CobKits
Well-Known Member
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-17100574
maybe there is hope for landrace cannabis after all
maybe there is hope for landrace cannabis after all
I thought about that briefly, after I posted. I'm thinking in terms of cannabis as a proxy, which isn't fair, since it has had plenty of help from human hands; roses and tomatoes, too.30,000 years is still relatively short in the perspective of things. I'm not saying I disagree. But, if there's no real benefit to change. An organism will practically stay unchanged for as long as is viable.
That is the typical answer of a liar. No links (to primary, peer-reviewed sources) = no argument.I dont need to give u proof, just make your own research and u might arrive to some conclusions.
I was giving u an opportunity to not be embarrassed by your Naturalism and Evolution theories, but since u r too lazy to make research i will give u some hints:That is the typical answer of a liar. No links (to primary, peer-reviewed sources) = no argument.
Let me guess u already have everything figured out, have some respect for God and his creation, even though u dont believe him u shouldnt say that is crap.Mate. I don't know what you think I'll find that will convince me the earth is a whole lot younger than we're being told. But, if it's creationist crap. I'm not interested.
I will not discuss articles of faith with an illiterate with a religious axe to grind. If you "do your research" and restrict yourself to the "teachings" of people compelled by the very same weaponized meme as you: "this is the TRUTH and any idea that opposes it is to be eradicated as Evil" you will of course never be exposed to Wrong Ideas. Be honest about your being utterly uninterested in discourse. You're preaching and not even admitting it. That says something utterly condemning about the basic mindset your war-meme demands of you: one of deliberate rejection of plain fact. The above unreferenced* word salad, heavily garnished with fallacious logic, demonstrates the point to those with eyes to see and ears to hear.I was giving u an opportunity to not be embarrassed by your Naturalism and Evolution theories, but since u r too lazy to make research i will give u some hints:
-There r none Fossils records from the transitions between species, there should be as much as fossils from the actual species
-Latest Dna tests have shown that apes have the double of Y chromosome than men, and generally apes and men chromosomes r remarkably divergent and too different for the ape to man evolution
- The Law of Biogenesis (the Law of Life Beginnings) accurately states that life only comes from life, and that life only reproduces after its own kind. Life cannot spontaneously generate and life forms do not change from one kind into another kind
-How can u explain symbiosis ( like the bee/flower relation, they need each other to survive)?
-Where r the "missing links"?
-If we came from apes why they still exist today?
And the list goes on and on...