Hillary can't be trusted

[Fogdog]

“When you give, they do whatever the hell you want them to do. ... two years later, three years later, I call them, and they are there for me.

 

[testiclees]

Wow i wonder what he might say. maybe we need a thread to help trump with wording for his date with reality.

 

[Fogdog]

Wow i wonder what he might say. maybe we need a thread to help trump with wording for his date with reality.

While I like to poke at the Trump faithful, I can't fathom him ever giving a concession speech. It's my guess that he's going to sue the entire US electorate for making him look foolish.

Still, your question has lots of room for comedic fan fiction. I like it.

 

[testiclees]

While I like to poke at the Trump faithful, I can't fathom him ever giving a concession speech. It's my guess that he's going to sue the entire US electorate for making him look foolish.

I bet he'll try to do something that he believes is financially tactical. Something that leads to loons supporting him with slavish devotion and $$.

 

[Fogdog]

I bet he'll try to do something that he believes is financially tactical. Something that leads to loons supporting him with slavish devotion and $$.

Trump TV, a video format of Breitbart, is the theory du jour. Makes me glad I don't own a TV.

 

[Big_Lou]

LOL!

 

[spandy]

 

[Rizlared]

LOL

I thought so. Weak minded tend to go for conspiracy theories. "It was an inside job" and this election is rigged. LOL

As far as gravity goes, the Theory of Relativity shows there is no such thing as "gravitational force". Also is better at modeling the behavior of matter and light than Newton's. You don't know much, do you?

Trump's concession speech in 24 days is going to be yuuuuuuge

I beg to differ!

Over here, for 25 years, families of the bereaved at Hillsborough fought for justice.

They, and their supporters, were labeled conspiracy theorists by people like you who accept the view of the establishment.

25 years later the PM stands in parliament and apologised for, what was, a state cover up.

A cover up that involved the government, the police, the media, the ambulance service and the legal system.

The people that fought for Justice, and won, are anything BUT weak minded!

....and yet still, people like you want to dismiss ALL 'conspiracies' as though they are all of equal merit.

Ridiculous

 

[testiclees]

@Rizlared

Cringe inducing ass

 

[testiclees]

Next President of the United States of America
Odds as of October 13 at Bovada

• Hillary Clinton -650
• Donald Trump +400

HRC

85.7%

Donald Trump

14.3%

 

[Big_Lou]

 

[Illinois Enema Bandit]

LOL

I thought so. Weak minded tend to go for conspiracy theories.

.
.yup its all conspiracy theories,meanwhile rollitup pumps out a dozen anti trump threads a week,with topics ranging from sexual accusations to bankruptcy,I created a thread exposing bill Clinton's serial rape issue & it was taken down within minutes

we can post all the anti trump shit we want but come up craps showing what MSM hides,like this sweet nugget of protestors at Hillary rally's asking Hillary about her serial rapist husband & why she attacks his rape victims .
enjoy !

 

[Big_Lou]

WORK it to your DADDY, bitches!

 

[Big_Lou]

.
.yup its all conspiracy theories,meanwhile rollitup pumps out a dozen anti trump threads a week,with topics ranging from sexual accusations to bankruptcy,I created a thread exposing bill Clinton's serial rape issue & it was taken down within minutes

we can post all the anti trump shit we want but come up craps showing what MSM hides,like this sweet nugget of protestors at Hillary rally's asking Hillary about her serial rapist husband & why she attacks his rape victims .
enjoy !

THIRD time (today!) posting this video depicting paid Drumpf nazis interrupting an adept orator, tsk tsk tsk.....how BADLY do you want Hil to piss in your face while you toss Donnie's salad, eh? Melting down by the second, old fella!

You wretched, nearly unbelievable creature, lol....

 

[Fogdog]

I beg to differ!

Over here, for 25 years, families of the bereaved at Hillsborough fought for justice.

They, and their supporters, were labeled conspiracy theorists by people like you who accept the view of the establishment.

25 years later the PM stands in parliament and apologised for, what was, a state cover up.

A cover up that involved the government, the police, the media, the ambulance service and the legal system.

The people that fought for Justice, and won, are anything BUT weak minded!

....and yet still, people like you want to dismiss ALL 'conspiracies' as though they are all of equal merit.

Ridiculous

Your exception proves the rule. A hallmark attribute of the list I posted is that the purported reason for the conspiracy is overwrought or inexplicable. Like the one about faking the moon landing or 9-11.

You talk as though "Hillsborough" is common knowledge. I don't know anything about that case but I'd be willing to bet that the "cover up" had nothing to do with nefarious top secret plot to deceive the world (as in fake moon landing) or whatever the international skullduggery was behind placing charges in the Twin Towers that killed 4,000 people. It was certainly not a historic event.

