F*CK THE POLICE!!!
- Thread starter bearkat42
- Start date
superloud
Well-Known Member
Hate propaganda for what? I mean I haven't read all 125 pages but all I see are a lot if stories and videos of some pigs misusing there badge power and guns.
D528
Well-Known Member
Excuse me while i get my hate on lmfao. Life muts look great though rose collored glasses..My heart goes out to those infected with msm hegalian dialect. i wish truth and compasion for them. Its almost like cops are seing shit on p2p shooters crank after a few day roll and a greenbud joint. what makes them different from a tweaker. lol. probly all aderall , aspartamed and sterioded out. lol. Cant blame i.q. .you can still do your lawyers and drs job with a 78 rating .lol. This i know !
Nineteen-Hour 'Standoff' Ends With Law Enforcement Officers Destroying An Empty House
by Tim Cushing
The Cherokee County (KS) Sheriff's Department engaged in a fruitless 19-hour standoff with a vacant residence. On the 20th hour, the fugitive house was finally taken down.A SWAT truck with a battering ram attached was used to poke holes and tear apart the house in an attempt to drive the nonexistent suspect out. As deputies became unable to find him, they began taking their frustration out on couches, beds, lamps, clothing, toys, and even the family’s Christmas tree was ripped through a window and smashed to bits.
The entire time, Nita Lane, the homeowner, was trying to tell the cops that Alexius was not there and does not live there.
The sheriff, quite expectedly, remains unapologetic. Despite being told by the victim that Alexius was not in her house, [Sheriff David] Groves maintains that his officers acted in the best possible manner.
“It appeared using that tool [infra-red camera] there was somebody in the attic. As it turns out, now we know that was incorrect. But nonetheless that was the information we were operating under at the time,” said Groves.The write-up at The Free Thought Project contains a decent summation of the ridiculous ordeal, but the real fun comes in reading the play-by-play at the Joplin Globe, which captures the shifting narrative provided by the Sheriff's Department.
It begins on December 15th, with the site declaring "Joplin man in standoff with law enforcement in Galena." Granted, this was several hours before it was discovered that a more accurate headline would have been "Joplin house in standoff with law enforcement."Galena police and agents with the Kansas Bureau of Investigation and the FBI served a search warrant about 9 p.m. Monday at 1009 E. Fifth St. looking for Alexius and removed a woman and four children from the home. In the course of serving the warrant, they learned that Alexius was hiding in the attic of the single-story house and might be armed.That's not really what they learned. They used a thermal imaging camera and thought they detected someone hiding in the attic. So, the standoff began, with the sheriff confidently stating they'd be able to wait out the fugitive member of the local gang concern, "Joplin Honkies," thanks to the department's bench depth."Time is on our side," the sheriff said. "We have the luxury of being able to rotate officers out. At some point, he's going to have to come out of there."Five hours later, Sheriff Groves admitted that the man the occupants of the house had already stated wasn'tin the house was, in fact, not in the house.Cherokee County Sheriff David Groves said local, state and federal law enforcement officers late into the day on Tuesday had believed that Doug Alexius, 40, of Joplin, was inside the home and armed, although no shots had been fired.
Groves said a search that ended at 5:30 p.m. concluded that Alexius was not in the home.Left unmentioned was the damage done to the house in search of the fugitive who wasn't there. Law enforcement officers fired flash bangs into the home and used an armored vehicle-mounted ram to punch holes in the attic. The officers also tore apart the inside of the home in their futile search.
It wasn't until the following day that the damage done to the home was addressed. The FBI agreed to pay for the destruction, but Sheriff Groves refused to shoulder any of the blame, despite initiating the pointless standoff."As for why specific tactics were utilized or items removed, those questions would need to be directed to the teams involved in that action," Groves wrote in an email to the Globe. "The teams utilized were from the KBI and FBI. The FBI indicated yesterday (Tuesday) that they would be paying for the damages to the home."He also wrote:"The information we received indicates he was in the residence that morning… Either that information was inaccurate or he left prior to law enforcement arrival. We have no reason to believe that he left the residence once a perimeter was established."This last sentence is problematic, given statements made later by other law enforcement officials.
The standoff that wasn't included police dogs, the evacuation of nearby houses, a cordoned-off block, officers from three law enforcement agencies (FBI, Sheriff's Department, Kansas Bureau of Investigation) and a plane circling overhead. Groves had "no reason" to believe the suspect had escaped undetected because that outcome verged on impossible. And yet, his statement was directly contradicted by the Kansas Bureau of Investigation two days later, starting with a justification for the havoc wreaked on the empty house:Doug Younger, the agent for the Kansas Bureau of Investigation who oversaw part of what has been described as a standoff between agents and an armed man reputed to be a member of the Joplin Honkies gang, walked through the house of single mother Juanita Lane on Tuesday night after it was all over.
Windows were broken out and a ram had been used to batter a hole in the back of the modest white house so agents could reach the attic where Doug Alexius was believed to be hiding. Throughout the 20 1/2-hour ordeal, the children's pet rabbit scampered around the house.
Younger, who oversees the statewide SWAT team for the KBI, told the Globe on Friday that he believes Alexius was in that house the whole time although the wanted man wasn't found after agents combed through the house with the help of a robot and dogs.
