cool its safe ...The unit has built in thermal cutoffs. So no cooling no light.
cool its safe ...The unit has built in thermal cutoffs. So no cooling no light.
It's she pretty?...........Lol, I know your right about ww/dr because I saw that pic too....Why would you think I have pics because I said I saw it. You'll see when it is released that I'm right.
I don't have it but a third party is testing the light with a radiospectrometer in Jan. Also it's same as cxb-8 spread wise just more intense. I don't even have one here or I'd test it myself. There is one addition to the maximizer that is super exciting that I'll do info on at launch. I'll definitely give a shout out to rui when I'm on the show again. I was so jet lagged and tired I didn't have any thoughts going in my head I was just answering questions. I'd been up for over 24 hrs at that point. To much for me lol.It's she pretty?...........Lol, I know your right about ww/dr because I saw that pic too....
let's see that maximizer 5x5 footprint chart braaaaaah
2Bonjour
Does your light have only one plug for the 6" duct?
Or is there two like on hodded reflector to be able to plug a carbon filter?
CU
I hear you, it pissed me off............still don't think this will be a 1k swap, but show us anyways.I don't have it but a third party is testing the light with a radiospectrometer in Jan. Also it's same as cxb-8 spread wise just more intense. I don't even have one here or I'd test it myself. There is one addition to the maximizer that is super exciting that I'll do info on at launch. I'll definitely give a shout out to rui when I'm on the show again. I was so jet lagged and tired I didn't have any thoughts going in my head I was just answering questions. I'd been up for over 24 hrs at that point. To much for me lol.
Hlg series meanwellsI hear you, it pissed me off............still don't think this will be a 1k swap, but show us anyways.
Next time you claim something, have data/testing to back it up.....like gg did with the at600 run.
Are you sealing the internals electronics? What drivers are you using?
It's amusing how hard some people will try to bust your balls over a lighting system you've been completely transparent about. Testing? As if there hasn't been enough done already to prove these combinations of chips and drivers?Hlg series meanwells
I hear you, it pissed me off............still don't think this will be a 1k swap, but show us anyways.
Next time you claim something, have data/testing to back it up.....like gg did with the at600 run.
Are you sealing the internals electronics? What drivers are you using?
Oh do please show me ANY run/test with the maximizer? ^STEVEN himself claimed on the show that it was a 1000w swap, so it was legitimate part of our discussion...I respectfully disagree with this entire argument (both sides). I don't think one side by side affords us any certainty with regard to the performance of either fixture. At all.
None.
To assume anything based on data from one controlled run is reckless.
But I also wouldn't buy Stevens fixture, or any other prefab for that matter. I don't think you can build&sell one for cheap enough for anyone to justify purchasing this over any of the cheaper options out there [let alone replacing perfectly good fixtures to save on energy].
$1700 for 225 parwatts. You'll never see a favorable ROI spending $7.55/parwatt. You barely see it spending $3.
Maybe when we see the AT600 beat the pants off HPS in a temperature controlled grow room with 100 different runs of 10 different strains at 10 different ambient temps, then we can start to feel comfortable making assertions.
At this point the best we can do is be honest about what's under the hood. And Steven certainly is. Just lose the 1000w replacement BS.
Oh do please show me ANY run/test with the maximizer? ^STEVEN himself claimed on the show that it was a 1000w swap, so it was legitimate part of our discussion...
I'm assuming watt for watt correct lol.Results shouldn't be so different than the PLC CXB 300
you don't get it, it's not about hating............it's about stating a 1000w hps swap without any PROOF in his specific SYSTEM, don't care if you find it amusing ...............you can jot this down next to mag ballast losses if you want,lolIt's amusing how hard some people will try to bust your balls over a lighting system you've been completely transparent about. Testing? As if there hasn't been enough done already to prove these combinations of chips and drivers?
The haters just make themselves look bad.
I get it; some of your lights run less efficiently than others, to hit a performance vs price point that makes sense in some situations and perhaps not others. Isn't that the point of choices?!
Isn't that for the buyer to decide, as opposed to a peanut gallery with a rather obvious motive for bashing your gear?
yeah, because they have identical ppf/w and LER right?Results shouldn't be so different than the PLC CXB 300
everyone knows how much I love assumptions around hereI'm assuming watt for watt correct lol.
The way I read what you said, I thought it didn't require a fan, I remembered you said it was passive. But yeah it does require a fan, you shouldn't say it passive then, just say "our lights require less air cooling, which reduce your overall energy usage by combining your grow rooms cooling with your lighting."The unit has built in thermal cutoffs. So no cooling no light. Also I am not trying to dodge the fact it requires a fan rather I was trying to relay how much wattage was actually driving the cobs.
I was trying to relay the power draw going to the cobs. In the video interview I plainly state it requires a minimum 70cfm cooling fan. They are just trying to bust my balls. These antics aren't new BTW. I assure you I'm not trying to fool anyone and every beta user has been plainly told they need to use a centrifugal fan. This unit we are referring to isn't even for sale and there is no mention of it on my site and in the video that is also stated. When I actually release the product I will make sure to relay it requires a fan.......The way I read what you said, I thought it didn't require a fan, I remembered you said it was passive. But yeah it does require a fan, you shouldn't say it passive then, just say "our lights require less air cooling, which reduce your overall energy usage by combining your grow rooms cooling with your lighting."
Yeah it was his other rental business. San Bernardino area. Police totally understaffed there apparently. Not a nice place to visit.Plants look great- wait a minute. A ROBBERY?!? WTF??? Is everyone okay?
I can go off and leave my home unlocked all day, and nothing would happen. I find that kind of community security worth the extra money to live here.Yeah it was his other rental business. San Bernardino area. Police totally understaffed there apparently. Not a nice place to visit.