And he won't, because he hasn't done any real work. He picks and chooses examples he believes, discards everything that doesn't fit. The shame is he hasn't tested the ideas. He is a Cliff's Notes type guy; too lazy to read the real stuff, he'll just read the abstract. If he had done the real work, he'd see that the subject requires an open mind and a necessity to consider numerous variables. His explanation of Coriolis on bullets was laughable; no consideration of temperature, air density, humidity, layered wind patterns