Apparently private companies like SpaceX and Stratolaunch are the future of space travel, despite NASAs huge head start and funding. What happened?
capitalism
NASA pioneered space travel, companies like SpaceX piggyback off of NASA (& ESA) successes
why would they have to alter the data? we're going through the hottest year on record by far (again).
NASA was so sucessful it went out of the shuttle business... And they were not even required to make a profit... LOL!!
What other agency has landed on the Moon?
NASA is an organization. The people that got us to the moon have long since retired. Now they are a political arm of the global warming agenda... THANKS OBAMA!!!
They don't even deny they went back and changed 100+ years of temperature data. This is not conspiracy, its open data that they will admit. The way they frame it, is that climate scientists create "computer models" that predict how temperature should be according to CO2 emissions or whatever theory they have on global temperature. Then if that data doesn't fit they go back in history and "adjust" it, basically saying that our carbon theory says this, so the previous data must be wrong if it doesn't fit with out computer model so we are going to adjust it because the old equipment was probably wrong or whatever. So the new temperature data we are hearing about it starts off as some raw temperature measurement from a weather station somewhere, then its run through the really smart climate scientists computer to "fix" it, and then this is the final data they release to the news sites and documented as final temperature. As mentioned, they have also gone back in history before computers even existed to fix the data to better meet their expectations or desired results (whatever you call it).
realclimatescience.com is a much better website than fakeclimatescience.com in my opinion.They don't even deny they went back and changed 100+ years of temperature data. This is not conspiracy, its open data that they will admit. The way they frame it, is that climate scientists create "computer models" that predict how temperature should be according to CO2 emissions or whatever theory they have on global temperature. Then if that data doesn't fit they go back in history and "adjust" it, basically saying that our carbon theory says this, so the previous data must be wrong if it doesn't fit with out computer model so we are going to adjust it because the old equipment was probably wrong or whatever. So the new temperature data we are hearing about it starts off as some raw temperature measurement from a weather station somewhere, then its run through the really smart climate scientists computer to "fix" it, and then this is the final data they release to the news sites and documented as final temperature. As mentioned, they have also gone back in history before computers even existed to fix the data to better meet their expectations or desired results (whatever you call it).
http://realclimatescience.com/history-of-nasanoaa-temperature-corruption/
Also, I see no reason why this should be a political issue at all. Science is "science" and operates regardless of what your opinion is. However, realistically it has become a modern political issue I think mainly because Al Gore (politician) spearheaded his movie and forced it into the mainstream. Since then, its become a kind of political football around the world.
Also, Al Gore's net worth was about 1 Million in 2000 when he ran for president. Currently it is closer to 200 Million. He did quite well for himself off the climate change horse (is he really selfless trying to save the world, or looking to personally profit, or does it not matter?)
NASA lies about evidence of extraterrestrial life, not having gone to the moon.
Do you really think NASA hasn't landed on the moon? Really?
You chose to quote a post where I said they dont lie about having gone to the moon? If I was unclear, I apologize, but in that quote I meant they cover up ET evidence, but they actually did go to the moon so they don't lie about it.
OK, sorry. I misunderstood. I'm quite high.
Have you heard about the Negro Space Program? Its part of history that is covered up. I suppose they had it because of separate but equal laws of the time.OK, sorry. I misunderstood. I'm quite high.
They don't even deny they went back and changed 100+ years of temperature data. This is not conspiracy, its open data that they will admit. The way they frame it, is that climate scientists create "computer models" that predict how temperature should be according to CO2 emissions or whatever theory they have on global temperature. Then if that data doesn't fit they go back in history and "adjust" it, basically saying that our carbon theory says this, so the previous data must be wrong if it doesn't fit with out computer model so we are going to adjust it because the old equipment was probably wrong or whatever. So the new temperature data we are hearing about it starts off as some raw temperature measurement from a weather station somewhere, then its run through the really smart climate scientists computer to "fix" it, and then this is the final data they release to the news sites and documented as final temperature. As mentioned, they have also gone back in history before computers even existed to fix the data to better meet their expectations or desired results (whatever you call it).
http://realclimatescience.com/history-of-nasanoaa-temperature-corruption/
Also, I see no reason why this should be a political issue at all. Science is "science" and operates regardless of what your opinion is. However, realistically it has become a modern political issue I think mainly because Al Gore (politician) spearheaded his movie and forced it into the mainstream. Since then, its become a kind of political football around the world.
Also, Al Gore's net worth was about 1 Million in 2000 when he ran for president. Currently it is closer to 200 Million. He did quite well for himself off the climate change horse (is he really selfless trying to save the world, or looking to personally profit, or does it not matter?)
is your rebuttal to the consensus of scientists worldwide "BUT THE X FILES!"?
Can you explain the middle part?
