Who Will Run for President in 2020?

srh88 · Sep 27, 2016

tangerinegreen555 said:
You're in

its officially announced. im ready for 2020

pabloesqobar · Sep 27, 2016

curious2garden said:
Isn't there a scheduling order somewhere in TX you are supposed to be blowing, oops is that blown?

Opposing counsel picked up the ball he dropped and filed it herself. I don't see anything happening between now and the time his case is dismissed.

Singlemalt · Sep 27, 2016

^^^LOL

Unclebaldrick · Sep 27, 2016

I think instead of 16 Republicans there will be 75. The Republican primaries will be replaced by the format of "so you think you can dance".

Singlemalt · Sep 27, 2016

Unclebaldrick said:
I think instead of 16 Republicans there will be 75. The Republican primaries will be replaced by the format of "so you think you can dance".

LOL!!! Con permiso: at the start of the Pres. campaign season, the RNC takes out newspaper and magazine ads, CraigsList too announcing a DANCE OFF at the old "Soul Train" studio, top 10 get to run

neosapien · Sep 27, 2016

They moved this thread to politics. The place where threads go to DIE DIE DIE!

srh88 · Sep 27, 2016

neosapien said:
They moved this thread to politics. The place where threads go to DIE DIE DIE!

No way.. politics is hilarious. There's everything from white power retards to people who support pedophilia in here.. its the trolling version of fishing with dynamite

Justin-case · Sep 27, 2016

Finshaggy · Sep 28, 2016

Singlemalt said:
Epiphany!!! ; this explains your police movie thread; trying to share violence tips to include in your lust for bloody revolution. Good show Fin, I always thought you were vegan.

Lol.
The movie is based on the Black P. Stones.

A Revolution has to have bloodshed but that doesn't mean anything has to be blown up or a lot of people, or anyone really, has to die. The Revolution in the 60s included bloodshed, but usually it was the Revolutionaries bleeding as the Police beat the shit out of them. A few cops did die, but that was due to White Police going in to Black Neighborhoods and harassing the people. Hence the Black Panthers. A lot of people think the Black Panthers were "lashing out" against segregation by carrying guns, but it was actually a movement to Police their own neighborhoods.

Watch this:

Then once the FBI and Chicago DA assassinated Fred Hampton it really kicked things off. And yes, all of that was part of the Revolution, but its not like they just randomly went around killing people because it was a Revolution. It was direct responses to actions taken by the Government.

The movie I am writing is more inspired by Paris and Brussels, where people were making bombs, as well as the Black P. Stones, which was just violence over turf, etc. The movie has nothing to do with anything real.

And it's not like I am planning a Revolution. I am just saying I would like to see Bernie's "Revolution" become a real Revolution. I'm not planning anything other than a movie.

Finshaggy · Sep 28, 2016

curious2garden said:
Isn't there a scheduling order somewhere in TX you are supposed to be blowing, oops is that blown?

I already did that. How do you even know about that? Are you following me on Twitter? I thought the only place I posted that was to the Police Department I am suing.

Finshaggy · Sep 28, 2016

tangerinegreen555 said:
Actually, I was thinking of making a run.

We had the 1st black guy last time, it's quite probable we'll have the 1st girl this time...the next logical question might just be...

Are the American people ready to support a dog? I say yes.

I will cut ALL pet taxes and license fees. I will build a wall around kill kennels. I also support cats, fish and non poisonous snakes.

I would support deer and cattle...but we have to eat, so...

Vote for me next time.

Ask not what your dog can do for you...
Ask what you can do for your dog.

this is tangerinegreen and I approve this message.

You can be like Vermin Supreme, lol

Finshaggy · Sep 28, 2016

pabloesqobar said:
Opposing counsel picked up the ball he dropped and filed it herself. I don't see anything happening between now and the time his case is dismissed.

Why do you think you know anything about my case?
First off, their "strategy" was to wait for the Scheduling Order Deadline and hope it would just be dismissed then, so if somehow you know something I don't know and they filed it, then that is actually against their own strategy. And I told them to file, so that's not a "dropped ball", if they filed then they did exactly what I told them to do.

And secondly,
Their whole argument is that they can't be sued, and that they are immune from this lawsuit. But if you read Texas Code Title 5 Chapter 110, definition of "Government", they definitely can be sued. So they have a whole defense to create now (they are the defendants).

And they asked for it to be removed to Federal Court, and it was rejected because they forgot to file a Scheduling Order first.

So, I don't think you somehow know what you are claiming to know, but even if you do somehow know things about them filing, then they are working against themselves.

Finshaggy · Sep 28, 2016

Ok, I just checked my email and they want to set up a Conference call with the court about this today. Why do you know things about my case? Are you like paying attention to it on the public records? That is really weird.

Vnsmkr · Sep 28, 2016

fuck and fuckwit. wait they are "running" now. so yeah, another fuck and fuckwit

Finshaggy · Sep 28, 2016

Here is (part of) my arguments for anyone interested. And their argument is that they are immune.

