No guns for medical MJ users

Indacouch

Indacouch

Well-Known Member
Ace Yonder said:
Ah well I don't really disagree with taking people's guns away. They have proven they are not responsible enough to have them over and over and over. I'd be okay with letting people have bolt action rifles and shotguns (For hunting and home defense), but I see no valid reason to allow people to have pistols or assault rifles or anything else that could be quickly fired multiple times or be easily concealed. I think that SOME people are responsible enough to own them, but I think the majority are not and I am willing to make myself and others bear that sacrifice in the name of the greater good.
Click to expand...
Yeah cause a sawed off shotgun can't be concealed and a bolt action didn't assassinate a president ....that makes no sense ....if someone is hell bent on killing people not having a gun isn't guna stop them ..and once all legit guns are taken from law abiding people who deserve to have them ...that will ensure only the crazy fucks you speak of are the only ones who do ....if they don't abide by the law now do you really think another bullshit law will keep guns out of there hands
 
Indacouch

Indacouch

Well-Known Member
Bugeye said:
I say no pointy objects for mj users either. You could poke your fucking eyes out.
Click to expand...
No shit ....lock up the kitchen knives scissors etc etc etc etc etc etc etc ....oh and no going to prison for mmj users either there's to many easily obtainable weapons inside ....I think no potheads in karate classes either and possibly pull drivers license that will fix everything .....
 
dbkick

dbkick

Well-Known Member
e. Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to marijuana or
any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?
This.
 
dbkick

dbkick

Well-Known Member
That does mention "unlawful" though doesn't it?
I suppose you could answer that truthfully if you were written the scripts.
 
Ace Yonder

Ace Yonder

Well-Known Member
Indacouch said:
Yeah cause a sawed off shotgun can't be concealed and a bolt action didn't assassinate a president ....that makes no sense ....if someone is hell bent on killing people not having a gun isn't guna stop them ..and once all legit guns are taken from law abiding people who deserve to have them ...that will ensure only the crazy fucks you speak of are the only ones who do ....if they don't abide by the law now do you really think another bullshit law will keep guns out of there hands
Click to expand...
That argument is so stupid. "If we outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns". Cool. Then we can just arrest or kill anyone with a gun because then we will know they are a crazy fuck outlaw and we don't have to worry about shooting someone who was legally armed. That just makes things easier. Also, you may be able to kill a couple people with a bolt action, but do you really think you could rack up 20, 30, 40 kills before you were stopped if you had a sawed off and a bolt action? Or do you think it might bring the kill count down to around the same level as if you had to use a knife or other non-gun weapon? I don't think anyone's committed a mass killing with a bolt action since Charles Whitman (And even he had at least one Semi-Auto in addition to the bold action)
 
Last edited:
J

joken

Well-Known Member
Ace Yonder said:
Ah well I don't really disagree with taking people's guns away. They have proven they are not responsible enough to have them over and over and over. I'd be okay with letting people have bolt action rifles and shotguns (For hunting and home defense), but I see no valid reason to allow people to have pistols or assault rifles or anything else that could be quickly fired multiple times or be easily concealed. I think that SOME people are responsible enough to own them, but I think the majority are not and I am willing to make myself and others bear that sacrifice in the name of the greater good.
Click to expand...
It's always easy for one man to give another mans freedom away, and that's a slippery slope. History has proven that disarming citizens leads to treachery and that is exactly why we have the 2A.
 
Ace Yonder

Ace Yonder

Well-Known Member
joken said:
It's always easy for one man to give another mans freedom away, and that's a slippery slope. History has proven that disarming citizens leads to treachery and that is exactly why we have the 2A.
Click to expand...
No, internationally history has proven that disarming citizens leads to drastically reduced homicide rates.
 
Ace Yonder

Ace Yonder

Well-Known Member
Illinois Enema Bandit said:
well that's perfect seeing Democratic Vice President & good man Joe Biden is a solid supporter oyf the 2nd amendment,but if it were up to u we'd just kill em all.

Seig Heil mien furher!

I think I saw your YouTube channel,black Hitler !
Click to expand...
Well it seems you only understand hyperbole, so I figured I'd spend a little time speaking your language.
 
I

Illinois Enema Bandit

Well-Known Member
Ace Yonder said:
Ah well I don't really disagree with taking people's guns away. They have proven they are not responsible enough to have them over and over and over. I'd be okay with letting people have bolt action rifles and shotguns (For hunting and home defense), but I see no valid reason to allow people to have pistols or assault rifles or anything else that could be quickly fired multiple times
Click to expand...
you say that now but what about once " those " weapons r gone,what happens once u find out the single shot 444 & 45/70 rifles I own would blow straight through 3 people with a single shot? and my big bore single shot rifles are less powerful than dozens of others,the answer is that you'll also want " just the big bore " rifles next & those r hunting rifles no good 4 combat.

u know government don't stop demonizing something once they start,we all see the lengths those idots have went to keeping the unjust " just say no" war on drugs going & ramping up normal cops into the fukin commando maniacs we have now.
 
Last edited:
I

Illinois Enema Bandit

Well-Known Member
Ace Yonder said:
Well it seems you only understand hyperbole, so I figured I'd spend a little time speaking your language.
Click to expand...
I'm the hype guy,that's rich seeing as I'm the tiny penis Nazi inbred in 99 out of 100 quotes,still waiting on those stats showing the 500 KKK shootings in a city.

only hype I posted was my neck beard :lol:

I actually attempt debate with u people on a quid pro quo basis that never takes place & goes immediately into mud slinging :wall:
 
I

Illinois Enema Bandit

Well-Known Member
joken said:
History starts for some folks when they are born and never looks back. BTW, your information is incorrect, ask an Auzzie.
Click to expand...
sure as shit,violent crime rates soared in aus after the ban,it took months 4 their government 2 even figure out how 2 categorize the massive triple digit increase in home invasions,the aus gov couldn't allow having your door kicked in by armed thugs robbing people being listed as "home invasions";
so they used word play to hide it .

that's not anal rape,its actually " sexually repressed imigrants having difficulty adjusting to their new home":lol:

German chancellor angle merkl tossed that stupidity out there
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top