EXCUSE ME?!..The OFFICIAL Bernie Sanders For President 2016 Thread

doublejj said:
This country was founded for Corporations & needs corporations today as much as ever. Look what Elon Musk is doing at SpaceX & Tesla & SolarCity. We need to work on the regulations that keep corporations here & are fare to American workers......this ain't rocket science
Click to expand...
I do agree with that they just need to pay a worker a beater wage so the worker can have a life for him and his family..I told you that you was a good man hell if I live by you you mite even teach me beater spellingLOL ..ky
 
doublejj said:
This country was founded for Corporations & needs corporations today as much as ever. Look what Elon Musk is doing at SpaceX & Tesla & SolarCity. We need to work on the regulations that keep corporations here & are fare to American workers......this ain't rocket science
Click to expand...

Agreed on all counts. The philosophy should be how corporations work FOR people, not the other way around.
 
And that pig looks great and so dos the people having a great time togeather as it should be.i cant wait to be a part of that big family...ky
 
Flaming Pie said:
That makes no sense. If bernie backs hillary, that would make him a fraud.
Click to expand...
doublejj said:
You guys should take an early American history class next semester. This country was formed buy & for corporations. The original 13 colonies were Corporation States that formed a business charter for mutual support against Brittan....
Click to expand...
Corporations with stock that are legally treated as people didn't come into existence until Andrew Jackson was prez. It was at that time the soulless and immortal company came into existence. Until then, companies were privately held and under the ownership usually of one person or a family that had a human stake in the concern and people working for it. This is still very much the norm in Europe. But not here. There is no real reason why we should put the rights of companies at the same level as people.
 
Fogdog said:
Corporations with stock that are legally treated as people didn't come into existence until Andrew Jackson was prez. It was at that time the soulless and immortal company came into existence. Until then, companies were privately held and under the ownership usually of one person or a family that had a human stake in the concern and people working for it. This is still very much the norm in Europe. But not here. There is no real reason why we should put the rights of companies at the same level as people.
Click to expand...

...and there are lots of really good reasons NOT to.

Corporate personhood is a concept that is quite simply corrosive to democracy itself.
 
doublejj said:
all this corporate bashing....what brand of phone are you typing this on?
Click to expand...

Link the post where I said I hate corporations. You won't find one, because the corporations themselves aren't the problem; it's corporate governance and the regulatory environment that's gone off the rails.

Google the term 'regulatory capture' and you'll see what I mean. That's one example, by no means exhaustive.
 
doublejj said:
You guys should take an early American history class next semester. This country was formed buy & for corporations. The original 13 colonies were Corporation States that formed a business charter for mutual support against Brittan....
Click to expand...

But now "our" Corps have formed alliances with foreign governments for mutual support against The Union. (see Boeing) (see Congress).
 
Grandpapy said:
But now "our" Corps have formed alliances with foreign governments for mutual support against The Union. (see Boeing) (see Congress).
Click to expand...

And this is exactly the kind of shit we need to elect Mr Sanders to stop. He won't do it FOR us, but he'll use the Presidential bully pulpit and provide a rallying point for citizens of our nation to do the heavy lifting and handle the details.

Reinstate Glass-Steagall!

Vive la Sandernista revolution!
 
bravedave said:
I do read a bunch. And remember what I read...like nowhere in the article are taxes said to be regressive. So you have nothing? Your article may be interesting but the point is the fact that Bernie is more Mussolini than Sven.
Click to expand...
Oh no, it said that poor people pay higher rates. Regressive taxation. And totally not true.
 
Fogdog said:
Oh no, it said that poor people pay higher rates. Regressive taxation. And totally not true.
Click to expand...
No it did not. It just said our poor pay less. Not an example of regressive taxation but more an example of your lack of understanding.
 
Last edited:
Fogdog said:
Oh no, it said that poor people pay higher rates. Regressive taxation. And totally not true.
Click to expand...

Anything to distract from the fact that taxes are regressive as FUCK here in the States!

And the mass media outlets wonder why no one pays attention to them anymore.

They might try telling the UNVARNISHED truth, for a change.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top