Donald Trump Named in Lawsuit for Raping Teenage Girl

T

ThickStemz

Well-Known Member
Elwood Diggler said:
you said....."You`re right though Bill was on trial for getting BJ`s in the White house with interns"

he clearly wasn't on trial for getting blowjobs. see how it works? you misconstrue and get skooled. just another day at riu.

at the point he broke the law and lied, that's the fucking legal cause skippy. proximate cause would be the lie as the blowjob wasn't illegal and isn't a legally recognizable injury. if he hadn't of lied then there's no impeachment since he hadn't, at the point of the lie, committed an impeachable offense.
Click to expand...
It's splitting hairs.

Sure, the legal cause was the lie. Everyone knows that. Or everyone should.

You can't claim I didn't know that. It was in my first response to you here.

But to say the action he lied about isn't a cause at all, well then what reason was there for the lie?
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
bluntmassa1 said:
CNN is owned by Time Warner one of the biggest donators for Hillary Clinton. $150k ain't shit they want Hillary they paid Hillary.

Maybe if your dick worked you would not be so fucking stupid...
Click to expand...
oh come on,

Are you still making up facts? So, Time Warner is a huge business and of course huge businesses are lining up to donate to the campaign of the next President. We all know how this goes, and it's not any different from other campaigns in the past, left or right. That a mega corp. would donate to a candidate does not differentiate Hillary from Trump, so I don't see where you are going with this.

If Hillary's views and policies are favorable to TW, then yes, I'd say she will get preferred treatment from CNN and big donations. But it doesn't have anything to do with the donation by itself. Do you understand how cooperation works?

Trump's big fat mouth, his misogynistic, or racist or bigoted or uncivil remarks make corporations very careful about putting their name in the list of big donors to him. This and the fact that he really hasn't done anything to build a campaign organization is a real limitation to his fund raising. I'm guessing the next shoe to drop is how Hillary has an "unfair" advantage over Trump when it comes to campaign budget. This might be true and I'd rather we put limits on campaign contributions from mega corporations but Republicans have been the main obstacle to prevent it from happening. So, Trump and his party can stew in their own juices.

Once the Democrats control the Senate, maybe we can start working on a fix to the problems caused by the GOP stacked Supreme Court who gave the 1% the favor of the Citizen's United.

And from what I've observed from shit happening, a man isn't any smarter when his dick is fully functional. In fact, he can act pretty stupid when thinking through it.
 
bluntmassa1

bluntmassa1

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
oh come on,

Are you still making up facts? So, Time Warner is a huge business and of course huge businesses are lining up to donate to the campaign of the next President. We all know how this goes, and it's not any different from other campaigns in the past, left or right. That a mega corp. would donate to a candidate does not differentiate Hillary from Trump, so I don't see where you are going with this.

If Hillary's views and policies are favorable to TW, then yes, I'd say she will get preferred treatment from CNN and big donations. But it doesn't have anything to do with the donation by itself. Do you understand how cooperation works?

Trump's big fat mouth, his misogynistic, or racist or bigoted or uncivil remarks make corporations very careful about putting their name in the list of big donors to him. This and the fact that he really hasn't done anything to build a campaign organization is a real limitation to his fund raising. I'm guessing the next shoe to drop is how Hillary has an "unfair" advantage over Trump when it comes to campaign budget. This might be true and I'd rather we put limits on campaign contributions from mega corporations but Republicans have been the main obstacle to prevent it from happening. So, Trump and his party can stew in their own juices.

Once the Democrats control the Senate, maybe we can start working on a fix to the problems caused by the GOP stacked Supreme Court who gave the 1% the favor of the Citizen's United.

And from what I've observed from shit happening, a man isn't any smarter when his dick is fully functional. In fact, he can act pretty stupid when thinking through it.
Click to expand...
I was more trying to prove the point that if Trump raped a little girl it would be on CNN but Uncle Troll believes everything he sees on the internet.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
bluntmassa1 said:
I was more trying to prove the point that if Trump raped a little girl it would be on CNN but Uncle Troll believes everything he sees on the internet.
Click to expand...
Could it be that the story doesn't meet reporting standards for CNN? Trump has enough distasteful and criminal history that are well documented without this rather thin story. If it's true, then the story will develop but otherwise, it sounds too much like the made up shit wingnuts dredge up regarding Hillary.
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
ThickStemz said:
The president actually does very little to make the economy good or bad.
Click to expand...
That is explicitly and unequivocally not true. Common sense and the obvious prove this idea false.

ThickStemz said:
The economy is a function of mainly perspective and uncontrollable events.
Click to expand...
Again, not true at all. You have no idea what you are talking about.

ThickStemz said:
The president gets too much credit and too much blame.
Click to expand...
I can somewhat agree with you on this. However this statement can quickly and easily be led down a straw man path.

ThickStemz said:
Trump can make America great again If he can inspire people.
Click to expand...
Try harder. What specifically will he do? Are you having a hard time with the word "specifically"?
 
Last edited:
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Could it be that the story doesn't meet reporting standards for CNN? Trump has enough distasteful and criminal history that are well documented without this rather thin story. If it's true, then the story will develop but otherwise, it sounds too much like the made up shit wingnuts dredge up regarding Hillary.
Click to expand...
Take event A use event B and tie it in to event C.
None of the events need to be related
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
bluntmassa1 said:
CNN is owned by Time Warner one of the biggest donators for Hillary Clinton. $150k ain't shit they want Hillary they paid Hillary.

