HMM.... So there was no wiretapping going on really?

visajoe1

visajoe1

Well-Known Member
dagwood45431 said:
Are you kidding me, dumdum? Watch Colbert tonight to see some laughter! Watch SNL Saturday, Oliver's show on Sunday or just about any comedian talking about Trump over the next few days! Trump (along with you Trump bootlickers) has been comic gold!
Click to expand...
you're right! oh how i forgot. colberts election night special was to die for. did you see it?? tv show hosts are supposed to make people laugh, so not sure if thats the greatest example.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
cool2burn said:
Where is this evidence? I have been waiting for months and for months these "sources" have been saying this crap. So im like put up. Show me evidence or GTFO lol
Click to expand...
Besides Flynn resigning, sessions perjuring himself, manafort stepping down, and nunes running straight to trump?

LULZ

visajoe1 said:
weak dude. gay jokes died like ten years ago? thought you lefties were defenders of lgbtq...
Click to expand...
we fully defend your right to be a bottom.
 
visajoe1

visajoe1

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
LOL

Man that's such a weak reply. The issue of Russian interference with the US presidential election and unexplained contacts with Russian government agents by a candidate's staff if not by Trump himself, is not a partisan issue. At the very least, there has to be a credible investigation into what the Russians did so that we can devise strategy to prevent it the next time. In the course of the investigation, Trump's staff are repeatedly caught lying about their contacting Russian agents. Now, the Congressional lead in the investigation is colluding with the subject of the investigation.

Your laughably inane response is to try to equate one shitty misdeed by Clinton with this issue. It doesn't matter what Clinton did in this case. The only questions being asked here is: What does Trump know and when did he learn it? and What did his campaign staff say to and learn from Russian agents?
Click to expand...
our opinions mean shit, know that. trump as been investigated since last summer, yet nothing found, except "anonymous sources." go to court with that and let me know how it goes. if something was actually found, he would've been popped already. what people need to understand tho, is meeting with someone 1,2, 10 years ago for business, doesnt automatically mean nefarious things are happening. its fine to look, im cool with that, but spreading information about people before we even know what happened isnt fair to them or the country.

the point with clinton has nothing to do with trump and everything to do with you claiming the committee is illegitimate because of nunes. so, then, im asking if you saw no illegitimacy with DOJ and clinton/lynch meeting? you would, understandably, have every reason to question a decision from nunes, as i, and millions of others, did of loretta lynch's decision to meet with bill.
 
dagwood45431

dagwood45431

Well-Known Member
visajoe1 said:
our opinions mean shit, know that. trump as been investigated since last summer, yet nothing found, except "anonymous sources." go to court with that and let me know how it goes. if something was actually found, he would've been popped already. what people need to understand tho, is meeting with someone 1,2, 10 years ago for business, doesnt automatically mean nefarious things are happening. its fine to look, im cool with that, but spreading information about people before we even know what happened isnt fair to them or the country.

the point with clinton has nothing to do with trump and everything to do with you claiming the committee is illegitimate because of nunes. so, then, im asking if you saw no illegitimacy with DOJ and clinton/lynch meeting? you would, understandably, have every reason to question a decision from nunes, as i, and millions of others, did of loretta lynch's decision to meet with bill.
Click to expand...
You just might be dumber than Tampon Timmy.
 
srh88

srh88

Well-Known Member
visajoe1 said:
our opinions mean shit, know that. trump as been investigated since last summer, yet nothing found, except "anonymous sources." go to court with that and let me know how it goes. if something was actually found, he would've been popped already. what people need to understand tho, is meeting with someone 1,2, 10 years ago for business, doesnt automatically mean nefarious things are happening. its fine to look, im cool with that, but spreading information about people before we even know what happened isnt fair to them or the country.

the point with clinton has nothing to do with trump and everything to do with you claiming the committee is illegitimate because of nunes. so, then, im asking if you saw no illegitimacy with DOJ and clinton/lynch meeting? you would, understandably, have every reason to question a decision from nunes, as i, and millions of others, did of loretta lynch's decision to meet with bill.
Click to expand...
 
Big_Lou

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
visajoe1 said:
our opinions mean shit, know that. trump as been investigated since last summer, yet nothing found, except "anonymous sources." go to court with that and let me know how it goes. if something was actually found, he would've been popped already. what people need to understand tho, is meeting with someone 1,2, 10 years ago for business, doesnt automatically mean nefarious things are happening. its fine to look, im cool with that, but spreading information about people before we even know what happened isnt fair to them or the country.

the point with clinton has nothing to do with trump and everything to do with you claiming the committee is illegitimate because of nunes. so, then, im asking if you saw no illegitimacy with DOJ and clinton/lynch meeting? you would, understandably, have every reason to question a decision from nunes, as i, and millions of others, did of loretta lynch's decision to meet with bill.
Click to expand...
1axoz6.jpg

"Alt accounts are not allowed."

"Please don't spam our forum."

Reported.
 
visajoe1

visajoe1

Well-Known Member
dagwood45431 said:
Yes, we know you are ignorant and do not understand that investigating possible collusion with a foreign and unfriendly power to undermine our democracy by nature involves classified information and a complex web of connections that must be unwound and understood. This isn't a Judge Judy episode, you goddamned imbecile.
Click to expand...
which begs the question why surveillance with Flynn's name was classified at low levels and spread as widely as possible within government last year. that isnt typical
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top