The term "conspiracy plots or theories" has come to refer to fringe theories which explains a historical or current event as the result of a secret plot by conspirators of almost superhuman power and cunning. They also use pseudo-logic, starting with a claim then finding reasons or so-called evidence to back them up rather than the other way around. They often use circular arguments like you do.

As in the old joke, "If Ben Johnson didn't write the works of Shakespeare, then who did?"

Real conspiracies are most often homed in large corporations that cover up mistakes that would cost the companies huge sums of money. The lie about tobacco not causing cancer is one of those. Another is Anthropogenic Global Warming denial, which isn't so much a secret but it is a conspiracy. Or Dupont poisoning the wells of Parkersburg VA. Governments do the same, witness some terrible lies used to cover up failures in the Veteran's Hospitals. The difference is that the motivation behind a real conspiracy is usually banal, such as money or an administrator's fear for their job. Also, real evidence is available to make the claim of conspiracy true. They are perpetrated by normal humans who make mistakes both by commission and omission. And finally there is no way to cast a conspiracy with thousands of participants.

In any case, I laugh at 911 as a conspiracy inside job because the reasoning given is demonstrably false and ignores facts. Same is true for the "moon landing was fake". I laugh not because I'm reinforcing history but because anybody with a strong telescope can see the evidence on the moon for themselves. I laugh because chumps like @Illinois Enema Bandit start with a premise and stick to it regardless of facts.

 

[Fogdog]

.
.yup its all conspiracy theories,meanwhile rollitup pumps out a dozen anti trump threads a week,with topics ranging from sexual accusations to bankruptcy,I created a thread exposing bill Clinton's serial rape issue & it was taken down within minutes

we can post all the anti trump shit we want but come up craps showing what MSM hides,like this sweet nugget of protestors at Hillary rally's asking Hillary about her serial rapist husband & why she attacks his rape victims .
enjoy !

The difference between allegations against Trump and allegations of rape against Bill Clinton is that allegations against Trump can be substantiated. Allegations against Bill cannot and in most cases are proven false. The two are not equal and do not deserve equal consideration.

 

[Illinois Enema Bandit]

I beg to differ!

Over here, for 25 years, families of the bereaved at Hillsborough fought for justice.

They, and their supporters, were labeled conspiracy theorists by people like you who accept the view of the establishment.

25 years later the PM stands in parliament and apologised for, what was, a state cover up.

A cover up that involved the government, the police, the media, the ambulance service and the legal system.

The people that fought for Justice, and won, are anything BUT weak minded!

....and yet still, people like you want to dismiss ALL 'conspiracies' as though they are all of equal merit.

Ridiculous

what they hide from & fail to address is how weal they are alone & speaking only in fact,

Your exception proves the rule. A hallmark attribute of the list I put together is that the purported reason for the conspiracy is overwrought or inexplicable. Like the one about faking the moon landing or 9-11.

You talk as though "Hillsborough" is common knowledge. I don't know anything about that case but I'd be willing to bet that the "cover up" had nothing to do with nefarious top secret plot to deceive the world (as in fake moon landing) or whatever the international skullduggery was behind placing charges in the Twin Towers that killed 4,000 people. It was certainly not a historic event.

The term "conspiracy plots or theories" has come to refer to fringe theories which explains a historical or current event as the result of a secret plot by conspirators of almost superhuman power and cunning. They also use pseudo-logic, starting with a claim then finding reasons or so-called evidence to back them up rather than the other way around. They often use circular arguments like you do.

As in the old joke, "If Ben Johnson didn't write the works of Shakespeare, then who did?"

Real conspiracies are most often homed in large corporations that cover up mistakes that would cost the companies huge sums of money. The lie about tobacco not causing cancer is one of those. Another is Anthropogenic Global Warming denial, which isn't so much a secret but it is a conspiracy. Or Dupont poisoning the wells of Parkersburg VA. Governments do the same, witness some terrible lies used to cover up failures in the Veteran's Hospitals. The difference is that the motivation behind a real conspiracy is usually banal, such as money or an administrator's fear for their job. Also, real evidence is available to make the claim of conspiracy true. They are perpetrated by normal humans who make mistakes both by commission and omission. And finally there is no way to cast a conspiracy with thousands of participants.

In any case, I laugh at 911 as a conspiracy inside job because the reasoning given is demonstrably false and ignores facts. Same is true for the "moon landing was fake". I laugh not because I'm reinforcing history but because anybody with a strong telescope can see the evidence on the moon for themselves. I laugh because chumps like @Illinois Enema Bandit start with a premise and stick to it regardless of facts.

