How much? Do you want so much of it that you'll never spend it all, even knowing that many thousands suffer grinding poverty because of it? I couldn't have that on my conscience, yet that's how real wealth is often gained; through coercive means, by fiat.
Lets not get all carried away, I am way to generous a person to not share everything I have, and I do, including donating 100's of hours a year on medical missions here and abroad...
Nah, you just can't read because you're too lazy, so you actually have no fucking clue what I said. You just keep spewing out your little buzzwords because you have no actual counterpoints to my assertions. You just want to keep moving the goalposts. I just refuse to keep going back and forth with someone who has about as much intellectual originality as a knock-off barbie doll and won't even give the common respect of reading things in their entirety before forming a strong opinion and responding based on that. You're just a little, angry person who doesn't really give a shit about actual discussions if you can't shape them into your little diatribes about imperialism. Keep telling me what I said when you didn't even read it. Try to quote a single thing I said in "Vigorous defense" of the crowdpac ranking. Besides the fact that you have already shown a complete lack of intellectual capacity when the best argument against something you have is "it's retarded", you also conflate my explaining the specific flaws of just the graph you posted and the website it is from with me somehow saying ALL two axis graphs are wrong (something I have repeatedly stated is not the case, as I have repeatedly stated my preference for even more than 2 axes). But you couldn't be bothered to read enough to figure that out, and since this is probably ALSO tl:dr for your stunted little mind to work through, I doubt you'll figure it out even after this, and will probably just respond, again, with some ignorant bullshit.
It was an existentialist question, not an accusation.
I don't know, I know I would be giving a lot of money away to people in need, set up some nice homes for a bunch of veterans, sanctuary's for the unwanted, feed as many people as I could, adopt a bunch more kids...my list is endless..
So wtf is wrong with those who actually DO have great wealth? You and I seem to have a reasonably decent moral compass, so what is it about them that makes them feel above such obligations to their less fortunate fellows?
Logic really isn't your standpoint. Just because I boil your emotional diatribes down to the only part I feel like responding to doesn't mean I can't read. Ironically, your habit of distorting my arguments is sound evidence that you're either terrible at employing logic or that you in fact, do not have much skill in reading comprehension. I wager it is both.
I have no idea, it is sad, selfish, and to have so much and do so little they really are very alone in the world..
Is it just me or are right wingers generally not too sharp with the logic and/or critical thinking skills?
This might help explain their ofttimes belligerent, polemic and shrill tones when dealing with others.
Cognitive ability has been negatively correlated with right wing ideology by peer reviewed research.Is it just me or are right wingers generally not too sharp with the logic and/or critical thinking skills?
Doth thou wonder if mayhap this be not the coincidence it seems?
While true in broad strokes, I'm quite certain there are the minority operators who run the show to serve their own ends, and are every bit as smart as they are cynical.
Considering that you still haven't accurately represented a single point I have made, I'll continue to trust the evidence that you lack basic reading comprehension. I am done trying to explain myself when you lack the ability to understand it.
It's not that I lack the ability to understand it, it is that it is either part of some emotional diatribe or impertinent to the debate or simply a distortion of my arguments. This is why I just stay on point and ridicule your RETARDED FUCKING GRAPH.
Because that's all you have. "Retarded, retarded, retarded", and If it's not what you want to talk about, it's not part of the debate. Grow up.
I would like to talk about how retarded your graph is, you know, the one with a scale from Liberal to Conservative, excluding everything else.
Cool beans, talk about it all you want.
Yes, narrow the debate to the one thing you can say shit about, call it "retarded" every chance you get, and ignore everything the other person says. Win!
