White Nationalist Warns of Multicultural Bloodbath if Trump Loses

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
That little girl who is now 35 years old has dropped her lawsuit.... Wonder why....

Oh wait, I dont wonder why.... She was paid by the Clintons to bring the suit in the first place. She couldnt have testified under oath without risking another illegal act being outed...
Click to expand...
delusional conspiracy theory.

i bet she refiles after trump loses.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
How can you possibly deduce that from what I posted?

I did a home inspection for a black woman yesterday. She was very pretty, I would have hit it :} Nice too!! Skin color doesnt matter.

Maybe if you didnt spend all day thinking about it you would be happier.
Click to expand...
Then why didn't you just say..'I met a nice lady yesterday'..if color doesn't matter to you?
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
Then why didn't you just say..'I met a nice lady yesterday'..if color doesn't matter to you?
Click to expand...
Color matters to me. I'd have likely said something similar, IF the comment was about culture or ethnic background or country of familial origin, etc.

Yes, because colors DO matter; I'm interested in people's stories and people of color are probably not from my town (cuz it's overwhelmingly white) and therefore are likely to have interesting stories to tell.

Color matters because we need the perspective they bring. Color matters because we all need to work together, and we need everyone to bring their strengths.

I used to think color blindness was a good approach but I've come to realize that it's a very self limiting attitude, as it glosses over the differences that make each of us unique, special and valuable.

Vive la difference!
 
A.K.A. Overgrowem

A.K.A. Overgrowem

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
delusional conspiracy theory.

i bet she refiles after trump loses.
Click to expand...
Is that woman, 3rd up (4th row) on the left, wearing a fur coat? I remember, she was at the police station in Coggan's Bluff. Looking back, I realize, she would be a stereotypical Trump supporter.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Those who would commit violence when an election doesn't go their way are especially dangerous to a free society, almost as much as those who encourage them to do it.
Click to expand...
Edit: switched back for the sake of inclusiveness.

Agree wholeheartedly. About a week ago, I was testing the real patriotism of some of our repetitive wing nut posters by saying that I'd peacefully accept Trump's presidency if he won and asked if they would do the same if Clinton won. Not a single wing nut was willing to agree. @choomer even accused me tearing down important patriotic ideals of this country because I came out against the idea of armed insurrection. @choomer seemed to think that if one loses an election, an armed revolt is a patriotic act. Completely forgetting the US ideal of peaceful transfer of power after an election.
 
Last edited:
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
minor change ^^.

Agree wholeheartedly. About a week ago, I was testing the real patriotism of some of our repetitive wing nut posters by saying that I'd peacefully accept Trump's presidency if he won and asked if they would do the same if Clinton won. Not a single wing nut was willing to agree. @choomer even accused me tearing down important patriotic ideals of this country because I came out against the idea of armed insurrection. @choomer seemed to think that armed revolt if one loses an election is a patriotic act. Completely forgetting the other US ideal of peaceful transfer of power after an election.
Click to expand...
@choomer is a pussy.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
minor change ^^.

Agree wholeheartedly. About a week ago, I was testing the real patriotism of some of our repetitive wing nut posters by saying that I'd peacefully accept Trump's presidency if he won and asked if they would do the same if Clinton won. Not a single wing nut was willing to agree. @choomer even accused me tearing down important patriotic ideals of this country because I came out against the idea of armed insurrection. @choomer seemed to think that if one loses an election, an armed revolt is a patriotic act. Completely forgetting the other US ideal of peaceful transfer of power after an election.
Click to expand...
Change it back for inclusiveness; there are no leaders in a mob but they act on it anyway. Whether they call themselves leaders or 'just voices in the crowd', their words have consequences and they must be held accountable.

EDIT: Thank you, because we all should be held accountable for the consequences of our actions. I certainly expect to be.
 
Last edited:
choomer

choomer

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
@choomer is a pussy.
Click to expand...
ttystikk said:
@choomer is a bitch waiting for the Chump to move on him.
Click to expand...
Nothing like but-buddies reinforcing each others false beliefs.
I hope you both enjoyed the mutual choad chomping!

It doesn't change the fact that you're both so totally vested in a career criminal.
As if anyone thought Comey would endanger himself and his family by doing his job.

May both of you choke on the smegma. :D
 
choomer

choomer

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
minor change ^^.

Agree wholeheartedly. About a week ago, I was testing the real patriotism of some of our repetitive wing nut posters by saying that I'd peacefully accept Trump's presidency if he won and asked if they would do the same if Clinton won. Not a single wing nut was willing to agree. @choomer even accused me tearing down important patriotic ideals of this country because I came out against the idea of armed insurrection. @choomer seemed to think that if one loses an election, an armed revolt is a patriotic act. Completely forgetting the other US ideal of peaceful transfer of power after an election.
Click to expand...
You forget the founding principles of this country.
A criminal gov't is criminal. You seem to think it's an unsalable thing to call out criminality of an "institution".

"Institutions" are what you get committed to w/ no chance of escape.

I didn't know it was a 3-way honking you folks were in to.
Enjoy!
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
choomer said:
You forget the founding principles of this country.
A criminal gov't is criminal. You seem to think it's an unsalable thing to call out criminality of an "institution".

"Institutions" are what you get committed to w/ no chance of escape.

I didn't know it was a 3-way honking you folks were in to.
Enjoy!
Click to expand...
Why do you plan to bomb the capital when Hillary becomes president?
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
k
Click to expand...
My point here is that anyone who advocates violence against one another or our democratic system, 'leader' or not, because they didn't win the election or get their way is committing a crime against the social compact we have all pledged to uphold. If we don't treat it as such we are holding the door open for totalitarianism.

Leaders, sure, but ANYONE who thinks this is acceptable behavior and encourages others to act this way, let alone aids them or commits the acts themselves.

Sorry if this sounds legalistic but I feel it's important to clearly define the boundaries between discourse and discussion- and insurrection.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top