"I believe he was there, but we were going to have to tear the place down to find him," Younger said.Faith. Just the sort of thing we like to see in our law enforcement officers -- especially those willing to tear apart a family's home in service of their gut feelings. Younger actually congratulates himself for the house not being completely razed during the search for the nonexistent fugitive."I feel like we did due diligence, but at the same time we stopped before we tore the place to the ground," Younger said.Good for him. But Younger still holds the belief that the wily Joplin Honky either burrowed into the house's foundation or somehow made his way past the three-agency dragnet surrounding the house. This belief helps Younger justify the damage done to the house while simultaneously allowing him to brag about his agency's admirable restraint.
The FBI will cover the damage, which is nice. The courts have already made it clear law enforcement has no obligation to reimburse property owners for damaged houses, vehicles, or personal effects. That a federal agency would step up and assist the homeowner in this fashion is commendable, even if everything leading up to that point was a debacle.
Nineteen-Hour 'Standoff' Ends With Law Enforcement Officers Destroying An Empty House
by Tim Cushing
The Cherokee County (KS) Sheriff's Department engaged in a fruitless 19-hour standoff with a vacant residence. On the 20th hour, the fugitive house was finally taken down.A SWAT truck with a battering ram attached was used to poke holes and tear apart the house in an attempt to drive the nonexistent suspect out. As deputies became unable to find him, they began taking their frustration out on couches, beds, lamps, clothing, toys, and even the family’s Christmas tree was ripped through a window and smashed to bits.
The entire time, Nita Lane, the homeowner, was trying to tell the cops that Alexius was not there and does not live there.
The sheriff, quite expectedly, remains unapologetic. Despite being told by the victim that Alexius was not in her house, [Sheriff David] Groves maintains that his officers acted in the best possible manner.
“It appeared using that tool [infra-red camera] there was somebody in the attic. As it turns out, now we know that was incorrect. But nonetheless that was the information we were operating under at the time,” said Groves.The write-up at The Free Thought Project contains a decent summation of the ridiculous ordeal, but the real fun comes in reading the play-by-play at the Joplin Globe, which captures the shifting narrative provided by the Sheriff's Department.
It begins on December 15th, with the site declaring "Joplin man in standoff with law enforcement in Galena." Granted, this was several hours before it was discovered that a more accurate headline would have been "Joplin house in standoff with law enforcement."Galena police and agents with the Kansas Bureau of Investigation and the FBI served a search warrant about 9 p.m. Monday at 1009 E. Fifth St. looking for Alexius and removed a woman and four children from the home. In the course of serving the warrant, they learned that Alexius was hiding in the attic of the single-story house and might be armed.That's not really what they learned. They used a thermal imaging camera and thought they detected someone hiding in the attic. So, the standoff began, with the sheriff confidently stating they'd be able to wait out the fugitive member of the local gang concern, "Joplin Honkies," thanks to the department's bench depth."Time is on our side," the sheriff said. "We have the luxury of being able to rotate officers out. At some point, he's going to have to come out of there."Five hours later, Sheriff Groves admitted that the man the occupants of the house had already stated wasn'tin the house was, in fact, not in the house.Cherokee County Sheriff David Groves said local, state and federal law enforcement officers late into the day on Tuesday had believed that Doug Alexius, 40, of Joplin, was inside the home and armed, although no shots had been fired.
Groves said a search that ended at 5:30 p.m. concluded that Alexius was not in the home.Left unmentioned was the damage done to the house in search of the fugitive who wasn't there. Law enforcement officers fired flash bangs into the home and used an armored vehicle-mounted ram to punch holes in the attic. The officers also tore apart the inside of the home in their futile search.
It wasn't until the following day that the damage done to the home was addressed. The FBI agreed to pay for the destruction, but Sheriff Groves refused to shoulder any of the blame, despite initiating the pointless standoff."As for why specific tactics were utilized or items removed, those questions would need to be directed to the teams involved in that action," Groves wrote in an email to the Globe. "The teams utilized were from the KBI and FBI. The FBI indicated yesterday (Tuesday) that they would be paying for the damages to the home."He also wrote:"The information we received indicates he was in the residence that morning… Either that information was inaccurate or he left prior to law enforcement arrival. We have no reason to believe that he left the residence once a perimeter was established."This last sentence is problematic, given statements made later by other law enforcement officials.
The standoff that wasn't included police dogs, the evacuation of nearby houses, a cordoned-off block, officers from three law enforcement agencies (FBI, Sheriff's Department, Kansas Bureau of Investigation) and a plane circling overhead. Groves had "no reason" to believe the suspect had escaped undetected because that outcome verged on impossible. And yet, his statement was directly contradicted by the Kansas Bureau of Investigation two days later, starting with a justification for the havoc wreaked on the empty house:Doug Younger, the agent for the Kansas Bureau of Investigation who oversaw part of what has been described as a standoff between agents and an armed man reputed to be a member of the Joplin Honkies gang, walked through the house of single mother Juanita Lane on Tuesday night after it was all over.
Windows were broken out and a ram had been used to batter a hole in the back of the modest white house so agents could reach the attic where Doug Alexius was believed to be hiding. Throughout the 20 1/2-hour ordeal, the children's pet rabbit scampered around the house.
Younger, who oversees the statewide SWAT team for the KBI, told the Globe on Friday that he believes Alexius was in that house the whole time although the wanted man wasn't found after agents combed through the house with the help of a robot and dogs.
"I believe he was there, but we were going to have to tear the place down to find him," Younger said.Faith. Just the sort of thing we like to see in our law enforcement officers -- especially those willing to tear apart a family's home in service of their gut feelings. Younger actually congratulates himself for the house not being completely razed during the search for the nonexistent fugitive."I feel like we did due diligence, but at the same time we stopped before we tore the place to the ground," Younger said.Good for him. But Younger still holds the belief that the wily Joplin Honky either burrowed into the house's foundation or somehow made his way past the three-agency dragnet surrounding the house. This belief helps Younger justify the damage done to the house while simultaneously allowing him to brag about his agency's admirable restraint.
