerations fuel disbelief in your agenda's bigger claims. Especially if you don't own them when they're fucking plain as day.
 
abandonconflict said:
I would sure love it if I could find that anywhere. It seems like you made it up. Maybe a link would help.
Click to expand...

Maybe you should have actually read the NASA report before jumping on the bandwagon? You need me to provide a link to NASA's report? I already did that.

Apparently, you didn't read it.
 
Don't be too mad, this entire thread was a trap. I'm just much better at it than you guys.

Score

Muy = 1
Eco-Loons = 0
 
abandonconflict said:
The NASA report said nothing about excluding data prior to 135 years ago.
Click to expand...

Unless this thread gets deleted out of embarrassment, all the libs parroting "hottest year on record" are laughing stocks. You guys are so desperate, you couldn't even read the fackin' report before you started bleating the claim.
 
MuyLocoNC said:
Maybe you should have actually read the NASA report before jumping on the bandwagon? You need me to provide a link to NASA's report? I already did that.

Apparently, you didn't read it.
Click to expand...

why are you citing NASA when you say they are part of the AGW hoax?
 
MuyLocoNC said:
Unless this thread gets deleted out of embarrassment, all the libs parroting "hottest year on record" are laughing stocks. You guys are so desperate, you couldn't even read the fackin' report before you started bleating the claim.
Click to expand...
The NASA report said nothing about excluding data prior to 135 years ago.
 
MuyLocoNC said:
Unless this thread gets deleted out of embarrassment, all the libs parroting "hottest year on record" are laughing stocks. You guys are so desperate, you couldn't even read the fackin' report before you started bleating the claim.
Click to expand...

yeah, being off by a fraction of a degree has really caused us some embarrassment.

imahine how bad it would be if we were off by a full 18 points on simple polling data.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top