londonfog
Well-Known Member
Not drinking and driving is a good idea. We enforce laws to insure such.
Not drinking and driving is a good idea. We enforce laws to insure such.
If people weren't restricted from opening local drinking establishments via regulatory impositions, more people could walk to the local brewery and walk home couldn't they ?Not drinking and driving is a good idea. We enforce laws to insure such.
answer in redIf people weren't restricted from opening local drinking establishments via regulatory impositions, more people could walk to the local brewery and walk home couldn't they ? NO. They might want to drive.
Who do you suppose wants to keep government barriers to entry in place in the beer and alcohol markets? Could it be the people that control those markets using their partners in government ? WTF are you saying ?
I bet a free market could solve that problem. In this free market will you have the right to refuse serve based on color of skin ?
answer in red
When you open a place of business that is open to the public, well that means ALL. No one forces you to open a place of business that serves the PUBLIC.A person already has the right to decide who they will interact with or not. Government often uses force to negate that right.
The fact that some people try to deprive others of that right to chose their human interactions on a mutual basis with others is the problem, not the answer.
If somebody else determines your interactions for you...it can't possibly be about freedom or a free market.