What Is Aleppo?

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I think they fucking. Mika tries to be the hard type but when you get in her panties she becomes submissive. They spend so much time together it was inevitable.

So just how much experience do you have wearing ladies panties? Why would she be the submissive, if you were in her panties?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
So just how much experience do you have wearing ladies panties? Why would she be the submissive, if you were in her panties?
I have zero experience wearing panties. When the term "get in her panties" is used, it means to have sex with her.
Does the medication your psychiatrist have you on, interfere with your reading comprehension ? How long are they letting you out your room today ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I have zero experience wearing panties. When the term "get in her panties" is used, it means to have sex with her.
Does the medication your psychiatrist have you on, interfere with your reading comprehension ? How long are they letting you out your room today ?

upload_2016-9-8_10-51-8.png
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Statement from Gary Johnson:

"This morning, I began my day by setting aside any doubt that I’m human. Yes, I understand the dynamics of the Syrian conflict -- I talk about them every day. But hit with “What about Aleppo?”, I immediately was thinking about an acronym, not the Syrian conflict. I blanked. It happens, and it will happen again during the course of this campaign.

Can I name every city in Syria? No. Should I have identified Aleppo? Yes. Do I understand its significance? Yes.

As Governor, there were many things I didn’t know off the top of my head. But I succeeded by surrounding myself with the right people, getting to the bottom of important issues, and making principled decisions. It worked. That is what a President must do.

That would begin, clearly, with daily security briefings that, to me, will be fundamental to the job of being President."

Completely reasonable and commendable for admitting he fucked up

If that were Trump, he'd still be insisting 'Aleppo' doesn't exist
 

rkymtnman

Well-Known Member
Statement from Gary Johnson:

"This morning, I began my day by setting aside any doubt that I’m human. Yes, I understand the dynamics of the Syrian conflict -- I talk about them every day. But hit with “What about Aleppo?”, I immediately was thinking about an acronym, not the Syrian conflict. I blanked. It happens, and it will happen again during the course of this campaign.

Can I name every city in Syria? No. Should I have identified Aleppo? Yes. Do I understand its significance? Yes.

As Governor, there were many things I didn’t know off the top of my head. But I succeeded by surrounding myself with the right people, getting to the bottom of important issues, and making principled decisions. It worked. That is what a President must do.

That would begin, clearly, with daily security briefings that, to me, will be fundamental to the job of being President."

Completely reasonable and commendable for admitting he fucked up

If that were Trump, he'd still be insisting 'Aleppo' doesn't exist
that's admitting he's human. like an ex gov of NM should be.
but trump;s brain is smarter than that. he knows what military generals don;t. lol
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Statement from Gary Johnson:

"This morning, I began my day by setting aside any doubt that I’m human. Yes, I understand the dynamics of the Syrian conflict -- I talk about them every day. But hit with “What about Aleppo?”, I immediately was thinking about an acronym, not the Syrian conflict. I blanked. It happens, and it will happen again during the course of this campaign.

Can I name every city in Syria? No. Should I have identified Aleppo? Yes. Do I understand its significance? Yes.

As Governor, there were many things I didn’t know off the top of my head. But I succeeded by surrounding myself with the right people, getting to the bottom of important issues, and making principled decisions. It worked. That is what a President must do.

That would begin, clearly, with daily security briefings that, to me, will be fundamental to the job of being President."

Completely reasonable and commendable for admitting he fucked up

If that were Trump, he'd still be insisting 'Aleppo' doesn't exist
No, I'm going to say he's out of touch.

You can't pass a newsstand or any news outlet without hearing about.

His campaign crafted a very nice statement.

After all Pada, do you know what Aleppo is?
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
No, I'm going to say he's out of touch.

You can't pass a newsstand or any news outlet without hearing about.

His campaign crafted a very nice statement.

After all Pada, do you know what Aleppo is?
I wonder what's worse, misunderstanding a question or ferverently campaigning for someone and then not voting for them?
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
You know, I felt bad for him. Now I have no love for Gary Johnson, but he just froze like a deer in the headlights. Clearly he has no interest in classical history or he might have realized what was going on.

People hardly ever pay much attention to Gary and consequently he doesn't get a lot of interviews. If you were sitting and talking to the guy he might have even known what Aleppo was, but right at that moment, under the lights, he was not only totally clueless but was a little bit belligerent about it.

Here is a youtube video uploaded by teapartiest. Apparently he or she is more tea partyish than most others.


My point is that it is easy to be lazy and not learn about the rest of the world. If I were running for President I would probably spend some time on foreign affairs though. Unless I were running as a third party. Then why bother?