The FBI will cover the damage, which is nice. The courts have already made it clear law enforcement has no obligation to reimburse property owners for damaged houses, vehicles, or personal effects. That a federal agency would step up and assist the homeowner in this fashion is commendable, even if everything leading up to that point was a debacle.
Last edited:
D528
Well-Known Member
There are several types of propaganda. One being truth !
PA Cop Faces 30 Years in Prison After Being Duped by FBI Corruption Set-Up
by Asa Jay
A Pennsylvania cop with the Fairview Township police department in York County was arrested on federal corruption charges after being duped by an FBI sting operation, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said Friday.
Federal prosecutors maintain that 41-year-old Tyson Baker stole money from drug traffickers who had been arrested and pulled over, removed money seized by his department from evidence, and provided false information to federal investigators.
The FBI says they have recordings of the 17-year veteran orchestrating robberies of drug traffickers during traffic stops, and using codes to talk about stealing cash when speaking to a fellow cop that was working as a federal informant.
The informant accuses the officer of stealing between $5,000 and $10,000 during a February 2012 traffic stop in which he says Baker lied about smelling marijuana and instructed him to draft an affidavit of probable cause for a search warrant.
No marijuana was found in the car and the informant says Baker searched the vehicle prior to receiving the warrant when he stayed behind to “secure” it – and “ripped off” the driver, who claimed he was in possession of $20,000 at the time.
During the official search however, only $10,000 was found, along with two stolen guns and a small bag of heroin.
Baker is also accused of orchestrating the theft of $2,000 in drug proceeds seized by his department during a search of a home where six pounds of marijuana and about $14,000 was recovered in November.
After the seizure, Baker asked the informant what was found on the call, and then pointed to the cash removed from the residence and said, “I like that a lot, be smart about this, don’t get greedy; smart amount.”
The informant says Baker was telling him not to arouse suspicion by taking a large sum of money and later “discretely” wrote a on a piece of paper, “Money under carpet, carpet under locker,” in order to instruct him where to place the cash.
Finally on Wednesday, Baker received the ultimate amount of egg on his face when the FBI arranged a traffic stop in order to catch him red-handed.
Baker was told the car’s driver was a drug dealer traveling with a large amount of money, but instead, the occupant was actually an undercover agent who had the vehicle bugged with video recording devices.
According to prosecutors, Baker towed the vehicle to a secluded garage without a warrant and against orders, and searched a backpack in the rear of the vehicle where he found $15,000 and 400 Oxycontin pills.
Baker allegedly stole $3,000 before he spotted a camera inside the vehicle and tore it out. He kept $2,000 and gave $1,000 to the undercover informant.
On Friday, Baker was arrested and charged with violating the Hobbs Act, a federal statute that prohibits interfering with interstate commerce by force, violence or intimidation.
That charge carries a maximum of 20 years in prison and in addition, the officer faces two other corruption charges that each carry up to five year sentences. The case is still being investigated by the FBI and multiple other state and local agencies.
PA Cop Faces 30 Years in Prison After Being Duped by FBI Corruption Set-Up
by Asa Jay
Federal prosecutors maintain that 41-year-old Tyson Baker stole money from drug traffickers who had been arrested and pulled over, removed money seized by his department from evidence, and provided false information to federal investigators.
The FBI says they have recordings of the 17-year veteran orchestrating robberies of drug traffickers during traffic stops, and using codes to talk about stealing cash when speaking to a fellow cop that was working as a federal informant.
The informant accuses the officer of stealing between $5,000 and $10,000 during a February 2012 traffic stop in which he says Baker lied about smelling marijuana and instructed him to draft an affidavit of probable cause for a search warrant.
No marijuana was found in the car and the informant says Baker searched the vehicle prior to receiving the warrant when he stayed behind to “secure” it – and “ripped off” the driver, who claimed he was in possession of $20,000 at the time.
During the official search however, only $10,000 was found, along with two stolen guns and a small bag of heroin.
Baker is also accused of orchestrating the theft of $2,000 in drug proceeds seized by his department during a search of a home where six pounds of marijuana and about $14,000 was recovered in November.
After the seizure, Baker asked the informant what was found on the call, and then pointed to the cash removed from the residence and said, “I like that a lot, be smart about this, don’t get greedy; smart amount.”
The informant says Baker was telling him not to arouse suspicion by taking a large sum of money and later “discretely” wrote a on a piece of paper, “Money under carpet, carpet under locker,” in order to instruct him where to place the cash.
Finally on Wednesday, Baker received the ultimate amount of egg on his face when the FBI arranged a traffic stop in order to catch him red-handed.
Baker was told the car’s driver was a drug dealer traveling with a large amount of money, but instead, the occupant was actually an undercover agent who had the vehicle bugged with video recording devices.
According to prosecutors, Baker towed the vehicle to a secluded garage without a warrant and against orders, and searched a backpack in the rear of the vehicle where he found $15,000 and 400 Oxycontin pills.
Baker allegedly stole $3,000 before he spotted a camera inside the vehicle and tore it out. He kept $2,000 and gave $1,000 to the undercover informant.
On Friday, Baker was arrested and charged with violating the Hobbs Act, a federal statute that prohibits interfering with interstate commerce by force, violence or intimidation.
