Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
And say you were arrested for possession of Marijuana in Texas, but you happen to be a Hindu Shaivite.
You could argue that you were both not willingly or knowingly breaking a law, and that you were actually pursuant to Title 5 Chapter 110, which states that any act done or omitted for Religious purposes is legal, unless the Government can prove that restricting such action is in furtherance of a compelling Governmental interest, and is the least restrictive means of achieving that compelling Governmental interest. So you just have to be able to prove that there is a less restrictive mean of stopping illegal use of Marijuana, while you legally use Marijuana Religiously. Such as a location, or Temple, or ceremony.
You could argue that you were both not willingly or knowingly breaking a law, and that you were actually pursuant to Title 5 Chapter 110, which states that any act done or omitted for Religious purposes is legal, unless the Government can prove that restricting such action is in furtherance of a compelling Governmental interest, and is the least restrictive means of achieving that compelling Governmental interest. So you just have to be able to prove that there is a less restrictive mean of stopping illegal use of Marijuana, while you legally use Marijuana Religiously. Such as a location, or Temple, or ceremony.