Nevergood's high power garden

nevergoodenuf

Well-Known Member
The 4 Sherbet that are in 420 soil took in the clones the fastest. They are going to be eating Mission organic soil again, but I expect better result. The last plant were 5' tall and I was still under 25 watts per square feet. The sample bag of Coco Loco was the big surprise. I usually use ready-gro moisturemax, but that are looking no where near as good as the Cherry Pies in the Coco Loco.
It has been a few grows since I have ran plants this short in flower, so I am interested how the quicker flip will be at 20-25 watts per square foot. The larger half of the Coco run will be drain to waste and the 4'x2' tray will be flood and drain for the same res. using House and Gardens Coco A & B. Since I top dressed the Coco pots and stripped off all the lowers, I will veg another couple day. IMG_20170304_200113068.jpg IMG_20170304_200120013_HDR.jpg
 

nevergoodenuf

Well-Known Member
Got new toys in transit. my gen 6's (3000K 90cri) and HLG480's I will get before the weekend. Tomorrow will be the first day of Flower.
Talk about ultimate efficiency, 600w COBs running @ 75w each (10) for 21 watts per square. This will be the last run with the Luna 300's, unless they surprise me this time. These are all the Cherry Pies in Coco. I now have the res set up so the 2'x4' tray is flood & drain and the 2'x8' tray is top feed.
IMG_20170306_200654814_HDR.jpg IMG_20170306_200627008_HDR.jpg IMG_20170306_200641060.jpg
 

nevergoodenuf

Well-Known Member
IMG_20170312_170316750.jpg IMG_20170312_170842139_HDR.jpg IMG_20170312_170852231_HDR.jpg I had a feeling I couldn't get 1000w. I think the newer CLU058's are drawing less voltage, so less power. Either way I am pull 950w at the wall and a couple watts more when the fans are plugged in. I still haven't figured out how to upload the FLIR pics (not even to my computer), but I didn't see over 90* @ 237w.
At 30", I have a 140,000+ lux over a 40"x 12"+ area without any reflectors yet.
At 20", I have 200,000 lux over a similar area.
 

nevergoodenuf

Well-Known Member
Back to my room. The 4 Sherbert are completely filling out the 3.5'x4.5' (wall to wall is 4'x5') and might make it wall to wall. Since I already have a low (20w per square foot) area. I decided to have the other half at double the watts per square foot. Now over the 4 Sherbert is-
4 600w HS with 2 warped CLU058 3618's per heat sink ( the COB's I ran with the graphite pads)
2 HLG320H-C2800B And YES I am running 4 COBs in parallel on a CC driver.
Full warmed up, with my thermal camera, the hottest spot was under 45*c. The watt meter has me pulling a total of 620 watts over the 2 fixtures. If anyone has excel that can type in the #'s for lumen per watt and efficacy %, then key in CLU058 3618 3500k 80cri gen5 with a Tc of 45*c, driver 95%, target wattage of 78w.
IMG_20170314_201939965.jpg IMG_20170314_202003982_HDR.jpg
 

Godfather420

Well-Known Member
Fans are wired up and the covers are on. I am directing the hot are into the canopy to compensate for no IR. I would like to get a higher leaf temp, without raising the room temp.

Curious on your theory here. Why direct heat down, using more power, ran than slowing down an exhaust fan and save power? Not judging, just asking? ; )
 

Godfather420

Well-Known Member
Also, a suggestion... Instead of tucking those fans up into that box tube, surface mount them and put in a divider. The fans won't compete against each other and the fans will get much better flow... But I'm sure you have some rhyme or reason:grin:
 

nevergoodenuf

Well-Known Member
Again I have been told that "you should try are TIM." Well again I am sticking with the one and only Arctic Silver 5. The graphite peel and stick pads, total failure with the B&W holders. And now a new sample I just got. It was close, but just not as good.IMG_20170316_162326304.jpg IMG_20170316_162254470_HDR.jpg
 
Top