Johnny Lawrence
Well-Known Member
I'm bored on a Sunday afternoon. Link to thread please?
He presents himself as an expert and tries to come across as a good dude so people don't question his stupidity.Hey @RM3, After reading more of your threads I can tell that you are a good dude, still unsure about "drowning the bitch" lol
http://forum.howtogrowmarijuana.com/grow-diaries/33653-breakin-all-the-rulesI'm bored on a Sunday afternoon. Link to thread please?
Wow. How is it that nobody on that forum even bothered to question his methods?http://forum.howtogrowmarijuana.com/grow-diaries/33653-breakin-all-the-rules
"I use T5 HO lights for both veg and flower, I have never owned a carbon scrubber because my garden never stinks unless there is something wrong and that is very rare. My garden is a 5 X 5 area with 1000 watts (16 bulbs) of T5 mixed spectrum lighting in a fully open 500 sq ft room (basement) I use Chem nutes from JR Peters, Jack's Citrus FeED and Jack's AquaGold and DynaGro's ProtK (silica) for Cal/Mag I use gypsum and Epsom (Calcium Sulfate & Magnesium Sulfate) instead of flushing at the end I hit em with Potassium Sulfate."
Writing books about a 5x5.
It seemed very convincing at first, but the problem is that they argue that it doesn't matter if it burns clean or has thick black chunky ashes. That part really made me question everythingHe presents himself as an expert and tries to come across as a good dude so people don't question his stupidity.
He's just trying to help after all....
RM3 needs to get a job at Greenhouse cause they are the same level of scum IMO.
http://forum.howtogrowmarijuana.com/grow-diaries/33653-breakin-all-the-rules
"I use T5 HO lights for both veg and flower, I have never owned a carbon scrubber because my garden never stinks unless there is something wrong and that is very rare. My garden is a 5 X 5 area with 1000 watts (16 bulbs) of T5 mixed spectrum lighting in a fully open 500 sq ft room (basement) I use Chem nutes from JR Peters, Jack's Citrus FeED and Jack's AquaGold and DynaGro's ProtK (silica) for Cal/Mag I use gypsum and Epsom (Calcium Sulfate & Magnesium Sulfate) instead of flushing at the end I hit em with Potassium Sulfate."
Writing books about a 5x5.
LOL well ya, hence the name changes lol. Lots question him but he's gotten less combative (code word for douche Like) with the last change. I have to admit that some of the stuff he says is relivent but yes lots is pretty controversial and as for his business model ..... well I think he's a bit hypocritical. Anywhoooo I don't discount anything from anyone until I try it myself and even then it's really just a plant so it's all good .Wow. How is it that nobody on that forum even bothered to question his methods?
Well I'm not sure if it was described as exceptional, if I recall, and I could be wrong, I think it was more of "its good" but yes it sure looks nice. The thing is he used the words "could the best in the world" as reviewed by others. That's a pretty lofty statement lol. I do agree that it's all about what works for you.I enjoy reading RM3's methods and reasoning.
People trying and experimenting with different ideas is what makes growing interesting. It also makes threads enjoyable to read and creates debates. Be very boring if we all used the same light the same medium and the same everyfknthing.
In regard to the "dig" at his lighting. Lots prefer T5's. Just like every type of lighting it has its pros and cons. One thing i dont like about this forum is the assumption that the lighting that they choose to use is the best. The best lighting is the one best suited to you.
On of my must respected Forum friends on here and his friend (both well known growers on this forum) have visited him and have said RM3s herb is exceptional as have others. What he does , whilst strange to some must work for him. And aint that what its about?
Maybe they didn't use the word exceptional but they were impressed neverthelessWell I'm not sure if it was described as exceptional, if I recall, and I could be wrong, I think it was more of "its good" but yes it sure looks nice. The thing is he used the words "could the best in the world" as reviewed by others. That's a pretty lofty statement lol. I do agree that it's all about what works for you.
No. Just, no. T5s have their place in the veg room, but anybody trying to use them for flowering is going ass backwards. It just doesn't make sense. Aside from CFLs(again, another florescent), they are literally the worst option you could choose for a flowering room. That's a fact - not an opinion. The only pro to T5s would be in limited head space situations, and in this realm QBs and softly run cobs shit all over florescents. Those are facts, not opinions.In regard to the "dig" at his lighting. Lots prefer T5's. Just like every type of lighting it has its pros and cons. One thing i dont like about this forum is the assumption that the lighting that they choose to use is the best. The best lighting is the one best suited to you.
So your agreeing with me? They, like all lighting options have their place.. T5s have their place i
The guy we are talking about is using T5s for flowering. I clearly stated that they have their place in a veg room, which you conveniently cut off when quoting me. T5s in a flowering rooms are just dumb.So your agreeing with me? They, like all lighting options have their place.
Im not gunna argue pros and cons of all lighting on this thread..tis all been done before.
Yeah, sure. If you want to chop off the end of my sentence and use it out of context.So your agreeing with me?
But yet people use them and get good results..so who gives a fk.The guy we are talking about is using T5s for flowering. I clearly stated that they have their place in a veg room, which you conveniently cut off when quoting me. T5s in a flowering rooms are just dumb.
well,,u kinda took my comment and agreed with it and then rambled some and started arguing the benefits of one type of lighting over another...I think every reg forum member here knows RM3 uses T5 in flower. Its a cool lookin setup to.Yeah, sure. If you want to chop off the end of my sentence and use it out of context.
Nice work.
well,,u kinda took my comment and agreed with it and then rambled some and started arguing the benefits of one type of lighting over another...I think every reg forum member here knows RM3 uses T5 in flower. Its a cool lookin setup to.
People DO use CFLs and get good flower.
People DO use T5s and get good flower.
People Do use LED and get good flower.
People DO use HID and get good flower.
People DO use the SUN and get good flower.
It works for them so good luck to em.
I say again. If everybody grew with the same lights and medium and the same everyfknthing it would be pretty boring.
even then it's really just a plant...