Why Have There Been More Mass Shootings Under Obama than the Four Previous Presidents Combined?

Uncle Ben

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
Obviously this isn’t so easily simplified as more guns in the hands of more crazy people, the way the media likes to spin it. We have more gun laws now than ever before. Less types of guns are legally available to the average citizen than ever before. We also have more “gun-free zones,” zones where, just by the way, most of these shootings happen (because mass shooters do not follow laws or care about zones, obviously). So that’s not it.

Not to mention that five out of the 12 deadliest mass shootings in American history have happened not just since Barack Obama became president, but just under his first term as president alone. That’s nearly half.

Something else is going on here.

Mass Shootings under the Last Five Presidents

Ronald Reagan: 1981-1989 (8 years) 11 mass shootings
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 5

George H. W. Bush: 1989-1993 (4 years) 12 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 3

Bill Clinton: 1993-2001 (8 years) 23 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 4

George W. Bush: 2001-2009 (8 years) 20 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 5

Barrack H. Obama: 2009-2015 (in 7th year) 162 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 18



http://www.thedailysheeple.com/why-have-there-been-more-mass-shootings-under-obama-than-the-four-previous-presidents-combined_122015
 
meristem

meristem

Well-Known Member
Easy - it's because we haven't had a Global Climate Change Summit here yet. Next shooting we need to have a summit and presto! Once the bad guys get that "we're having a climate change summit here" message they'll ALL flee the United States like Superman from a kryptonite mine.
 
Uncle Ben

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
Most gun laws in history, lots of gun free zones, left wing attacks on citizens trying to defend themselves, attacks on the NRA, plenty of PC stupidity. What's there not to like about Obamaland for a raghead terrorist wanting to kill innocents just for the sake of killing and power? Homegrown or not.

Oh, and let's not forget to inform our Muslim enemies of our military strategic moves. ;)
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Uncle Ben said:
Obviously this isn’t so easily simplified as more guns in the hands of more crazy people, the way the media likes to spin it. We have more gun laws now than ever before. Less types of guns are legally available to the average citizen than ever before. We also have more “gun-free zones,” zones where, just by the way, most of these shootings happen (because mass shooters do not follow laws or care about zones, obviously). So that’s not it.

Not to mention that five out of the 12 deadliest mass shootings in American history have happened not just since Barack Obama became president, but just under his first term as president alone. That’s nearly half.

Something else is going on here.

Mass Shootings under the Last Five Presidents

Ronald Reagan: 1981-1989 (8 years) 11 mass shootings
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 5

George H. W. Bush: 1989-1993 (4 years) 12 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 3

Bill Clinton: 1993-2001 (8 years) 23 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 4

George W. Bush: 2001-2009 (8 years) 20 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 5

Barrack H. Obama: 2009-2015 (in 7th year) 162 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 18



http://www.thedailysheeple.com/why-have-there-been-more-mass-shootings-under-obama-than-the-four-previous-presidents-combined_122015
Click to expand...
I'll humour you and give you the answer you want (despite it being bullshit).

It's cos he black.

What a bullshit thread..
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
meristem said:
Easy - it's because we haven't had a Global Climate Change Summit here yet. Next shooting we need to have a summit and presto! Once the bad guys get that "we're having a climate change summit here" message they'll ALL flee the United States like Superman from a kryptonite mine.
Click to expand...
hello, new sock puppet!

i look forward to your coming out party as the latest racist loser sock puppet on our already crowded forum!
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Because he demonizes the police making it harder for them to do their jobs and there is a corresponding increase in crime when distrust and anger is ginned up between the cops and the community.
 
Nutes and Nugs

Nutes and Nugs

Well-Known Member
The lack of morals.
Distancing ourselves from religion.
Gay rights and all these special interests groups that look out only for themselves.
Liberals think they are liberating the world but they are just digging early graves for people.
The whole world is going to 'Hell in a bucket'.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Nutes and Nugs said:
The lack of morals.
Click to expand...
From religious people everywhere. Oddly enough, "the lack of morals" doesn't seem to be coming out of the atheist or agnostic communities... Weird..
Nutes and Nugs said:
Distancing ourselves from religion.
Click to expand...
Then why do we only ever hear about mass shootings or terrorism committed by religious people and never about bullshit like that committed by atheists or agnostics?
Nutes and Nugs said:
Gay rights and all these special interests groups that look out only for themselves.
Click to expand...
How do LGBT rights correlate to an increase in mass shootings? Unless of course you mean crazy religious fucks, like you, deciding to murder people because the country is clearly steering towards equal rights for LGBTs and they can't fathom why?
Nutes and Nugs said:
Liberals think they are liberating the world but they are just digging early graves for people.
Click to expand...
Religious people are murdering people at extraordinary rates because they're too politically and religiously biased to understand why that's wrong
Nutes and Nugs said:
The whole world is going to 'Hell in a bucket'.
Click to expand...
Thanks to religious people
 
Last edited:
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
After next years election he will be hating women as well
View attachment 3557752
Click to expand...
That's pretty much an admission that you'll be FALSELY labeling him as hating women for the purpose of marginalizing his political views. Otherwise, his hatred of women wouldn't be predicated on a woman being elected President. No different than the claims of racism against members who disagree with our current POTUS. When those same members attack Clinton's ideology and policies with the same vehemence as Obama's, it will stand as proof their protests were politically based, not race based. Not that it will deter you or the dullards with whom you consort from doing it again. If Sanders was elected, you'd say Conservatives hate old, white males, despite previous statements that we are nothing but old white males.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
That's pretty much an admission that you'll be FALSELY labeling him as hating women for the purpose of marginalizing his political views. Otherwise, his hatred of women wouldn't be predicated on a woman being elected President. No different than the claims of racism against members who disagree with our current POTUS. When those same members attack Clinton's ideology and policies with the same vehemence as Obama's, it will stand as proof their protests were politically based, not race based. Not that it will deter you or the dullards with whom you consort from doing it again. If Sanders was elected, you'd say Conservatives hate old, white males, despite previous statements that we actually are all old white males.
Click to expand...
Yeah, cos calling him a monkey and stuff attracts unwarranted cries of racism...

That was sarcasm incase youre too simple to realise.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
Yeah, cos calling him a monkey and stuff attracts unwarranted cries of racism...

That was sarcasm incase youre too simple to realise.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I picked up on the sarcasm, thanks.

It's hard to reply to your post, since I've never seen any member refer to him as such.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top