Libertarians. Great people to hang with and talk about shit - but their ideas on policy are kinda lame.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
You know, I felt bad for him. Now I have no love for Gary Johnson, but he just froze like a deer in the headlights. Clearly he has no interest in classical history or he might have realized what was going on.

People hardly ever pay much attention to Gary and consequently he doesn't get a lot of interviews. If you were sitting and talking to the guy he might have even known what Aleppo was, but right at that moment, under the lights, he was not only totally clueless but was a little bit belligerent about it.

Here is a youtube video uploaded by teapartiest. Apparently he or she is more tea partyish than most others.


My point is that it is easy to be lazy and not learn about the rest of the world. If I were running for President I would probably spend some time on foreign affairs though. Unless I were running as a third party. Then why bother?

Libertarians. Great people to hang with and talk about shit - but their ideas on policy are kinda lame.
Bottom line is, if regular people with regular jobs know what it is, then a presidential hopeful should know, too.

Why do we keep excusing these people?

Stop it!

Johnson and Trump have one thing in common, neither will ever be president.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
And for all those who are freaking out thinking Trump is anywhere near Clinton electorally, he's not.

The truth of the matter is Clinton is ahead and will most linkely win by a landslide but that doesn't sell advertising space nor would you be glued to their channels if 'it were over'..think about it.

Oligarchial media is manufacturing a cliff hanger..and you guys buy it.
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
And for all those who are freaking out thinking Trump is anywhere near Clinton electorally, he's not.

The truth of the matter is Clinton is ahead and will most linkely win by a landslide but that doesn't sell advertising space nor would you be glued to their channels if 'it were over'..think about it.

Oligarchial media is manufacturing a cliff hanger..and you guys buy it.
I don't know about the landslide thing though. The country is pretty polarized right now. I literally think that TRUMP! could 2nd amendment somebody in front of witnesses and still win the region of the country with no good beaches.

I also believe that Clarabell Clown could win those states if the Republican party elected him as their candidate.


he's fucking creepy enough
 
Last edited:

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
I think America is the big winner here. I remember back when most of us didn't know what a Benghazi was let alone how to spell it. I so proud of us am.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
I don't know about the landslide thing though. The country is pretty polarized right now. I literally think that TRUMP! could 2nd amendment somebody in front of witnesses and still win the region of the country with no good beaches.

I also believe that Clarabell Clown could win those states if the Republican party elected him as their candidate.


he's fucking creepy enough
Wanna bet, Baldrick? Avi choice for a month? I say the media is playing with the numbers to create cliffhanger in order to sell advertising..she wins by landslide.

Landslide Definition
There is no legal or constitutional definition of what a landslide election is, or how wide an electoral victory margin must be in order for a candidate to have won in a landslide.

But many modern-day political commentators and media pundits use the term landslide election freely to describe campaigns in which the victor was a clear favorite during the campaign and goes on to win with relative ease.

"It usually means exceeding expectations and being somewhat overwhelming," Gerald Hill, a political scientist and co-author of The Facts on File Dictionary of American Politics, told The Associated Press.

Defining a Landslide
One generally agreed upon measure of a landslide election is when the winning candidate beats his opponent or opponents by at least 15 percentage points in a popular votecount. Under that scenario a landslide would occur when the winning candidate in a two-way election receives 58 percent of the vote, leaving his opponent with 42 percent.

There are variations of the 15-point landslide definition. The online political-news source Politico has defined a landslide election as being on in which the winning candidate beats his opponent by at least 10 percentage points, for example. And the well known political blogger Nate Silver, of The New York Times, has defined a landslide district as being one in which a presidential vote margin deviated by at least 20 percentage points from the national result. Political scientists Hill and Kathleen Thompson Hill and say a landslide occurs when on candidate is able to win 60 percent of the popular vote.

Electoral College Landslide
Of course, the United States does not elect its presidents by popular vote. It instead uses the Electoral College system. There are 538 electoral votes up for grabs in a presidential race, so how many would a candidate have to win to achieve a landslide?

Again, there is no legal or constitutional definition of a landslide in a presidential election. But political journalists have offered their own suggested guidelines for determining a landslide victory over the years. One generally agreed upon definition of an Electoral College landslide is a presidential election in which the winning candidate secures at least 375 or 70 percent of the electoral votes.
 

zeddd

Well-Known Member
"Where hast thou been, sister?"
"Killing Swine"
.....
"A sailor's wife had chestnuts in her lap, and munched and munched and munched. 'Give me' quoth I.
"Aroint thee witch " the rump fed runnian cried. Her husband's to Allepo gone, master o th Tiger
But in a sieve I'll tither sail
And like a rat without a tail, I'll do I'll do and I'll do"

Macbeth seems quite appropriate considering HRC models herself on lady Macbeth
 
Top