That charge carries a maximum of 20 years in prison and in addition, the officer faces two other corruption charges that each carry up to five year sentences. The case is still being investigated by the FBI and multiple other state and local agencies.
D528
Well-Known Member
Excuse me while i get my Wilhelm on......
"People avoid the truth because the first bit of truth uttered and lived would draw more truth into
action and so on indefinitely, and this would rip most people right off the customary tracks of
their lives. But people, basically, know what is true and what is not, even if they so often render
help to the lie. They support the lie because the lie has become a crutch without which life would
not be possible. Therefor, in common human intercourse, the truth, and not the lie, is suspected
as being phony." - Wilhelm Reich
“Man's right to know, to learn, to inquire, to make bona fide errors, to investigate human emotions must, by all means, be safe, if the word "freedom" should ever be more than an empty political slogan.”
― Wilhelm Reich
“I want you to stop being subhuman and become 'yourself'. 'Yourself,' I say. Not the newspaper you read, not your vicious neighbor's opinion, but 'yourself.' I know, and you don't, what you really are deep down. Deep down, you are what a deer, your God, your poet, or your philosopher is. But you think you're a member of the VFW, your bowling club, or the Ku Klux Klan, and because you think so, you behave as you do. This too was told you long ago, by Heinrich Mann in Germany, by Upton Sinclair and John Dos Passos in the United States. But you recognized neither Mann nor Sinclair. You recognize only the heavyweight champion and Al Capone. If given your choice between a library and a fight, you'll undoubtedly go to the fight.”
― Wilhelm Reich, Listen, Little Man!
I reallyu got nothing to say to people that use words like ragheads. I dont need to roll with racist !
"People avoid the truth because the first bit of truth uttered and lived would draw more truth into
action and so on indefinitely, and this would rip most people right off the customary tracks of
their lives. But people, basically, know what is true and what is not, even if they so often render
help to the lie. They support the lie because the lie has become a crutch without which life would
not be possible. Therefor, in common human intercourse, the truth, and not the lie, is suspected
as being phony." - Wilhelm Reich
“Man's right to know, to learn, to inquire, to make bona fide errors, to investigate human emotions must, by all means, be safe, if the word "freedom" should ever be more than an empty political slogan.”
― Wilhelm Reich
“I want you to stop being subhuman and become 'yourself'. 'Yourself,' I say. Not the newspaper you read, not your vicious neighbor's opinion, but 'yourself.' I know, and you don't, what you really are deep down. Deep down, you are what a deer, your God, your poet, or your philosopher is. But you think you're a member of the VFW, your bowling club, or the Ku Klux Klan, and because you think so, you behave as you do. This too was told you long ago, by Heinrich Mann in Germany, by Upton Sinclair and John Dos Passos in the United States. But you recognized neither Mann nor Sinclair. You recognize only the heavyweight champion and Al Capone. If given your choice between a library and a fight, you'll undoubtedly go to the fight.”
― Wilhelm Reich, Listen, Little Man!
I reallyu got nothing to say to people that use words like ragheads. I dont need to roll with racist !
Last edited:
D528
Well-Known Member
She Looked Down During a Mugshot, So A Cop Threw Her Face First Into A Bench
Woman Receives $875K After Cop Breaks Her Face
By Andrew Emett
Skokie, IL -- The village of Skokie recently agreed to pay $875,000 to a woman seen on jail surveillance video being shoved into a cement bench face-first. The officer admitted to fracturing her face because the nonviolent woman did not look directly at the camera during her mug shot photo.
Arrested for DUI on March 10, 2013, Cassandra Feuerstein was found asleep in her vehicle at 6 a.m. when officers took her into custody. A surveillance video from the jail shows Officer Mary Escobedo ordering Feuerstein to take off her shoes and bra before processing. After complying with her orders, Feuerstein is ordered into the hallway by Officer Michael Hart to take her mug shot photo.
A few seconds later, Feuerstein calmly returned to her cell when Officer Hart sadistically shoved her from behind into a cement bench across the cell. Slamming her head into the bench, Hart caused Feuerstein to fracture a bone in her face, loosen some of her teeth, and slice a cut across her cheek. Collapsed into a fetal position, Feuerstein wept over a pool of blood as Hart took one look at her before immediately fleeing the room.
Officer Escobedo returned to give Feuerstein bandages, while another officer cradled her bleeding head in his lap. In addition to the DUI charges, Feuerstein was also charged with resisting arrest. In his police report, Hart added the resisting arrest charge because Feuerstein was not looking directly at the camera during processing.
Requiring reconstructive surgery and a titanium plate in her face, Feuerstein eventually pled guilty to DUI after the State's Attorney agreed to drop the resisting arrest charge. Feuerstein also filed a lawsuit accusing Hart of filing a false incident report to justify his use of excessive force. With the surveillance video blatantly showing that she did not act aggressively or threaten anyone's safety, Feuerstein won both a judge's ruling and a settlement agreement that together amount to an $875,000 payout.
Several months after the incident, Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez charged Hart with felonyaggravated battery and official misconduct. Pleading guilty to the misconduct charge, Hart was given probation with no jail time. After the village announced termination proceedings against him, Hart resigned from the department.
Nearly three years after the incident, Feuerstein still suffers from nerve damage in her face. During a press conference, she recalled, "Apparently, I was not looking into the camera the way the officer wanted me to.
