Smoking sativa, don't like it

sativa or indica

  • sativa

    Votes: 11 57.9%
  • indica

    Votes: 4 21.1%
  • mainy

    Votes: 3 15.8%
  • pooped down the toilet

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • just let it go

    Votes: 1 5.3%

  • Total voters
    19

bluntmassa1

Well-Known Member
This one? I want to read this. Does he cite sources for genetic research?

I forget what the new book is called but he mentions it in these videos as well as the broad leaf narrow leaf shit. Haven't actually read the book yet it costs almost a hundred bucks. Lol, but he talks about it their and I've seen him in other videos.

I think he knows what he's talking about but it's going to be a long time before people stop saying Indica and Sativa the myth is too strong. Lol
 

tezzerLad

Active Member
We all like different buzzes, but you should try some overly powerful sativa edibles....way better than shrooms :D
can we keep on topic pls, 'i don't like sativa' thank you.

this is the reason i don't like it because i feel like i'm slightly on shrooms when i smoke it.


:lol:
 

GardenGnome83

Well-Known Member

I forget what the new book is called but he mentions it in these videos as well as the broad leaf narrow leaf shit. Haven't actually read the book yet it costs almost a hundred bucks. Lol, but he talks about it their and I've seen him in other videos.

I think he knows what he's talking about but it's going to be a long time before people stop saying Indica and Sativa the myth is too strong. Lol
I read his theory too. Ruderalis and sativa switched, and indica is now afghanica I believe. This is all great, but there is no way the terms will really change. It's too deep. Maybe it shouldn't change, as there is a global consensus as to what's what.
$100 for a book is way too much.
 

bluntmassa1

Well-Known Member
I read his theory too. Ruderalis and sativa switched, and indica is now afghanica I believe. This is all great, but there is no way the terms will really change. It's too deep. Maybe it shouldn't change, as there is a global consensus as to what's what.
$100 for a book is way too much.
I'm sure a lot of things will change come legalization when people really start to work with it. Like what actually makes Sativa more of an energetic high? It must be in the cannabinoids or terpines otherwise it's psychological.

Things will change that's for sure they always do. I just can't wait until we have some real breeders get into the business and breed some sick shit.
 

cat of curiosity

Well-Known Member
What part of "generally" didn't you get? Hemp is somewhat of a generic term itself relating to any cannabis grown for industrial purposes. I can't find anything saying there's ruderalis in matanuska thunderfuck anyway.

https://www.leafly.com/sativa/matanuska-thunder-fuck

http://en.seedfinder.eu/strain-info/Matanuska_Thunderfuck/Unknown_or_Legendary/
generally means 'mostly', and that is just plain wrong? i get generally, do you?

hemp is generic, but it also has a definition (relating to fiber content).

have you ever had, grown, or even seen thunderfuck? the real shit is rare, and flowers under 24 hours of light (wow, must be the only shit in alaska that can bloom outdoors, huh?). done and dead at 4 weeks in a flower room, low yield, high resin content. 100% ruderalis. i'd hate to try and get fibers, as they usually don't even get 2 feet tall... not much in the way of fiber, kinda a waste of time maybe?

ruderalis=hemp.... my ass!

generally speaking....
 

WeedFreak78

Well-Known Member
generally means 'mostly', and that is just plain wrong? i get generally, do you?

hemp is generic, but it also has a definition (relating to fiber content).

have you ever had, grown, or even seen thunderfuck? the real shit is rare, and flowers under 24 hours of light (wow, must be the only shit in alaska that can bloom outdoors, huh?). done and dead at 4 weeks in a flower room, low yield, high resin content. 100% ruderalis. i'd hate to try and get fibers, as they usually don't even get 2 feet tall... not much in the way of fiber, kinda a waste of time maybe?

ruderalis=hemp.... my ass!

generally speaking....
True ruderalis isn't hemp, I'll give you that, but most of the ruderalis we've been familiar with in the past is due to industrial uses. Usually ruderalis/sativa crosses. So I'm still saying it's, generally, hemp. Only recently, last 20 years or so, has true ruderalis become popular, again, but this time due to the medical movements and the popularity of autoflowers.

I've smoked MTF before, supposedly. I know nothing about it except is lore, and what I've read. Nothing says anything about ruderalis. There's no reason someone couldn't have just isolated and bred a short flowing indica.
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
can we keep on topic pls, 'i don't like sativa' thank you.

this is the reason i don't like it because i feel like i'm slightly on shrooms when i smoke it.


:lol:
Hey, Matthew! It's been a while. Does anyone else recognize the distinctive prose style? This time he even gives us his identity as a choice in the op poll, "Mainy". Good stuff, mainliner. How have you been?
 

cat of curiosity

Well-Known Member
True ruderalis isn't hemp, I'll give you that, but most of the ruderalis we've been familiar with in the past is due to industrial uses. Usually ruderalis/sativa crosses. So I'm still saying it's, generally, hemp. Only recently, last 20 years or so, has true ruderalis become popular, again, but this time due to the medical movements and the popularity of autoflowers.

I've smoked MTF before, supposedly. I know nothing about it except is lore, and what I've read. Nothing says anything about ruderalis. There's no reason someone couldn't have just isolated and bred a short flowing indica.
no reason, surely.

other than the hell's angels keeping gaurd on it like they have for years and years... yeah, that doesn't count...

all of your autos are either ruderalis or a hybrid ruderalis.

homework mother fucker, do you do it? ain't my first fuckin' picnic...
 
Top