My Religion they Violated

Here is a PubMed research paper about it
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22742944

And here is the Holiday (my right to celebrate) I was deprived of when they took my plants, seeds, and powders.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holi

TexasCode
Title 5 Governmental liability
Chapter 110 Religious Freedom
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/CP/htm/CP.110.htm

USC

Title 18 Section 242 of the USC

42 U.S. Code § 2000cc–5 - Definitions
(3) Free Exercise Clause

The term “Free Exercise Clause” means that portion of the first amendment to the Constitution that proscribes laws prohibiting the free exercise of religion.

(4) GovernmentThe term “government”—
(A) means—
(i)
a State, county, municipality, or other governmental entity created under the authority of a State;
(ii)
any branch, department, agency, instrumentality, or official of an entity listed in clause (i); and
(iii)
any other person acting under color of State law; and

42 U.S. Code § 2000cc–3 - Rules of construction
(b) Religious exercise not regulated

Nothing in this chapter shall create any basis for restricting or burdening religious exercise or for claims against a religious organization including any religiously affiliated school or university, not acting under color of law.

42 U.S. Code § 2000cc–5 - Definitions

(3) Free Exercise Clause

The term “Free Exercise Clause” means that portion of the first amendment to the Constitution that proscribes laws prohibiting the free exercise of religion.

(4) GovernmentThe term “government”—
(A) means—
(i)
a State, county, municipality, or other governmental entity created under the authority of a State;
(ii)
any branch, department, agency, instrumentality, or official of an entity listed in clause (i); and
(iii)
any other person acting under color of State law; and
(B)
for the purposes of sections 2000cc–2(b) and 2000cc–3 of this title, includes the United States, a branch, department, agency, instrumentality, or official of the United States, and any other person acting under color of Federal law.

(7) Religious exercise
(A) In general
The term “religious exercise” includes any exercise of religion, whether or not compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief.

42 U.S. Code § 2000cc–3 - Rules of construction

(g) Broad construction
This chapter shall be construed in favor of a broad protection of religious exercise, to the maximum extent permitted by the terms of this chapter and the Constitution.

We find no constitutional requirement which makes it necessary for government to be hostile to religion and throw its weight against efforts to widen the effective scope of religious influence Zorach V Clauson, 343 US 306, 313 314 (1952)

Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709 (2005)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/544/03-9877/index.pdf

Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/508/520/case.html

Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal546 U.S. 418 (2006)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/546/04-1084/index.pdf

Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States143 U.S. 457 (1892)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/143/457/case.html

Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, 573 U.S. ___ (2014)
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-354_olp1.pdf

Sherbert v. Verner374 U.S. 398 (1963)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/374/398/case.html

Thomas v. Review Bd., Ind. Empl. Sec. Div.450 U.S. 707 (1981)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/450/707/case.html

Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/403/388/case.html

Soldal v. Cook County, 506 U.S. 56 (1992)

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/506/56/

Florida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. 1 (2013)

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/569/11-564/

Finshaggy · Sep 28, 2016

(a little more of my case)

the Clauses of the Basic Rights being violated

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Free Exercise Clause (US Constitution, 1st Amendment)
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

Freedom of Worship Clause (Texas Constitution, Article 1 Section 6)
Sec. 6. FREEDOM OF WORSHIP.
"All men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences. No man shall be compelled to attend, erect or support any place of worship, or to maintain any ministry against his consent. No human authority ought, in any case whatever, to control or interfere with the rights of conscience in matters of religion, and no preference shall ever be given by law to any religious society or mode of worship. But it shall be the duty of the Legislature to pass such laws as may be necessary to protect equally every religious denomination in the peaceable enjoyment of its own mode of public worship."

18 U.S. Code § 247 - Damage to religious property; obstruction of persons in the free exercise of religious beliefs
(a) Whoever, in any of the circumstances referred to in subsection (b) of this section—
(1)
intentionally defaces, damages, or destroys any religious real property, because of the religious character of that property, or attempts to do so; or
(2)
intentionally obstructs, by force or threat of force, any person in the enjoyment of that person’s free exercise of religious beliefs, or attempts to do so;

Finshaggy · Sep 28, 2016

Unclebaldrick · Sep 28, 2016

Justin-case said:
View attachment 3791533

Good idea. I think I will pass the time by playing a little solitaire.

Finshaggy · Sep 28, 2016

And since they illegally searched my car, here is Jones V US
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/565/10-1259/

I also have emails from a Narcotics Conspiracy Sergeant, proving that everything they did was proven to be pointless in the end, because nothing they took from me was illegal.

So they may think they are in the right, and that they can't be sued. But they violated a Religion, and whether they understand that or not is not important, but by the end of this they will understand a little better.

Unclebaldrick · Sep 28, 2016

Focus Fin. We don't do that here in politics. All the threads here are tightly focused laser beams.

Lol

Who Will Run for President in 2020?

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member