"
What an awsome guy eh...... real man. aspartame cowboy if you will ! well since cops say they dont protect us im in favor of getting rid of all of them. Thier reactionary pussies ! They dont do shit to protect you ! It just isnt thier job ! ask any cop on the site .lol.
Woman Receives $875K After Cop Breaks Her Face
By Andrew Emett
Skokie, IL -- The village of Skokie recently agreed to pay $875,000 to a woman seen on jail surveillance video being shoved into a cement bench face-first. The officer admitted to fracturing her face because the nonviolent woman did not look directly at the camera during her mug shot photo.
Arrested for DUI on March 10, 2013, Cassandra Feuerstein was found asleep in her vehicle at 6 a.m. when officers took her into custody. A surveillance video from the jail shows Officer Mary Escobedo ordering Feuerstein to take off her shoes and bra before processing. After complying with her orders, Feuerstein is ordered into the hallway by Officer Michael Hart to take her mug shot photo.
A few seconds later, Feuerstein calmly returned to her cell when Officer Hart sadistically shoved her from behind into a cement bench across the cell. Slamming her head into the bench, Hart caused Feuerstein to fracture a bone in her face, loosen some of her teeth, and slice a cut across her cheek. Collapsed into a fetal position, Feuerstein wept over a pool of blood as Hart took one look at her before immediately fleeing the room.
Officer Escobedo returned to give Feuerstein bandages, while another officer cradled her bleeding head in his lap. In addition to the DUI charges, Feuerstein was also charged with resisting arrest. In his police report, Hart added the resisting arrest charge because Feuerstein was not looking directly at the camera during processing.
Requiring reconstructive surgery and a titanium plate in her face, Feuerstein eventually pled guilty to DUI after the State's Attorney agreed to drop the resisting arrest charge. Feuerstein also filed a lawsuit accusing Hart of filing a false incident report to justify his use of excessive force. With the surveillance video blatantly showing that she did not act aggressively or threaten anyone's safety, Feuerstein won both a judge's ruling and a settlement agreement that together amount to an $875,000 payout.
Several months after the incident, Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez charged Hart with felonyaggravated battery and official misconduct. Pleading guilty to the misconduct charge, Hart was given probation with no jail time. After the village announced termination proceedings against him, Hart resigned from the department.
Nearly three years after the incident, Feuerstein still suffers from nerve damage in her face. During a press conference, she recalled, "Apparently, I was not looking into the camera the way the officer wanted me to.
"
What an awsome guy eh...... real man. aspartame cowboy if you will ! well since cops say they dont protect us im in favor of getting rid of all of them. Thier reactionary pussies ! They dont do shit to protect you ! It just isnt thier job ! ask any cop on the site .lol.
Last edited:
D528
Well-Known Member
NYPD Cop Indicted For Falsely Arresting Man Who Recorded Him
BY NATHAN TEMPEY IN NEWS ON DEC 22, 2015 5:03 PM
This is not how police are supposed to react to being filmed. (Rankin and Taylor/YouTube)
Manhattan prosecutors have done something rare indeed: indicted a cop for allegedly falsely arresting someone and lying about it. NYPD Officer Jonathan Munoz, 32, was arraigned this morning on two felony charges of filing false reports, and three misdemeanor charges of official misconduct and false statements.
"Had this officer’s attempts to conceal his alleged misconduct succeeded, an innocent man may still be facing charges for a fabricated crime," Manhattan DA Cy Vance said in a statement.
Munoz's prosecution stems from his role in arresting Jason Disisto, then 21, in the spring of 2014. From our report this April:
Disisto was standing outside of a Puerto Rican restaurant around 1 a.m. when he saw Officer Jonathan Munoz reaching into his friend's pocket. Disisto asked a friend to give him his phone so he could record, but as he lined up the shot, Munoz spotted him and rushed over to grab him. A brief struggle for the phone ensued, with two other officers joining in, and it ended with Disisto in cuffs in the back of a police car.
Before the officers drove away, one threw the cellphone out the window.
Munoz, a nine-year NYPD veteran, and officers Daniel Cross and Edwin Florez made the arrest. On the strength of a police report written up by Munoz, prosecutors charged Disisto with obstructing governmental administration, disorderly conduct, and resisting arrest. In his report, Munoz wrote that Disisto lunged and took a swing at him. It would have been hard to disprove had the interaction not been caught on surveillance camera, from three different angles.
Prosecutors dropped the charges against Disisto in July 2014, and he is now suing in federal court. His lawyers are in settlement negotiations with the city, court records show. One of Disisto's lawyers, David Rankin of the firm Rankin & Taylor, praised the grand jury's decision, and the DA's Office for bringing the case.
"Mr. Disisto is definitely pleased that the grand jury voted to indict Munoz, and we're heartened the New York County District Attorney's Office has taken this matter so seriously," he said. "We hope this indictment sends a message to the members of the NYPD, and that they'll think twice about fabricating statements against people in the future."
Rankin's firm's primarily handles police misconduct lawsuits. He said he sees clearcut instances of officers lying "with some regularity," but can recall "only a handful" of instances where lying cops were prosecuted.
"It’s so rare that an officer will actually get charged with filing a false instrument," he said.
Rankin said it helped that the video in this case was so clearcut, and that it shows the scene before the action begins.
"The evidence was just so strong," he said. "You can’t look at this video and think anything other than it just didn’t happen" the way Munoz said it did.
Munoz, who lives in Orange County, New York, was released without bail and ordered to surrender his passport. His lawyer Stephen Worth told the Daily News Disisto's collar was a "routine arrest" and that "Officer Munoz acted properly."
