Al B. Fuct
once had a dog named
Problem is that cannabis plants have certain lighting requirements. LEDs don't make enough light to cause the plant to grow properly. We already know what will happen. It's hardly novel nor much of an experiment to give a plant insufficient light. You could just as validly 'experiment' with glyphosate as a fertiliser. It'd surely be new, but would it be 'cool' or 'stupid'? Most people don't have to jump off a cliff to prove they can't fly.I think the spirit of experimentation is a good thing. Regardless of our opinions, watching someone do something new is cool.
LEDs sold for growing plants is nothing short of theft. LEDs sold as a SUPERIOR light source for growing plants is theft by deception.
No one likes to admit they've been suckered. The response of people who have bought LEDs & Aerogardens (and amazingly in this case, BOTH) for growing cannabis is usually first that they think they've found the holy grail and are under obligation to educate the stodgy curmudgeons who obviously have overlooked such manna. It doesn't usually take long for phase two- disappointment that the old farts were actually right. One would hope that the lesson would be learned with some grace, but some suckers have to lash out at everyone else over their own susceptibility to suggestion.