UN Arms Treaty implemented without ratification?

[budlover13]

http://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/620223

It appears that some are claiming that the UN Arms Treaty of 2013 can be implemented without ratification by the Senate. This is because of some wording that states when 50+ nations ratify it (which happened in late 2013) it becomes international law in 90 days.

I say no, it cannot without ratification from our elected representatives which is impossible without ammending the Constitution correct?

 

[Farfenugen]

Will fail. Americans will never give up their arms. And there is no way in Hell, that confiscation teams will come around for your guns.

 

[ChesusRice]

http://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/620223

It appears that some are claiming that the UN Arms Treaty of 2013 can be implemented without ratification by the Senate. This is because of some wording that states when 50+ nations ratify it (which happened in late 2013) it becomes international law in 90 days.

I say no, it cannot without ratification from our elected representatives which is impossible without ammending the Constitution correct?

Yes you are correct.
But it runs on sites like Newsmax. Just to rile up the far right and the gullible.
which is usually the same people

 

[budlover13]

Yes you are correct.
But it runs on sites like Newsmax. Just to rile up the far right and the gullible.
which is usually the same people

Personally, I believe that we as a country will face forced disarmament. No idea when, but I do believe it will happen.

 

[budlover13]

Yes you are correct.
But it runs on sites like Newsmax. Just to rile up the far right and the gullible.
which is usually the same people

I'm correct about it being unConstitutional?

 

[ChesusRice]

I'm correct about it being unConstitutional?

Yep

 

[budlover13]

Yep

Good

 

[UncleBuck]

Yes you are correct.
But it runs on sites like Newsmax. Just to rile up the far right and the gullible.
which is usually the same people

hence the existence of this thread.

 

[budlover13]

hence the existence of this thread.

Is it not worthy of discussion.?

 

[UncleBuck]

Is it not worthy of discussion.?

depends.

are you part of a backwoods idaho citizen's militia?

 

[budlover13]

depends.

are you part of a backwoods idaho citizen's militia?

Ummm, nope.

 

[UncleBuck]

Ummm, nope.

then no.

 

[budlover13]

then no.

Ain't no need to be part of a militia to be concerned about my right to keep arms.

 

[ChesusRice]

Ain't no need to be part of a militia to be concerned about my right to keep arms.

It sure helps with the paranoid conspiracy theories though doesn't it

 

[UncleBuck]

Ain't no need to be part of a militia to be concerned about my right to keep arms.

yep, the UN is coming to take your guns.

 

[budlover13]

yep, the UN is coming to take your guns.

All one has to do is read the UN's stance on firearms to know that it is their will to strongly curtail private firearm ownership, to put it lightly.

 

[Harrekin]

I'd love to discuss how it is strange that a US shell organisation like the UN is proposing/potentially enforcing something which is unconstitutional domestically through an "International Law" perspective and how should the US representatives to the UN not be tried for betraying the constitution...

...but I'm on slowdown because certain lefty b*****s can't have a conversation and only want opposing viewpoints shut down and certain mods are b***hboys for certain members and only too happy to oblige.

 

[Rob Roy]

First they break your legs, then they give you crutches. Thanks government!!!

 

[UncleBuck]

I'd love to discuss how it is strange that a US shell organisation like the UN is proposing/potentially enforcing something which is unconstitutional domestically through an "International Law" perspective and how should the US representatives to the UN not be tried for betraying the constitution...

...but I'm on slowdown because certain lefty b*****s can't have a conversation and only want opposing viewpoints shut down and certain mods are b***hboys for certain members and only too happy to oblige.

i love to see really short people get angry. it's entertaining.

 

[Wilksey]

Personally, I believe that we as a country will face forced disarmament. No idea when, but I do believe it will happen.

Maybe an ATTEMPT, but there's NO way in hell they'll get rid of them.

If anything, the attempt would be the catalyst to either get rid of the administration that attempts that shit, or to secede and start a new nation.