injunction/court case updates

torontoke

torontoke

Well-Known Member
One of the very first videos I saw of Conroy was him begging for hand outs from the entire mmj community while admitting that the case only really helped those named. It smelled from the get go. he has also said from the beginning that this whole case wasn't about getting grow rights back for any new patients. Those days are gone I believe was his quote.
 
cannadan

cannadan

Well-Known Member
doingdishes said:
the other email:

When this was set up Conroy was employed by Jason Wilcox ONLY, not by the Coalition. But if you ask Conroy he will say that he answers to the Coalition and his clients, he does not he answers to Jason Wilcox. We have that from a tape recorded interview at Conroys office I attended with Wilcox and Joy Davies. Conroy in reality answers to one thing only ,$$$$$$, that's it.

I'm not sure why that wouldn't fit into one post
Click to expand...
I FRIGGIN KNEW IT.....right deep in my bones I could feel it..
 
doingdishes

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
torontoke said:
One of the very first videos I saw of Conroy was him begging for hand outs from the entire mmj community while admitting that the case only really helped those named. It smelled from the get go. he has also said from the beginning that this whole case wasn't about getting grow rights back for any new patients. Those days are gone I believe was his quote.
Click to expand...
he said it would be 5 years for new patients to be able to grow for themselves.
my wife and I were going to donate one of the cheques we got from the breach of privacy as we will get one each but now there's not a chance in HELL we will support him. i am personally affected by his screw up and the fact that he was a lame duck in filing for a variance really pissed me off and the fact he hasn't revisited it in the higher court is disgusting in tself
 
cannadan

cannadan

Well-Known Member
typical these bastards got to put the fix in for themselves.......all the while
trying to seem as if the support all of us hard done by....patients....
well guess what we are hard done by....screwed at every turn....
These sick bunch of narcissistic assholes....with zero empathy..
 
cannadan

cannadan

Well-Known Member
doingdishes said:
here's the email i received a while back. i was given permission to post it. it has some names in it and I didn't want to post it without their permission.
@JungleStrikeGuy here's the info you asked me for earlier:

As the Executive Director at the time of the MMAR Coalition. We originally asked Conroy to file a constitutional challenge, and if that did not work then a class action suit for damages. Some how he got his wires crossed. We , Jason Wilcox and I showed Conroys case to a lawyer by the name of Kate Saunders at Branch McMaster, who said that Conroy should of filed a constitutional challenge and not a class action, which would have been way quicker and less costly, so yes CONROY is 100% responsible for that major screw up. Kate Saunders said CONROY was doing us no favors at all. In fact it was right about that time CONROY tried to muscle in on the Class Action privacy branch suit against Health Canada by meeting with Kate, my lawyer at the time to discuss how he wanted to receive 5% of the up 30 % the lawyers were going to take. Conroy met with her, and they declined his assistance for a potential of 5% of the winnings up to 40 million. Talk about greed. CONROY did all of this without consent from myself or Jason, if you can believe that !! I swear this is the truth.

CONROY discontinued the class action because Kate told him he was doing all wrong, and then he released some lame excuse to pretend everything was ok.
Click to expand...
Here is a portion Hippy...its back one page
 
torontoke

torontoke

Well-Known Member
The Hippy said:
Can someone put in a brief explanation what Conroy has done wrong. This is hard to follow.
Click to expand...
He basically turned his back from joining a group that had a higher chance of winning over his cut. Instead of trying to help as many of us as possible he chose to focus on only helping those that directly pay him which is ironic because in the end we have all donated like dummies
Money motivates everyone differently and it's not really surprising
 
doingdishes

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
The Hippy said:
Can someone put in a brief explanation what Conroy has done wrong. This is hard to follow.
Click to expand...
CONroy has gone the wrong way. he filed it wrong...discontinued our best shot at getting our gardens or changes done because he didn't include someone with current paperwork that needed changes. if he didn't do that blunder, we'd be better off....then he had sympathy at the higher court for the variance-they higher court didn't understand why the judge excluded people who needed changes so they sent it back to him to explain why he did that. he explained it was carefully crafted and he chose those dates so it was the least infringement on the MMPR. then instead of Conroy pursuing the variance in the higher court, he discontinued it and went for the lower court which is like you going to your manager for something your supervisor did. the manager agrees with you and says that's not right but instead of continuing the conversation with the manager, you go to another supervisor who can't do anything because he has the same level of authority. if you had stayed in the conversation with the manager, he could have done something.
he's not giving us the BEST defense. finding out he reports to only Jason Wilcox was a mind blower for me. i found that out today
I am personally VERY disappointed in him for the mis-steps. if he or someone from his family were a left out, i think he would be giving us better service
the really big one is that he originally was supposed to file it as a class action and we all would have a right to appeal but he then narrowed it down to his 4 plaintiffs leaving everyone else out.
 
Last edited:
The Hippy

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
doingdishes said:
CONroy has gone the wrong way. he filed it wrong...discontinued our best shot at getting our gardens or changes done because he didn't include someone with current paperwork that needed changes. if he didn't do that blunder, we'd be better off....then he had sympathy at the higher court for the variance-they higher court didn't understand why the judge excluded people who needed changes so they sent it back to him to explain why he did that. he explained it was carefully crafted and he chose those dates so it was the least infringement on the MMPR. then instead of Conroy pursuing the variance in the higher court, he discontinued it and went for the lower court which is like you going to your manager for something your supervisor did. the manager agrees with you and says that's not right but instead of continuing the conversation with the manager, you go to another supervisor who can't do anything because he has the same level of authority. if you had stayed in the conversation with the manager, he could have done something.
he's not giving us the BEST defense. finding out he reports to only Jason Wilcox was a mind blower for me. i found that out today
I am personally VERY disappointed in him for the mis-steps. if he or someone from his family were a left out, i think he would be giving us better service
the really big one is that he originally was supposed to file it as a class action and we all would have a right to appeal but he then narrowed it down to his 4 plaintiffs leaving everyone else out.
Click to expand...
I see...very good explanation for us legally challenged minds.
So this about o be decided allard decision will only cover 4 people ?? Or just the ones who had renewed.
 
doingdishes

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
The Hippy said:
I see...very good explanation for us legally challenged minds.
So this about o be decided allard decision will only cover 4 people ?? Or just the ones who had renewed.
Click to expand...
the messed up part is that the judge in Allard recognizes that the case represents a large group of patients but only the 4 can only file for relief. That confuses me. that's what the amend kit challenges
I'd like to see Beemish and Hebert file the amend kit. that way the judges couldn't turn them away
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top