Munoz faces as many as 11 years in prison if convicted. An NYPD spokesperson said he has been suspended without pay. Officer Florez was previously placed on modified duty. NYPD Internal Affairs is also investigating the incident.
Lying in a criminal complaint, as it says at the bottom of each complaint form, is considered perjury, at least a misdemeanor punishable by a year imprisonment. Filing a false instrument requires prosecutors to show more intent, and is a felony punishable by as many as four years.
In October, a judge found NYPD Officer Michael Ackermann guilty of filing a false report after he arrested a New York Times photographer and falsely claimed the photographer blinded him with a camera flash and injured another officer while resisting arrest. The Manhattan DA's Office haswon perjury or false report convictions against at least five cops since 2010, and brought charges against a sixth who was acquitted.
A Manhattan DA's Office spokeswoman declined to comment on whether it is pursuing charges against Florez or Cross, and why police are not prosecuted for lying more often.
BY NATHAN TEMPEY IN NEWS ON DEC 22, 2015 5:03 PM
This is not how police are supposed to react to being filmed. (Rankin and Taylor/YouTube)
Manhattan prosecutors have done something rare indeed: indicted a cop for allegedly falsely arresting someone and lying about it. NYPD Officer Jonathan Munoz, 32, was arraigned this morning on two felony charges of filing false reports, and three misdemeanor charges of official misconduct and false statements.
"Had this officer’s attempts to conceal his alleged misconduct succeeded, an innocent man may still be facing charges for a fabricated crime," Manhattan DA Cy Vance said in a statement.
Munoz's prosecution stems from his role in arresting Jason Disisto, then 21, in the spring of 2014. From our report this April:
Disisto was standing outside of a Puerto Rican restaurant around 1 a.m. when he saw Officer Jonathan Munoz reaching into his friend's pocket. Disisto asked a friend to give him his phone so he could record, but as he lined up the shot, Munoz spotted him and rushed over to grab him. A brief struggle for the phone ensued, with two other officers joining in, and it ended with Disisto in cuffs in the back of a police car.
Before the officers drove away, one threw the cellphone out the window.
Munoz, a nine-year NYPD veteran, and officers Daniel Cross and Edwin Florez made the arrest. On the strength of a police report written up by Munoz, prosecutors charged Disisto with obstructing governmental administration, disorderly conduct, and resisting arrest. In his report, Munoz wrote that Disisto lunged and took a swing at him. It would have been hard to disprove had the interaction not been caught on surveillance camera, from three different angles.
Prosecutors dropped the charges against Disisto in July 2014, and he is now suing in federal court. His lawyers are in settlement negotiations with the city, court records show. One of Disisto's lawyers, David Rankin of the firm Rankin & Taylor, praised the grand jury's decision, and the DA's Office for bringing the case.
"Mr. Disisto is definitely pleased that the grand jury voted to indict Munoz, and we're heartened the New York County District Attorney's Office has taken this matter so seriously," he said. "We hope this indictment sends a message to the members of the NYPD, and that they'll think twice about fabricating statements against people in the future."
Rankin's firm's primarily handles police misconduct lawsuits. He said he sees clearcut instances of officers lying "with some regularity," but can recall "only a handful" of instances where lying cops were prosecuted.
"It’s so rare that an officer will actually get charged with filing a false instrument," he said.
Rankin said it helped that the video in this case was so clearcut, and that it shows the scene before the action begins.
"The evidence was just so strong," he said. "You can’t look at this video and think anything other than it just didn’t happen" the way Munoz said it did.
Munoz, who lives in Orange County, New York, was released without bail and ordered to surrender his passport. His lawyer Stephen Worth told the Daily News Disisto's collar was a "routine arrest" and that "Officer Munoz acted properly."
Munoz faces as many as 11 years in prison if convicted. An NYPD spokesperson said he has been suspended without pay. Officer Florez was previously placed on modified duty. NYPD Internal Affairs is also investigating the incident.
Lying in a criminal complaint, as it says at the bottom of each complaint form, is considered perjury, at least a misdemeanor punishable by a year imprisonment. Filing a false instrument requires prosecutors to show more intent, and is a felony punishable by as many as four years.
In October, a judge found NYPD Officer Michael Ackermann guilty of filing a false report after he arrested a New York Times photographer and falsely claimed the photographer blinded him with a camera flash and injured another officer while resisting arrest. The Manhattan DA's Office haswon perjury or false report convictions against at least five cops since 2010, and brought charges against a sixth who was acquitted.
A Manhattan DA's Office spokeswoman declined to comment on whether it is pursuing charges against Florez or Cross, and why police are not prosecuted for lying more often.
D528
Well-Known Member
“Unlike a member of the public, the officer gets a ‘cooling off’ period before he has to respond to any questions. Unlike a member of the public, the officer under investigation is privy to the names of his complainants and their testimony against him before he is ever interrogated. Unlike a member of the public, the officer under investigation is to be interrogated ‘at a reasonable hour,’ with a union member present. Unlike a member of the public, the officer can only be questioned by one person during his interrogation. Unlike a member of the public, the officer can be interrogated only ‘for reasonable periods,’ which ‘shall be timed to allow for such personal necessities and rest periods as are reasonably necessary.’ Unlike a member of the public, the officer under investigation cannot be ‘threatened with disciplinary action’ at any point during his interrogation. If he is threatened with punishment, whatever he says following the threat cannot be used against him.”
