doublejj
Well-Known Member
That's between Hillary, Monica, & Bill........as it should be......butt out!!I wonder if Monica was waiting in the wings that night this picture was taken?
That's between Hillary, Monica, & Bill........as it should be......butt out!!I wonder if Monica was waiting in the wings that night this picture was taken?
Thank you for that very valuable and insightful posting.Trump is a piece of shit, I wouldnt vote for him either.
Oh wait, I bet you must be one of those who think because there is a D/R next to a name it blinds me to what a piece of shit they are... Nope. Both of them are pieces of shit and neither deserves a vote.
So you say that the complaints against Hillary are disingenuous and not based on fact?no, i think your claim is disingenuous and not based in fact.
Did you know that Trump raped a child four times? With people watching too. Yuck.
does your posting of this meme have anything to do with your adherence to white supremacist phillipe rushton?
Rushton, haven't heard that name in a while.does your posting of this meme have anything to do with your adherence to white supremacist phillipe rushton?
He is being accused of rape with a "witness". He hasn't been charged for it. Funny how buck will latch onto anything and beat it like a dead horse. Its apparent I am no longer going to keep up the debate on that subject with him.Did you know that Trump raped a child four times? With people watching too. Yuck.
well, barnyardboybefuckingasheep decided that he was going to hold him up as some kind of hero. so i'll be throwing it back in his face for a while.Rushton, haven't heard that name in a while.
isn't this the third time he has been accused of rape? didn't he settle one of the others for a big pile of hush money?He is being accused of rape with a "witness". He hasn't been charged for it. Funny how buck will latch onto anything and beat it like a dead horse. Its apparent I am no longer going to keep up the debate on that subject with him.
Umm, so, Hillary has been under investigation for like 18 months with up to 1500 FBI agents involved in the investigation. They went through and re-created the files that were erased. Interviewed everybody involved including Hillary. At the end of the investigation found no evidence of criminal intent. None.He is being accused of rape with a "witness". He hasn't been charged for it. Funny how buck will latch onto anything and beat it like a dead horse. Its apparent I am no longer going to keep up the debate on that subject with him.
More like witless, thought free.there was no intent.... so I am guilt free.
I don't hold him up as a hero I just looked through his study and agreed on it. You don't see me going through different threads bringing his name upwell, barnyardboybefuckingasheep decided that he was going to hold him up as some kind of hero. so i'll be throwing it back in his face for a while.
If this is true you know my stance on rapist, so I don't think I'm voting this year. I find neither candidate worthy of the position.isn't this the third time he has been accused of rape? didn't he settle one of the others for a big pile of hush money?
This style of ass speaking analogy is good practice for when its time to explain trump getting crushed.
Except for the inconvenient reality that "intent" has absolutely nothing to do with the laws that were broken. It's a wonderful strawman that was set up and knocked down, but accidentally putting classified documents at risk, even without being aware you did it, is prosecutable, let alone negligence. Anyone who has ever had a real security clearance has had that relayed to them countless times as a condition of their clearance. We used to have quarterly training that was the same monotonous shit over and over, I'm sure the regs haven't loosened that much since the early 90's, I would think they became more restrictive.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-emails-james-comey_us_577be20be4b041646410be0d
the FBI found no criminal intent to leak classified information — the gravamen of the case — Comey expressed appropriate contempt for Clinton’s venality, carelessness and disregard for government processes. It just wasn’t illegal.
If venality and carelessness were criminal then we'd have a much larger prison population wouldn't we?
He also said no criminal intent, -- not the kind of behavior where charges can be pressed. Yet you hang onto it like a dog with a bone. You just think she should be indicted because, well I can't explain it.
By your standard, Trump is a child rapist.
I don't see a problem with this excuse. The police use it all of the time.
yep, it's me bringing up your lov for the guy because i want you tied as closely as possible to that white supremacist.I don't hold him up as a hero I just looked through his study and agreed on it. You don't see me going through different threads bringing his name up
then why don't they prosecute?putting classified documents at risk, even without being aware you did it, is prosecutable
Are you a lawyer? I'm not. I only know what I read.Except for the inconvenient reality that "intent" has absolutely nothing to do with the laws that were broken. It's a wonderful strawman that was set up and knocked down, but accidentally putting classified documents at risk, even without being aware you did it, is prosecutable, let alone negligence. Anyone who has ever had a real security clearance has had that relayed to them countless times as a condition of their clearance. We used to have quarterly training that was the same monotonous shit over and over, I'm sure the regs haven't loosened that much since the early 90's, I would think they became more restrictive.
There is no "love" for him. It's evolution that gave the study credibility (In my eyes), if you believe we all evolved equally you may be more ignorant than I first thought to be.yep, it's me bringing up your lov for the guy because i want you tied as closely as possible to that white supremacist.