Hillary can't be trusted

Status
Not open for further replies.
Flaming Pie

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
rkymtnman said:
i glanced at the article. not one mention of a donation to the foundation that resulted in special services/favors being granted.

would you rather have the clinton foundation trying to help haiti or the trump foundation who bribes attorney generals to dismiss lawsuits against Trump U? actually, dont answer. i already know.
Click to expand...
You cant glance at the article. It is 6 pages long. Many familiar names pop up and it talks about the contracts given by the state dept. You need to look deeper than a glance. Reading and comprehension is required.
 
Flaming Pie

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Pie, you've posted shit too often that actually disproves your assertions. Most often you misquote or misinterpret what is written. Is it because you are too stupid to understand what written or is it because you think nobody is reading that stuff? What point were you trying to make with the link to the Politico article? I'll bet that whatever you think it said is only true between your ears.

Do you really think that the problems in Haiti are Hillary's fault? I mean, we've been fucking with that nation ever since plantation holders in the south feared slave uprisings like the successful one in Haiti.
Click to expand...
Did you actually read all six pages?
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Flaming Pie said:
Did you actually read all six pages?
Click to expand...
scanned them. there wasn't much that was new about it. Care to post something from it that refutes my assertion that it does not show the Clintons as being the root cause of all the issues affecting Haiti today? We've been fucking with that nation since before the civil war. The problems are so complex that I applaud the Clintons for making the attempt.
 
rkymtnman

rkymtnman

Well-Known Member
Flaming Pie said:
You cant glance at the article. It is 6 pages long. Many familiar names pop up and it talks about the contracts given by the state dept. You need to look deeper than a glance. Reading and comprehension is required.
Click to expand...
so i looked at the article. i stopped at the Boeing donation of 900K and did some research. it seems that all the money was spent as it should be for a school to be built and for teacher training. no problem there.

one of her missives was to help US businesses be more succesful overseas and able to compete against others. do you have a problem with her getting boeing a 3.7B contract with the russian government for planes? it's either boeing or airbus (owned by france and other EU countries). boeing got the contract. to thank her for her hard work, they donated money to her non profit. the state dept didn't give out that contract to the russian gov't. it was earned by boeing wth some prodding by hillary

i don't see a problem with that at all.

i have aproblem with 2 AG's from TX and FL instead of doing their job of protecting their citizens, they were bought off by trump and failed to do their jobs.
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
bravedave said:
Tip of the iceberg.
You also need to take your thinking a little deeper than aww shucks its only a few million.
Click to expand...
Don't reply to my posts unless you're going to address the points within.

•The Clinton foundation is a non-profit
•They do demonstrable good work (which even your video confirms)

So what's the fucking problem?

What have YOU done that exceeds the good work done by the Clinton Foundation?

Address these or stfu.
 
bravedave

bravedave

Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja said:
Don't reply to my posts unless you're going to address the points within.

•The Clinton foundation is a non-profit
•They do demonstrable good work (which even your video confirms)

So what's the fucking problem?

What have YOU done that exceeds the good work done by the Clinton Foundation?

Address these or stfu.
Click to expand...
Of course that is just more silliness from you. Do you think that you would have spent the Foundation's money more wisely than them? Do you think utilizing your government position to secure money for your private endeavors is reputable? What would we have to pay you to run their foundation?
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
bravedave said:
Of course that is just more silliness from you. Do you think that you would have spent the Foundation's money more wisely than them? Do you think utilizing your government position to secure money for your private endeavors is reputable? What would we have to pay you to run their foundation?
Click to expand...
It's a non profit not a public entity, so their pay is irrelevant to me.

You realise 10% is actually a pretty good amount compared to alot of supposedly reputable charities?

So, am I also to assume you personally have been responsible for $200mill going to good causes?
 
I

Illinois Enema Bandit

Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja said:
It's a non profit not a public entity, so their pay is irrelevant to me.

You realise 10% is actually a pretty good amount compared to alot of supposedly reputable charities?

So, am I also to assume you personally have been responsible for $200mill going to good causes?
Click to expand...
actually 10% is abysmal,the ASPCA manages to get a whole lot more than that to charity,how hard is it 4 Clinton's 2 take the 2billion they raised 4 hatia,direct from the country's gold mine Clinton's own mineral rights 2 a few miles 2 a bank,then a friggen grocery store,10%is beyond insanity & shows how far we've sunk 2 accept that shit as normal
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top