We add plentifull amounts of NPK and god only knows how much cal/mag, micro nutrients are needed in such small amounts you really have to try hard to get a deficiency in these, but i never hear any mention of sulfur.
It seems to be needed in large enough amounts as cal or mag and way more than your micro nutrients with confusing deficiencies that half resemble iron, zinc and nitrogen.
Just strange it gets little mention whatsoever....
I can't believe I missed this thread. Calcium and magnesium are not micro nutrients. They are both macro, as is S. Calcium is actually used more than phosphorous.
Sulfur to nutrient designers is usually used as a freedom variable. That means that while it's only needed at 30-40ppm, designers will often use slightly more or less to fine tune other elements (like magnesium, magnesium sulfate will give you sulfate as well).
To touch on your main point though, S simply isn't needed any higher than 30-60ppm (60 being pretty high). It's similar to P in that too much is a bad thing as it will antagonize other elements and make it more likely that your water turns cloudy. (P and S are both like this)
Mg is also needed at about 30-60ppm depending on how hungry the plant is for Mg, and much Ca and K you have already. (more Mg needed to balance the Ca and K) Mg:S ratio should be about 1:1