A little more about life expectancy of leds vs hps.
Hps lamps can easly reach 4000-6000h with usable output.
Leds they claim 50.000h, which is bogus. They rate them at very low power. For a good light output you need to crank the leds wattage, which shortens their life expectancy a lot! You ate looking at 5000h max with no serious output degradation for a good quality led. They will work longer, but at severly reduced lumens...
I have looked into leds extensively, but due to cutlrrent costs they are not viable for larger rooms, as they cost too much.
Well, then you must not have researched them very efficiently, Seeing how LEDs will save a large grower about $100-$200 a month on there electricity bill. The initial costs are higher yes, But the long term costs are a much different story, LEDs do last a considerable amount of time longer then HPS as well, I have used LEDs for many years, My computer is filled with LED custom lighting, and it is 3 years old without a single bulb going out yet, so do I believe LEDs can last for a lot longer ? Yes I do.
I know they are cheaper in the long run, and more expensive initially. But what I am trying to find out, is people who have actually used one or the other, and to see if they noticed a difference in yields.
I have read countless posts online and grow journals, and have found 100s of people who swear they got larger more dense plants growing with the LEDs, I have also seen several comparison videos on Youtube, Of "Supposed" side by side comparisons between LEDs and HPS, and the LEDs again end up producing more yield. But I want advice from people who have personally had experience with them, and what they saw.
Also can someone explain this video, that says HPS / HID is better ??? I cannot for the life of me find a video saying HPS had larger yields, literally every grow journal and video says LED grows bigger yields... Can anyone tell me more personally discovered information ?