UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
just close your eyes and pretend that it is mr sunshine working on you.Urgh. I have an ass-fingering scheduled in January. Family prostate thing.
just close your eyes and pretend that it is mr sunshine working on you.Urgh. I have an ass-fingering scheduled in January. Family prostate thing.
Well for instance 77% of rapes in Sweden are comitted by Muslim males, even if they only make out 2% of the population in Sweden.so you are more at risk of being robbed or raped by the 3-5% of the population that is muslim than the 95% or more that is not?
please show me those statistics.
i'm sorry, you don't seem to get the difference between a fair and objective source, and an incredibly retarded and biased one.Well for instance 77% of rapes in Sweden are comitted by Muslim males, even if they only make out 2% of the population in Sweden.
https://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/2015/03/19/sweden-77-6-percent-of-all-rapes-in-the-country-committed-by-muslim-males-making-up-2-percent-of-population/
Also migrants are responsible for 95% of the crime. https://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/2016/08/21/sweden-migrants-responsible-for-95-of-all-crimes-overrepresented-by-430/
Also, more than 60 million Muslims hold favorable opinions of ISIS https://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/2016/06/17/pew-data-more-than-60-million-muslims-hold-favorable-views-of-isis/
Also, I'm not saying my odds of being a victim of a crime is high. But relatively Muslims are the biggest threat to my life. The police fire their weapons like, once a year, tops, in my country. And right wing extremists are a non-issue in my life.
Like, out of the 3 options, Muslims simply are the greatest threat, at least in my country. If it was out of all options, a load of stuff would come before.
power of social media will be gone in USA soon and rights we gave away to NSAI'm not really a conspiracy type guy. I've quoted some stuff after watching Jesse Ventura's show.
I do think that our government is corrupt and will continue that way, only to get worse. There is power in social media. It allows for the fast travel of info.
I think that our rights will be slowly whittled away.
You don't seem to know the difference between a source and a website. Yes the website I found the sources on is biased, and anti-muslim. Doesn't change the facts and statistics of the source. One of the sources being the Swedish police. Are they biased too? Those sources are hosted on plenty of sites, and also published in some newspapers. The medium they're delivered from shouldn't matter when the source is solid.i'm sorry, you don't seem to get the difference between a fair and objective source, and an incredibly retarded and biased one.
horrible sock puppet account. just horrible.power of social media will be gone in USA soon and rights we gave away to NSA
socks are cloth and I'm all about the latexhorrible sock puppet account. just horrible.
Quick, what is currently the color is Rod Blagojevitch's hair?can we get more than 3 options
milky white,with chunksQuick, what is currently the color is Rod Blagojevitch's hair?
you googled it.milky white,with chunks
bama is a kick ass place to party as long as teeth arent important an Im not pickeytoo late. You lose. I think you are from Alabama. First in our hearts - last in everything else.
nope,I blew it on his wiskersyou googled it.
Not true at all. When you cite biased sources, it taints your argument and renders untrustworthy any statistics provided. If they are genuine stats then you should have no problem citing a neutral, respectable source.You don't seem to know the difference between a source and a website. Yes the website I found the sources on is biased, and anti-muslim. Doesn't change the facts and statistics of the source. One of the sources being the Swedish police. Are they biased too? Those sources are hosted on plenty of sites, and also published in some newspapers. The medium they're delivered from shouldn't matter when the source is solid.
TMZSuch as????????
You also don't seem to know the difference between a source and a website. I cited 3 different neutral respectable sources. All taken from 1 biased website. As I said, the sources are reposted on countless websites, I just found them all on one specific website. The website which happens to host the sources shouldn't matter.Not true at all. When you cite biased sources, it taints your argument and renders untrustworthy any statistics provided. If they are genuine stats then you should have no problem citing a neutral, respectable source.
No, your source is the website. If you want your idea to be respected, don't cite anything from a biased website. I do not trust biased websites to correctly represent their own citations.You also don't seem to know the difference between a source and a website. I cited 3 different neutral respectable sources. All taken from 1 biased website. As I said, the sources are reposted on countless websites, I just found them all on one specific website. The website which happens to host the sources shouldn't matter.
No. My source is the source.No, your source is the website. If you want your idea to be respected, don't cite anything from a biased website. I do not trust biased websites to correctly represent their own citations.