Clinton is the next POTUS

[Red1966]

funny the only person talking about overturning CU..is Sanders.

I wouldn't count him out just yet..Desert Dumb Dumb.

Sanders is only window dressing. Hilary has it in the bag from the start.

 

[Red1966]

And was found innocent.

Liar. She was never charged. Big difference. Just shows how effective she is at covering up.

 

[Red1966]

If you think Clinton had "achievements" and none of them were actual, you're living in a fantasy land.

Name three.

 

[Red1966]

Democratic primary voting is DOWN? Where did you get that idea? Caucus attendance has been breaking records all over the place around here!

Not according to ABC. The Rep turnout is way up, the Dem turnout is way down. All the increase is in the Rep turnout. Perhaps you're substituting wishful thinking for fact?

 

[Red1966]

you are confusing debt with deficit/surplus.

congress passes a budget for X dollars. let's say 1Trillion. let's say clinton spent 800billion. so now there is a 200b surplus. if he spend 1.1T, then there would be a deficit of 100b.

the debt is still going up because let's say we only take in 900b vs the 1T budget. so we are constantly spending more than we take in.

You do realize the president doesn't set the budget?

 

[Red1966]

If Trump gets the nomination, Romney will most likely end up endorsing Hillary for president

Might be. I think he purposely lost his election.

 

[schuylaar]

Sanders is only window dressing. Hilary has it in the bag from the start.

liar.

 

[Red1966]

low wages.....

No, debt is a result of borrowing.

 

[bearkat42]

Name three.

Who, on the other side, would you consider more qualified or has accomplished more?

 

[Red1966]

liar.

Yet she has nearly all the delegates, despite how the votes came in. But I know how you disbelieve anything you don't want to hear.

 

[schuylaar]

Might be. I think he purposely lost his election.

those weren't tears of joy/relief when he realized polling was wrong..

tip: you need to poll all the people not just some..

 

[bearkat42]

Not according to ABC. The Rep turnout is way up, the Dem turnout is way down. All the increase is in the Rep turnout. Perhaps you're substituting wishful thinking for fact?

Since 1972, the party with a higher turnout in primaries has gone 4-7 in the general election.

-Nate Silver

 

[Red1966]

those weren't tears of joy/relief when he realized polling was wrong..

tip: you need to poll all the people not just some..

I was giving my opinion. Based on the facts he never brought up Obama's record and he stopped campaigning three weeks before the election. No "polls" were involved.

 

[schuylaar]

Yet she has nearly all the delegates, despite how the votes came in. But I know how you disbelieve anything you don't want to hear.

it's not over until it's over..

 

[schuylaar]

I was giving my opinion. Based on the facts he never brought up Obama's record and he stopped campaigning three weeks before the election. No "polls" were involved.

I disagree..according to the numbers he was led to believe by his campaign, he thought he had it in the bag which is why he took the time off smiling from his ski doo..he was one happy mofo:

 

[Red1966]

it's not over until it's over..

It's already over. You just prefer the fantasy.

 

[Red1966]

I disagree..according to the numbers he was led to believe by his campaign, he thought he had it in the bag which is why he took the time off smiling from his ski doo..he was one happy mofo:

View attachment 3624794

Even his campaign never believed he had more than a slight edge. I'm of the opinion he chose to lose.

 

[schuylaar]

Even his campaign never believed he had more than a slight edge. I'm of the opinion he chose to lose.

wrong..you have an extremely short nonfactual memory.

He believed his internal poll numbers November 2012..fact:

 

[Red1966]

wrong..you have an extremely short nonfactual memory.

He believed his internal poll numbers November 2012..fact:

View attachment 3624803

Those numbers look pretty "slight" to me. 3-4 points everywhere. SLIGHT lead in 2 states of 6, a loss in 4 states of 6. So your example poll shows him losing, yet you're trying to convince us that he assumed he was winning? You are terrible at proving a point.

 

[Red1966]

Sky, you habitually cite crap that disproves your arguments.