Nonetheless, out of the entire world we account for 80% of the gun related homicides. That's a ridiculous amount. Everybody knows that people will continue to kill people with whatever they can get their hands on, but it's a disingenuous argument to the figure.
Can you not read? I said that this event was somewhat of an outlier. However the point is to stop future events from happening. That's usually the point of this type of legislation.
No, the point of this type of legislation is so you feel better. It wont stop crime, it will just prevent more legal sales of guns.
No, that's just stupidity. Also to say the left is intolerant is stupidity as well. Usually conservatives are more intolerant, unless somehow hate groups have suddenly started to vote Democrat... oh wait.. they vote Republican.
The Mommy Make Them Stop Act?
It wan't an outlier, otherwise you wouldn't be concerned.
This is the cause of many pro-gun people's anger. You just admitted that this event was an outlier but are still clamoring for the same kind of gun legislation that is repeated ad-nauseum every time there is a shooting. There are no common sense suggestions, just cookie cutter bans on large gun clips (which Sayed ignored), trigger guards (now that one is laughable here), and lists of banned weapons that look scary when other guns have exactly the same functionality.
good job on parroting NRA logic.
Except this stuff works. It's kind of laughable that you believe it doesn't. As I stated and provided a source for, gun violence in California has dropped 56% even accounting for population increase between 1993 when the stricter gun laws were enacted and 2015. So, guess what? Whether you like it or not, stricter gun laws lead to less gun violence.
since when do you need weapon for self defense ???
So when Clinton warned Bush about 9/11...? The FBI even said that they were investigating why he flipped. You know how many people are out there making pipe bombs in their basement? It doesn't make him stupid because for all intents and purposes there were little outward and noticeable signs that they would do this. The FBI said Farook's contact with people on a watch list were "soft contacts," meaning it wasn't worth watching. What do you suggest we do then?
Good job Obama Administration or was this Ted Cruz and the Republican party's doing? Or when something goes wrong it's solely Obama's fault but when they get things right he had nothing to do with it and it was the "hard work" of the government. Make up your mind and come off it. It's just silly.
Some reports suggest he was radicalized by his wife. How was she vetted and then given a K-1 visa? Just because I mentioned 9/11 for statistical reasons, that doesn't mean I am making this about George Bush. Clinton had his chance to get Bin Laden, but refused to pull the trigger. He claims to have been worried about civilian casualties to cover his ass, but what about 3,000 American casualties at the World Trade Center? I guess he never factored that in, did he? Trump did. Donald Trump not only warned people about Bin Laden, but specifically the World Trade Center as a target. What does he get in return? Reporters calling him a liar after it turns out he was right. Muslims were cheering in celebration when the tower fell down.
I didnt say anything otherwise. My point is that the 80 people in that party did not have a choice whether to defend themselves or not as they were gunned down.
How about an executive order giving the military authority to spray sleeping gas on San Ber'dino?
The FBI said it was self-radicalization here in the United States. Even more Muslims put out support for the US afterwards, for instance there were candle vigils in Iran; Khatami and Khameni condemned the attacks. Yusuf al-Qaradawi a very renown Muslim scholar called it a crime, the spiritual leader of Hamas condemned the attacks, even the Taliban condemned the attacks.