Maybe if your dick worked you would not be so fucking stupid...
Click to expand...
The donations that came from Time Warner, like many donations are from individual contributors. In the case of Time Warner, individuals within the company chose to donate to Hillary Clinton to the tune of $578,170. And Time Warner itself (ie. the CEO) gave $25,000 to the PAC.

Trump, who's son goes to the private school of which the CNN executive's wife oversees donated directly to her $150,000 for charitable contributions.

Last time I checked, $150,000 is greater than $25,000.

Individual contributors does not mean the same thing as Time Warner itself, and certainly does not mean the wife of the CNN executive.

And by the way, the $578,170 and $25,000 figures are from 1996 to 2016. And cover all campaign activity from that 20 year time period.

Stop getting your information from Fox, they lie to you. Do your own research, it will make you look smarter.

Edit: Your tiny penis is tiny, however not nearly as tiny as your brain.
 
Last edited:
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
see4 said:
The donations that came from Time Warner, like many donations are from individual contributors. In the case of Time Warner, individuals within the company chose to donate to Hillary Clinton to the tune of $578,170. And Time Warner itself (ie. the CEO) gave $25,000 to the PAC.

Trump, who's son goes to the private school of which the CNN executive's wife oversees donated directly to her $150,000 for charitable contributions.

Last time I checked, $150,000 is greater than $25,000.

Individual contributors does not mean the same thing as Time Warner itself, and certainly does not mean the wife of the CNN executive.

And by the way, the $578,170 and $25,000 figures are from 1996 to 2016. And cover all campaign activity from that 20 year time period.

Stop getting your information from Fox, they lie to you. Do your own research, it will make you look smarter.

Edit: Your tiny penis is tiny, however not nearly as tiny as your brain.
Click to expand...
I like and agree with you, See4; however, I disagree with one small assertion, and that is that while $25k < $150,000, and the CEO's contribution was personal, in spite of all that, these people are in charge of or have strong influence over the media. Fuck both the retard AND the traitor. They are both subversive pieces of shit. And anyone with influence over media that should be neutral and informative regarding the presidential election, not contributing to them through both cash and exaggerated positive report or slanderous media coverage, should be called out on being subversive as well. Fuck Time Warner, fuck CNN, fuck that traitor, Clinton, and fuck that retard, Trump.
 
see4

see4

Well-Known Member
Olive Drab Green said:
I like and agree with you, See4; however, I disagree with one small assertion, and that is that while $25k < $150,000, and the CEO's contribution was personal, in spite of all that, these people are in charge of or have strong influence over the media. Fuck both the retard AND the traitor. They are both subversive pieces of shit. And anyone with influence over media that should be neutral and informative regarding the presidential election, not contributing to them through both cash and exaggerated positive report or slanderous media coverage, should be called out on being subversive as well. Fuck Time Warner, fuck CNN, fuck that traitor, Clinton, and fuck that retard, Trump.
Click to expand...
For the most part, I agree. Hillary is a shill for the establishment and she is tough on guns. And Trump is a thug. And I also agree, CNN is shit and so is Time Warner.

However, when talking about campaign contributions specifically, the figures are clear. $580k comes from individual contributors, employees who fill out a form once a year promising to donate some small amount of money to a candidate on behalf of Time Warner. I did the same thing while I worked at IBM. That does not mean that IBM shares the same opinion about a candidate as I do, nor does its executives. And the $580k figure is over a 20 year period. The individual contributors have no influence whatsoever on the media, they do what they are told. The figure to focus on is the $25,000, which I did, and you've rightfully done above. That number is Time Warners contribution to Hillary over a 20 year period. And that was approved by a Time Warner executive. Again, 25k is less than 150k. In which I've established a tighter connection between Trump and CNN than with Hillary and CNN. That and the fact common sense tells us that CNN is right wing leaning network anyway. Not gunna lie though, this Bewkes (the CEO) character fits the bill of a Democrat for sure.
 
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
see4 said:
For the most part, I agree. Hillary is a shill for the establishment and she is tough on guns. And Trump is a thug. And I also agree, CNN is shit and so is Time Warner.

However, when talking about campaign contributions specifically, the figures are clear. $580k comes from individual contributors, employees who fill out a form once a year promising to donate some small amount of money to a candidate on behalf of Time Warner. I did the same thing while I worked at IBM. That does not mean that IBM shares the same opinion about a candidate as I do, nor does its executives. And the $580k figure is over a 20 year period. The individual contributors have no influence whatsoever on the media, they do what they are told. The figure to focus on is the $25,000, which I did, and you've rightfully done above. That number is Time Warners contribution to Hillary over a 20 year period. And that was approved by a Time Warner executive. Again, 25k is less than 150k. In which I've established a tighter connection between Trump and CNN than with Hillary and CNN. That and the fact common sense tells us that CNN is right wing leaning network anyway. Not gunna lie though, this Bewkes (the CEO) character fits the bill of a Democrat for sure.
Click to expand...
Oh, 20 years? That doesn't really constitute support, I suppose.
 
Elwood Diggler

Elwood Diggler

Well-Known Member
ThickStemz said:
It's splitting hairs.

Sure, the legal cause was the lie. Everyone knows that. Or everyone should.

You can't claim I didn't know that. It was in my first response to you here.

But to say the action he lied about isn't a cause at all, well then what reason was there for the lie?
Click to expand...

i can claim that. you stated he was on trial for a blowjob. your argument got blown up and you'll go on for days trying to be right,
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top