captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
Anybody still believe this guy is sane?
http://www.vox.com/2016/8/9/12415644/donald-trump-second-amendment-joke
http://www.vox.com/2016/8/9/12415644/donald-trump-second-amendment-joke
For someone claiming to be anti-gun, look how fast you call for fully armed government groups to invade citizens homes.perhaps it is time we start sending the secret service, CIA, ATF, FBI, and other agencies to the homes of these heavily armed people just to make sure they are not up to any terrorist attacks.
I agree that heavily armed white males are the biggest terrorist threat. Every day I thank god that I am a bi-sexual asian girl.inciting people to shoot federal judges?
i believe that desert dude was crying about how his white supremacist buddies got raided and arrested for doing the exact same thing a while back.
perhaps it is time we start sending the secret service, CIA, ATF, FBI, and other agencies to the homes of these heavily armed people just to make sure they are not up to any terrorist attacks.
after all, heavily armed right wing white males are the biggest terror threat this country faces by a long shot.
we can never be too safe. even if it means increased surveillance of white males.
i bet you have the nicest vagenisI agree that heavily armed white males are the biggest terrorist threat. Every day I thank glad that I am a bi-sexual asian girl.
Anybody still believe this guy is sane?
http://www.vox.com/2016/8/9/12415644/donald-trump-second-amendment-joke
Not sure what that has to do with Trump on video calling for one of his wack jobs to shoot Clinton and or her supreme court nominees.Vox is not a credible source. They get articles wrong all the time. They're equivilant to buzz feed.
Do you still think 5# marijuana plants have to be 25 feet tall and 25 feet wide?Vox is not a credible source. They get articles wrong all the time. They're equivilant to buzz feed. They're after clicks and comments not reporting the actual news. They write what ever will get them readers.
They're citing politico which lost all credibility with dnc email leaks. They were allowing the dnc to edit their articles and give the final say.
If you're reading the politico comments it was obviously taken out of context. He never specifically said anything to shoot anyone. He just said there nothing you can do maybe the 2nd amendment people can. That's pretty vague. Considering they're citing politico I wouldn't doubt the dnc wrote that article. They already got caught allowing the dnc to edit and write the articles from the email leaks from wiki leaks.jNot sure what that has to do with Trump on video calling for one of his wack jobs to shoot Clinton and or her supreme court nominees.
yup because the second amendment was written for protesters and lobbyists..If you're reading the politico comments it was obviously taken out of context. He never specifically said anything to shoot anyone. He just said there nothing you can do maybe the 2nd amendment people can. That's pretty vague. Considering they're citing politico I wouldn't doubt the dnc wrote that article. They already got caught allowing the dnc to edit and write the articles from the email leaks from wiki leaks.j
That could mean shoot the judges, that could mean protest, lobby or what ever
No one smart believes he's saneAnybody still believe this guy is sane?
http://www.vox.com/2016/8/9/12415644/donald-trump-second-amendment-joke
If you're reading the politico comments it was obviously taken out of context. He never specifically said anything to shoot anyone. He just said there nothing you can do maybe the 2nd amendment people can. That's pretty vague. Considering they're citing politico I wouldn't doubt the dnc wrote that article. They already got caught allowing the dnc to edit and write the articles from the email leaks from wiki leaks.j
That could mean shoot the judges, that could mean protest, lobby or what ever
Well now you would think all the other countries with common sense gun laws would prove something but nooHillary does not even want to abolish the second amendment, she just calls for common sense gun laws. Maybe its because most of them wouldn't pass the psychological test.
If they set up camp on federal land it would beFor someone claiming to be anti-gun, look how fast you call for fully armed government groups to invade citizens homes.
Bro are you dropping "facts" hyroot style? Most of us call your "facts" imbecile fantasy.If you're reading the politico comments it was obviously taken out of context. He never specifically said anything to shoot anyone. He just said there nothing you can do maybe the 2nd amendment people can. That's pretty vague. Considering they're citing politico I wouldn't doubt the dnc wrote that article. They already got caught allowing the dnc to edit and write the articles from the email leaks from wiki leaks.j
That could mean shoot the judges, that could mean protest, lobby or what ever
That's not what he said and if you watch the video and look at the people to Trumps left they know exactly what he meant. I saw the video first then just threw up one of the first links that came up on a google search.
Sure was.yup because the second amendment was written for protesters
Comprehension aint your thing. The role of federal law enforcement would cover investigating domestic terrorists.For someone claiming to be anti-gun, look how fast you call for fully armed government groups to invade citizens homes.