That's the irony of LED fans bashing and flat out lying about Gavita gear. It achieves what they pretend to be after, higher efficiency and money savings. And not talking about wall plug or electrical or luminous efficiency, but the efficiency that matters, which is gpw or more specifically g per $ electricity.
Does your G/$ electricity include the cost of running an HVAC system? Or just the cost of running the lamp? Does actual oil content come into play(for concentrate makers) or are we just strictly talking about raw vegetative yield?
Hypothetical, but what if cobs yielded less in flower weight, but yielded higher in concentrate production? I know a lot of the 'shills' in the CMH section of ICMAG are investigating this.
And yeah yeah, you fanboys can build something more efficient with cobs that don't produce as much heat but at a quarter of the wattage need heat sinks larger than a gavita 1kwatter's ballast, and then still need fans on top of it
What difference does the size of the lamp make? What difference does it make if there is a 2 watt fan attached? Compared to the giant 100-200w vortex fans most people use? How are these negatives? You should really elaborate since most 'commercial indoor growers' or even 'people concerned with yield' as you put it, typically have ample space.
HPS directs heat towards the canopy, unless you live in a hot dessert that's a plus, not a downside. And even then you can swap day and night. I've seen professional large side by side HPS vs LED tests in which they ended up hanging up a few HPS bulbs on the LED side to make it fair in terms of canopy temps.
What if cannopy temps are already at desired levels....? In area's where it's already 100+ that's just adding onto the HVAC bill. I'm pretty sure 90-110* cannopy temps will slow down the rate of photosynthesis.
The poser bullshit about BTUs... the whole heat argument is just desperate shill nonsense, with exceptions the larger growers for who that's actually relevant definitely aren't not going to tie dozens of cobs together either.
Why not go talk to a physics professor at a local university. They'll set you straight. Heat is energy period. The unit for BTU is being replaced by the standard SI unit for energy, the Joule
. Don't believe me? open up a physics book.
More LED-LoL: LED has longer lifetime than HPS... yeah, the chip vs the bulb... more specifically, the chip in a professional construction vs the bulb in a professional fixture.
Currently, the LM-70(the amount of time it takes for light levels to drop to 70% of it's rated output) of the bridgelux vero 29 is 50k hours, driven at 1.5x nominal current (125w). Even if it's only half that, that's still 5 YEARS 12/12 cycles and the life cycle perfectly coincides with the rated lifespan of most high quality drivers. Now if we take into account that the LM-70 rating increases if the chips are driven below nominal, we have a very nice picture for anyone who wants a low maintenance light.
We keep shifting points though, one second it's professional large scale indoor grows, next it's greenhouses, then some dude in his basement with a 4x4(which, btw GAVITA doesn't recommend one light in any situation.), back to a university greenhouse. All over the board. To whom does this discussion regard?
Group buy on sending a light out to get tested in an integrating sphere? I think that's our biggest hold up at the moment is the lack of university or standardized testing right now.