— Excerpts from the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights, as discussed in detail here
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12-21/liberty-imperiled-welcome-cop-land
— Excerpts from the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights, as discussed in detail here
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12-21/liberty-imperiled-welcome-cop-land
D528
Well-Known Member
Border Patrol Officer Viciously Beats Elderly Couple for Helping an Injured Woman
Posted on December 23, 2015 by # 1 NWO Hatr
Free Thought Project – by Matt Agorist
Brasher, NY — On the night of December 4, Carol LaDue and her husband Richard were travelling along County Route 37 near Massena, when they saw an injured woman lying in the road.
The woman was 33-year-old Ashley McDonald, who’d just been hit by a car and was dying.
Out of nowhere, the off-duty public servant rushes in on the Good Samaritans and begins brutally beating this elderly couple. The LaDues were nearly killed by this out of control maniac.
“I think he would have beat her to death, I really do, because there was no stopping the man. He was just out of control and very, very aggressive,” said Richard.
Richard suffered a broken nose and multiple lacerations, while his wife suffered a concussion, sprained hand, bruises and a massive head wound.
For the first time since this attack, the couple, who are in their 60’s, are speaking out inan interview with WNYF.
“He was really out of control. The next thing you know, I put my hands up, he popped me in the head and knocked me unconscious,” said Carol.
“His wife was laying in the road, and all we were doing was trying to help the guy and to have that kind of reaction, like he didn’t want anyone near the body,” said Richard.
The couple and authorities are now left with more questions than answers.
That night, Bryan McDonald was arrested and charged with two counts of felony assault. He was almost immediately released under probation supervision and faced no other charges, in spite of the fact that authorities still have no idea why his wife was lying in the road that night.
Investigators only know that Ashley McDonald was lying in the road when she was struck and killed by a vehicle operated by 32-year-old Megan Phelix. Why she was in the road, remains a mystery.
“My big question is why was she in the road? Did she fall there? Did she walk out there and fall down? Did he hit her? Who knows? We don’t really know,” said Carol.
According to the LaDues, McDonald was not grieving or showing any signs of sadness or worry when they arrived. He was merely standing there silently before attacking them.
“I’m not sure it was all grief because it was just very unnatural because normally you would be over the body and crying or screaming or something and he was quiet when I got there, and he became angry as soon as I took a couple of steps forward and that’s when he came at me,” said Carol.
One can only imagine how Ashley McDonald ended up in the road that fateful night. However, one thing is clear, Bryan McDonald is more than willing to attack and savagely beat innocent and vulnerable individuals, who mean only to do good. And, this threat to society is out on the loose.
Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/border-patrol-agent-severely-beats-elderly-couple-injured-woman/#Wxj82TKZHmzmJQVb.99
doublejj
Well-Known Member
I'll just leave this here.....
http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Man-s-F-K-COPS-face-tattoo-makes-him-easily-6715012.php
http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Man-s-F-K-COPS-face-tattoo-makes-him-easily-6715012.php
D528
Well-Known Member
Cop Charged With Murder and Manslaughter in 2 Separate Fatal Shootings Gets His Job Back
By Andrew Emett
Waverly, OH -- Indicted on five counts, including felony murder and reckless homicide, Pike County Deputy Joel Jenkins was officially reinstated on Tuesday after the sheriff recently fired him for shooting his neighbor to death while drunk. Although the police union fought to reinstate the negligent deputy, the sheriff refuses to place him back on duty or issue him another paycheck.
At 11:40 p.m. on December 3, Deputy Jenkins called the non-emergency line at the sheriff's office to report his neighbor, Jason Brady, 40, had been accidentally shot. Officers arrived to find Brady deceased with a bullet wound to the head. Clearly inebriated, Jenkins admitted to killing his neighbor while showing off a gun that he possibly received from Pike County Prosecutor Rob Junk.
Charged with involuntary manslaughter, Jenkins was arrested the next day and fired later that weekend. On December 10, a special grand jury indicted Jenkins for reckless homicide, involuntary manslaughter, and tampering with evidence in the case of his neighbor's death. According to neighbors, Brady used to feed and walk Jenkins' police dog.
Jenkins was also charged with felony murder and reckless homicide for the March 28 death of Robert Rooker, 26. Officers began pursuing Rooker for driving 52-mph in a 45-mph zone. After crashing his vehicle, Rooker died after Jenkins reportedly shot him to death. Placed on paid administrative leave for his involvement in Rooker's death, Jenkins was drunk and off-duty when he admittedly killed Brady a few months later.
Even though Pike County Sheriff Charles Reader fired Jenkins earlier this month, the police union representing the disgraced deputy fought to have Jenkins reinstated during a pre-disciplinary hearing on Tuesday. According to Catherine Brockman, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, Ohio Labor Council Inc., Sheriff Reader violated the union contract when he fired Jenkins without due process.
Although Reader declared he has no intention of ever paying Jenkins again, Pike County Labor Consultant Bob Cross stated, "We may owe the gentleman a few days pay."
Determined to fire Jenkins again, Reader believes the union is merely attempting to preserve some pay for the fallen deputy. But Reader announced, "He will never work in this department again."
Before joining the Pike County Sheriff's Office in 2012, Jenkins had briefly been a deputy in Fayette County. According to Fayette County Sheriff Vernon Stanforth, Jenkins had been reprimanded for driving his cruiser into an elderly man at a crosswalk.
---------------------
By Andrew Emett
Waverly, OH -- Indicted on five counts, including felony murder and reckless homicide, Pike County Deputy Joel Jenkins was officially reinstated on Tuesday after the sheriff recently fired him for shooting his neighbor to death while drunk. Although the police union fought to reinstate the negligent deputy, the sheriff refuses to place him back on duty or issue him another paycheck.
