bluntmassa1
Well-Known Member
Jamaica, Brazil, Mexico....France, united kingdom, Belgium, Germany
Jamaica, Brazil, Mexico....France, united kingdom, Belgium, Germany
You Americans do seem to have a fixation with guns?!?
It's fucking crazy
Whatever your opinion, the inescapable fact is, the greater the availability of guns the more people die at the hands of them.
The gun lobby has lots of money though.
People are so easily brainwashed, controlled.
Haven't you guys kissed and made up yet?Can you quote where I ever said she killed anyone?
Can you quote were I ever said she rigged the election?
You seem butthurt.
Shhhhhhhh! That's why he uses her.sheskunk, does your probation office know you're trolling on a marijuana forum? you should consider asking them.
oh wow.Do you think government should use guns to enforce any gun confiscation laws ?
Would that be an example of people being brainwashed and controlled?
Again, correlation does not equal causation.oh wow.
Thank you, you have genuinely made me think about my position.
Ok, I don't think that is an example of brainwashing (although I may be missing an angle I haven't already considered)
but I do think it challenges my views on armed police.
I will attempt to answer but first, why do people feel the need to own or want guns? I don't understand this, genuinely
I think, unfortunately, it's probably inevitable that those who's job it is to remove guns from society would have to be armed equally as those they are taking them from.
Guns should never have been allowed, made legal, that simple.
As that genie is out of the bag I guess the best way forward is to a) make ownership illegal AFTER a certain date, all firearms to be handed in.
B) compensate ALL those who comply before that date
C) criminalise those who don't comply and then enforce
It might get messy but looking at the murder stats in the USA, shit is already messy.
Ideally, after a time, you could then have a discussion about disarming the cops
Just riffing here.
Feel free to correct me
Sorry. Could you please rephrase that? I am not sure what you are asking me.I understand your view on an intellectual level but how does that sit with
More guns = more gun crime?
They are two different animals. Smoking can cause lung and gum cancer because the smoke comes into contact with those parts. Kind of like water sitting on untreated metal. It will rust eventually.There is a correlation between smoking and cancer but the tobacco industry wouldn't acknowledge a causal link.
The same trick is employed by the gun lobby group
I dispute non of this.They are two different animals. Smoking can cause lung and gum cancer because the smoke comes into contact with those parts. Kind of like water sitting on untreated metal. It will rust eventually.
Crime on the other hand has multiple influences and causes. Since the Jim crow era, politicians and private citizens have been doing their best to hold back the potential of black americans. Red lining, underfunding the schools and police in black neighborhoods, drug laws that permanently strip citizens of their access to aid for school/food/housing, and aggressively targeting black communities has led to them distrusting authority.
So you have large communities with inadequate education, lacking police protection, and the current economy hurts black youth who are looking for jobs.
All of these causes lead to increased crime.
Would those crime have happened without guns? Could someone use a bomb to achieve the same or better results? How about a vehicle or settingI dispute non of this.
Let's take an extreme scenario, given the factors that you mention, if there were zero guns...non at all, how many deaths by gun crime would there be?
Obviously none.
So there you have in play all of the factors that contribute to crime yet no gun crime.
More availability of guns = more gun crime.
The cause of crime will always need addressing but as long as guns are available, gun crime will exist
It depends on the person. For me history plays a large role.Perhaps someone, I did ask earlier, can explain to me the appeal of gun ownership?
oh wow.
Thank you, you have genuinely made me think about my position.
Ok, I don't think that is an example of brainwashing (although I may be missing an angle I haven't already considered)
but I do think it challenges my views on armed police.
I will attempt to answer but first, why do people feel the need to own or want guns? I don't understand this, genuinely
I think, unfortunately, it's probably inevitable that those who's job it is to remove guns from society would have to be armed equally as those they are taking them from.
Guns should never have been allowed, made legal, that simple.
As that genie is out of the bag I guess the best way forward is to a) make ownership illegal AFTER a certain date, all firearms to be handed in.
B) compensate ALL those who comply before that date
C) criminalise those who don't comply and then enforce
It might get messy but looking at the murder stats in the USA, shit is already messy.
Ideally, after a time, you could then have a discussion about disarming the cops
Just riffing here.
Feel free to correct me
I dispute non of this.
Let's take an extreme scenario, given the factors that you mention, if there were zero guns...non at all, how many deaths by gun crime would there be?
Obviously none.
So there you have in play all of the factors that contribute to crime yet no gun crime.
More availability of guns = more gun crime.
The cause of crime will always need addressing but as long as guns are available, gun crime will exist