Not an historic event ?

where the hell have u been hiding at,oh I forgot if its not on MSNBC it wasn't a major event

 

[Fogdog]

what they hide from & fail to address is how weal they are alone & speaking only in fact,



Not an historic event ?

where the hell have u been hiding at,oh I forgot if its not on MSNBC it wasn't a major event

I admit that I don't know what Hillsborough is and don't really feel like looking it up. If you want to, you may use my words and have fun with them. So, go ahead, I'm listening. Can you manage to say something that sticks to facts for more than a few sentences?

 

[Rizlared]

Your exception proves the rule. A hallmark attribute of the list I put together is that the purported reason for the conspiracy is overwrought or inexplicable. Like the one about faking the moon landing or 9-11.

You talk as though "Hillsborough" is common knowledge. I don't know anything about that case but I'd be willing to bet that the "cover up" had nothing to do with nefarious top secret plot to deceive the world (as in fake moon landing) or whatever the international skullduggery was behind placing charges in the Twin Towers that killed 4,000 people. It was certainly not a historic event.

The term "conspiracy plots or theories" has come to refer to fringe theories which explains a historical or current event as the result of a secret plot by conspirators of almost superhuman power and cunning. They also use pseudo-logic, starting with a claim then finding reasons or so-called evidence to back them up rather than the other way around. They often use circular arguments like you do.

As in the old joke, "If Ben Johnson didn't write the works of Shakespeare, then who did?"

Real conspiracies are most often homed in large corporations that cover up mistakes that would cost the companies huge sums of money. The lie about tobacco not causing cancer is one of those. Another is Anthropogenic Global Warming denial, which isn't so much a secret but it is a conspiracy. Or Dupont poisoning the wells of Parkersburg VA. Governments do the same, witness some terrible lies used to cover up failures in the Veteran's Hospitals. The difference is that the motivation behind a real conspiracy is usually banal, such as money or an administrator's fear for their job. Also, real evidence is available to make the claim of conspiracy true. They are perpetrated by normal humans who make mistakes both by commission and omission. And finally there is no way to cast a conspiracy with thousands of participants.

In any case, I laugh at 911 as a conspiracy inside job because the reasoning given is demonstrably false and ignores facts. Same is true for the "moon landing was fake". I laugh not because I'm reinforcing history but because anybody with a strong telescope can see the evidence on the moon for themselves. I laugh because chumps like @Illinois Enema Bandit start with a premise and stick to it regardless of facts.

'Conspiracies' have nothing to do with people of almost superhuman power.

The definition of conspiracy is two or more people meeting in private to do something illegal or bad.

Now, to suggest that the above doesn't happen would indeed be naive.

Google Hillsborough, you'll find the government lied and blamed the victims for the tragedy.

The point I was trying to make is...how can anyone dismiss all 'conspiracies' as being the same?

That is ridiculous.

Now I believe man landed on the moon

I believe the world is round

I view every conspiracy on its individual merits, I balance the facts and form an unbiased opinion based on those facts....and based on FACTS you'd have to be severely naive to believe the 9/11 commission report.

If you can be arsed, which I'm sure you can't, you tube war by deception.

Watch what decent investigative journalism can do and try and make the 9/11 commission report fit those facts.

They do not.

 

[Illinois Enema Bandit]

The difference between allegations against Trump and allegations of rape against Bill Clinton is that allegations against Trump can be substantiated. Allegations against Bill cannot and in most cases are proven false. The two are not equal and do not deserve equal consideration.

That's a flat out lie & funny as hell.

Bill Clinton was permenantly expelled from Yale for raping a female student,100% poven fact

Bill Clinton took sexual advantage of Whitehouse interns,100% proven fact

Bill Clinton paid out nearly $1 million dollars to one of his rape victims,100% proven fact

Bill Clinton lost his license to practice law for perguring himself & lying under oath,100% proven fact

Bill Clinton is a sexual pervert that gets off stuffing the cigars he smokes up young girls pussy's,100% proven fact

Bill Clinton used the presidential offices to take sexual advantage of interns & shoot loads of jizz on at least 1 interns dress,again 100% proven historical fact

Bill Clinton's rape victims who've never met each other claim Hillary Clinton stalked & or threatened them over the course of 30 years,one victim who couldn't be bullied committed suicide on her birthday " assassinated" ,again 100% proven recorded facts

Bill Clinton is a proven serial predator who has been raping women since 1969,so much for your " demonstrably false" claims