Charged with involuntary manslaughter, Jenkins was arrested the next day and fired later that weekend. On December 10, a special grand jury indicted Jenkins for reckless homicide, involuntary manslaughter, and tampering with evidence in the case of his neighbor's death. According to neighbors, Brady used to feed and walk Jenkins' police dog.
Jenkins was also charged with felony murder and reckless homicide for the March 28 death of Robert Rooker, 26. Officers began pursuing Rooker for driving 52-mph in a 45-mph zone. After crashing his vehicle, Rooker died after Jenkins reportedly shot him to death. Placed on paid administrative leave for his involvement in Rooker's death, Jenkins was drunk and off-duty when he admittedly killed Brady a few months later.
Even though Pike County Sheriff Charles Reader fired Jenkins earlier this month, the police union representing the disgraced deputy fought to have Jenkins reinstated during a pre-disciplinary hearing on Tuesday. According to Catherine Brockman, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, Ohio Labor Council Inc., Sheriff Reader violated the union contract when he fired Jenkins without due process.
Although Reader declared he has no intention of ever paying Jenkins again, Pike County Labor Consultant Bob Cross stated, "We may owe the gentleman a few days pay."
Determined to fire Jenkins again, Reader believes the union is merely attempting to preserve some pay for the fallen deputy. But Reader announced, "He will never work in this department again."
Before joining the Pike County Sheriff's Office in 2012, Jenkins had briefly been a deputy in Fayette County. According to Fayette County Sheriff Vernon Stanforth, Jenkins had been reprimanded for driving his cruiser into an elderly man at a crosswalk.
---------------------
D528
Well-Known Member
These Canadian gaurds can show u.s. cops how to arrest people without killing them. Good on them ! I dont have much to say of thier media though .lol.
Toronto Man Yells "F**k White People" During Machete Attack—Not Charged With Hate Crime
Christopher Menahan | InformationLiberation
A Toronto man who yelled "fuck white people" before launching an unprovoked machete attack on a random 30-year-old white male is being charged with attempted murder, aggravated assault, assault with a weapon, and possession of a weapon—but he is not being charged with a hate crime.
From CBC:
Toronto Police Sgt. Gale Corra said the two men had no previous contact and no history with each other.
"They may have just been crossing each other on the street," said Corra.
Police say they were called at 4:37 p.m. ET about the incident, which happened near Bay and Dundas streets.
A witness, Terence Yip, who works in technological support and maintenance for CBC, told CBC News that he was heading south on Bay Street when he heard yelling. He said one man was swinging at a man who was holding a guitar. Yip said a woman was yelling for police. He said a lot of people were in the area at the time.
Yip also tweeted that the attacker, a black man, yelled "F--k white people" before allegedly attacking the victim, who is white. He said the alleged attacker's machete was "probably the length of my arm. It was pretty big, a substantial weapon."
Yip said the man being attacked was on his back defending himself with his legs, while the man with the machete was swinging the knife at the man's legs.
"I've never seen anyone openly attack someone like that," said Yip. "It was extremely aggressive to the point where it was obvious that it was an attack."A bystander managed to break up the fight and buy enough time for the victim to escape without serious injury. A private security guard then tackled the suspect from behind and subdued him until police could arrive.
A commenter named "Kantata," who claims to have witnessed the attack, says the attacker, who has since been identified as 35-year-old Arlington Thompson, "was yelling 'No more white people! F*** white people! Down with white people!' over and over."
CP24 has video showing police taking the man down after the assault, Thompson can be heard muttering something about "white people" and shouting "stand up for yourself black people!"
Toronto Man Yells "F**k White People" During Machete Attack—Not Charged With Hate Crime
Christopher Menahan | InformationLiberation
A Toronto man who yelled "fuck white people" before launching an unprovoked machete attack on a random 30-year-old white male is being charged with attempted murder, aggravated assault, assault with a weapon, and possession of a weapon—but he is not being charged with a hate crime.
Toronto Police Sgt. Gale Corra said the two men had no previous contact and no history with each other.
"They may have just been crossing each other on the street," said Corra.
Police say they were called at 4:37 p.m. ET about the incident, which happened near Bay and Dundas streets.
A witness, Terence Yip, who works in technological support and maintenance for CBC, told CBC News that he was heading south on Bay Street when he heard yelling. He said one man was swinging at a man who was holding a guitar. Yip said a woman was yelling for police. He said a lot of people were in the area at the time.
Yip also tweeted that the attacker, a black man, yelled "F--k white people" before allegedly attacking the victim, who is white. He said the alleged attacker's machete was "probably the length of my arm. It was pretty big, a substantial weapon."
Yip said the man being attacked was on his back defending himself with his legs, while the man with the machete was swinging the knife at the man's legs.
"I've never seen anyone openly attack someone like that," said Yip. "It was extremely aggressive to the point where it was obvious that it was an attack."A bystander managed to break up the fight and buy enough time for the victim to escape without serious injury. A private security guard then tackled the suspect from behind and subdued him until police could arrive.
A commenter named "Kantata," who claims to have witnessed the attack, says the attacker, who has since been identified as 35-year-old Arlington Thompson, "was yelling 'No more white people! F*** white people! Down with white people!' over and over."
CP24 has video showing police taking the man down after the assault, Thompson can be heard muttering something about "white people" and shouting "stand up for yourself black people!"