Disgraced ’19 Kids’ Star Josh Duggar Named in Ashley Madison Leak

londonfog

Well-Known Member
No. I'm comparing the means that both a pedophile uses and proponents of government schools use are the same...force. Know why? Because they are.

If the means both use aren't derived from nondefensive force, prove me wrong. You can't, not because you're stupid*, because I've stated a demonstrable fact.



*To be clear, I didn't say you weren't stupid, I said even a person that wasn't stupid could accurately opine differently over a fact.
So what about a private school. Do you have a problem with a pedophile living next to a private school ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
So what about a private school. Do you have a problem with a pedophile living next to a private school ?

I have a problem with people that use nondefensive force.

I notice you didn't refute my factual statement comparing the embedded coercion in both the sexual predator and the way government schools are funded. Now don't you feel just a little silly trying to argue with me, when you clearly are inept and suck at it?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
I have a problem with people that use nondefensive force.

I notice you didn't refute my factual statement comparing the embedded coercion in both the sexual predator and the way government schools are funded. Now don't you feel just a little silly trying to argue with me, when you clearly are inept and suck at it?
All I want to know is why you defend pedophiles and think its ok for a convicted child molester to live around a school. Your argument is to say "schools are forced ". I then pointed out that not all schools are public. You now have no answer.

Allow me to leave no confusion. A person who is a known or convicted pedophile has no right living next to ANY school be it private, charter, or public.
 

skunkd0c

Well-Known Member
Pedophiles lose certain rights when convicted .... as they should
I agree, but some pedophiles spend less time in jail than some folk do for smoking pot
pedophiles get taken on trips to the zoo to see if they are still dangerous/attracted to children

i think pot smokers should be taken to Amsterdam or maybe Californ I A
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
I agree, but some pedophiles spend less time in jail than some folk do for smoking pot
pedophiles get taken on trips to the zoo to see if they are still dangerous/attracted to children

i think pot smokers should be taken to Amsterdam or maybe Californ I A
I'm just curious as to why @Rob Roy think it is ok for a pedophile to have the right to live next to a school ?
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
I agree, but some pedophiles spend less time in jail than some folk do for smoking pot
pedophiles get taken on trips to the zoo to see if they are still dangerous/attracted to children

i think pot smokers should be taken to Amsterdam or maybe Californ I A
Interesting
Have a link?
 

skunkd0c

Well-Known Member
You guys from the church of white pride are locked into a fatal troll loop with Robert, i find it tedious its very lowbrow trolling
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
A viewpoint ONLY you believe in

But most people here know you are a pedophile and racist
Except you're wrong. Believing in something false, even if alot of people do it, doesn't confer truth to something that is false. I don't like sexual predators or racists, or prohibitionists for that matter.

Also, I think you are annoyed because one of us (you) has advocated for a law that contains a prohibition, which is irrefutable based on the evidence. You somehow think because it might be better than the present level of tyranny that it's a great idea. It's not, it still arises from the idea that some people must "let" others do something.

Figuratively speaking, you are advocating better treatment for the slaves. I am advocating for abolition of slavery, two different things, Prohibitionist.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
If a pedophile is a bad person because they used or threatened force to engage a nonconsenting person, how is it okay when schools use the same method (force) to acquire their funding? I await your well thought out and on point answer to my question.
are you honestly comparing property taxes to the rape and sexual assault of small children?

you are beyond fucked up in the head.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I have never defended you
your racial segregationist buddy rob roy is the one who refuses to state that it should be illegal for an adult to have sex with a child.

i have no problem saying that should be illegal.

but "sovereign" citizens like you don't feel that pedophilia laws should apply to them.

kill yourself.
 

skunkd0c

Well-Known Member
your racial segregationist buddy rob roy is the one who refuses to state that it should be illegal for an adult to have sex with a child.

i have no problem saying that should be illegal.

but "sovereign" citizens like you don't feel that pedophilia laws should apply to them.

kill yourself.
it is illegal so why do you think your opinion matters ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
All I want to know is why you defend pedophiles and think its ok for a convicted child molester to live around a school. Your argument is to say "schools are forced ". I then pointed out that not all schools are public. You now have no answer.

Allow me to leave no confusion. A person who is a known or convicted pedophile has no right living next to ANY school be it private, charter, or public.
What if that "pedophile" was an 18 year old young man that banged your hypothetical underage, but willing daughter and they both had professed their undying love for each other? What if that "pedophile" had fathered your grand child and was doing everything in his power to care and love for your daughter and their child?

Burn him at the stake ? Force him to fold laundry, but not give him the key to the closet where you hide your secret lingerie stash?


Also, you never addressed how on one hand you can advocate for forced human relations (forced funding of government schools) but on the other hand disavow them. Isn't that a contradiction?
 
Top