Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
"The Iran Deal Benefits U.S. National SecurityWell, after all the other treaties they followed... Oh wait....
Obama wants to justify his Nobel Prize before they take it away from him.
An Open Letter from Retired Generals and Admirals
On July 14, 2015, after two years of intense international
negotiations, an agreement was announced by the United States,
the United Kingdom, France, Germany, China and Russia to contain
Iran’s nuclear program. We, the undersigned retired military
officers, support the agreement as the most effective means currently
available to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
The international deal blocks the potential pathways to a nuclear
bomb, provides for intrusive verification, and strengthens American
national security. America and our allies, in the Middle East and
around the world, will be safer when this agreement is fully
implemented. It is not based on trust; the deal requires verification
and tough sanctions for failure to comply.
There is no better option to prevent an Iranian nuclear weapon.
Military action would be less effective than the deal, assuming it is
fully implemented. If the Iranians cheat, our advanced technology,
intelligence and the inspections will reveal it, and U.S. military
options remain on the table. And if the deal is rejected by America,
the Iranians could have a nuclear weapon within a year. The choice is
that stark.
We agree with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General
Martin Dempsey, who said on July 29, 2015, “[r]elieving the risk of a
nuclear conflict with Iran diplomatically is superior than trying to do
that militarily.”
If at some point it becomes necessary to consider military action
against Iran, gathering sufficient international support for such an
effort would only be possible if we have first given the diplomatic
path a chance. We must exhaust diplomatic options before moving to
military ones.
For these reasons, for the security of our Nation, we call upon
Congress and the American people to support this agreement.
GEN James “Hoss” Cartwright, U.S. Marine Corps
MGEN William L. Nash, U.S. Army
GEN Joseph P. Hoar, U.S. Marine Corps
MGEN Tony Taguba, U.S. Army
GEN Merrill “Tony” McPeak, U.S. Air Force
RADM John Hutson, U.S. Navy
GEN Lloyd W. "Fig" Newton, U.S. Air Force
RADM Malcolm MacKinnon III, U.S. Navy
LGEN Robert G. Gard, Jr., U.S. Army
RADM Edward "Sonny" Masso, U.S. Navy
LGEN Arlen D. Jameson, U.S. Air Force
RADM Joseph Sestak, U.S. Navy
LGEN Frank Kearney, U.S. Army
RADM Garland “Gar” P. Wright, U.S. Navy
LGEN Claudia J. Kennedy, U.S. Army
BGEN John Adams, U.S. Air Force
LGEN Donald L. Kerrick, U.S. Army
BGEN Stephen A. Cheney, U.S. Marine Corps
LGEN Charles P. Otstott, U.S. Army
BGEN Patricia "Pat" Foote, U.S. Army
LGEN Norman R. Seip, U.S. Air Force
BGEN Lawrence E. Gillespie, U.S. Army
LGEN James M. Thompson, U.S. Army
BGEN John Johns, U.S. Army
VADM Kevin P. Green, U.S. Navy
BGEN David McGinnis, U.S. Army
VADM Lee F. Gunn, U.S. Navy
BGEN Stephen Xenakis, U.S. Army
MGEN George Buskirk, US Army
RDML James Arden "Jamie" Barnett, Jr., U.S. Navy
MGEN Paul D. Eaton, U.S. Army
RDML Jay A. DeLoach, U.S. Navy
MGEN Marcelite J. Harris, U.S. Air Force
RDML Harold L. Robinson, U.S. Navy
MGEN Frederick H. Lawson, U.S. Army
RDML Alan Steinman, U.S. Coast Guard"
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/world/read-an-open-letter-from-retired-generals-and-admirals-on-the-iran-nuclear-deal/1689/
But I suppose you know better than a few dozen generals and admirals...