Eric Holder occupied a government building. He seems to have done OK for himself.Every word of what you say may, in fact, be true. Being a black man though, that type of thinking could almost assuredly get me killed or imprisoned. Being white, however, seems to allow you to think this way and even call those thoughts to action. Some people will even label you as "patriots". What do you think they'd label my crew if we pulled the exact same stunt? "Thug" is the nicest moniker that comes to mind, while on the other (and more realistic) end of the spectrum they'd call us "dead".
how does it feel knowing youve been wrong literally every step of the way on this?White privilege is what kept Hillary from being charged. So far.
Really? Well that changes EVERYTHING.Eric Holder occupied a government building. He seems to have done OK for himself.
Please allow me to be the first to laugh at the coon.Oooooops!
Oops! Trump Mistook a Black Supporter at His Rally for a Protester and Called Him a “Thug”
http://rebrn.com/re/oops-trump-mistook-a-black-supporter-at-his-rally-for-a-proteste-2924293/
____________________________
ADAM EDELMAN
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Sunday, February 28, 2016, 5:54 PM
Racism reportedly runs in the family, when it comes to the Trump Klan.
Trump’s late father, Fred Trump, was arrested following a Ku Klux Klan riot in Queens in 1927, according to a bombshell report that further suggests unusual ties between the 2016 front-runner and the notorious white supremacist group.
Fred Trump Sr. was among seven men arrested following a May 30, 1927 brawl between members of the KKK and the New York Police Department, according to The Washington Post, which unearthed news articles from the June 1, 1927 edition of The New York Times.
No"Plan Parenthood"? "Guise"? "Christians praying out front"?
Please do the right thing and leave the site.
how are your klan rallies and shitty crops going lately, microdick?lmao
No. It's been white rigging.White privilege is what kept Hillary from being charged. So far.
yes you do, you have denied for years that the type of racial segregation you favor, which existed before civil rights laws (which you call "slavery" and "rape" and "offensive"), did not harm black people at all.
well isn't that just the most adorable euphemism there ever was for racial segregation and denial of service to black people.I favor voluntary human interactions based on mutual consent.
you just said that you "don't dispute that there has been systemic racism and black people have been and often still are victimized by it".How does a person create an actionable harm to somebody else if they don't associate with that person?
uhh, yeah, I can see how this might look a little odd.
didn't read it. Why do the the Washington Times use the word "some" in their headline yet you say "The Natives" -- as in all of them?Another perspective on the North Dakota pipeline. The Natives who live there want the Kulaks and wreckers who don't live there to leave.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/30/some-standing-rock-sioux-want-pipeline-activists-t/