Random Jabber Jibber thread

ovo

Well-Known Member
I am not implying a threat ... if you can detail where I did so, do that.

You do need to be a regular here to know who is singing what without the libretto. I am one such, and you are free to disagree with my perceptions.

However you are giving aid and succor to a warsock. I think you need to know that.
Warsock, ha I like that term.

When you asked me if I was part of the problem, or the solution, that sounded much like the cliche- it's my way or the hiway. Maybe it wasn't a veiled threat. I'll observe if your self-proclaimed solution is effective. You seem to believe "the solution" is more than an excuse to scuffle with noobs.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Warsock, ha I like that term.

When you asked me if I was part of the problem, or the solution, that sounded much like the cliche- it's my way or the hiway. Maybe it wasn't a veiled threat. I'll observe if your self-proclaimed solution is effective. You seem to believe "the solution" is more than an excuse to scuffle with noobs.
Thank you for that; i intended no threat ... testing my solution for function is the scientific method. I tip my hat.

Also, is an account open since 2010 a noob? By what measure?
 

lokie

Well-Known Member
~snip~

But i think you take this whole forum/internet thing a bit to serious, no?
~snip~
This will be the only time i explain myself to you because i felt as if you mightve deserved it. But after this, if you dont believe me i guess thats on you. ~snip~
That sounds serious.

This is TNT. Now that you are aware of the no holes bared rules jump in and play or just
slowly back away.




P.S.

How many dix fit in your mouth?

 

ovo

Well-Known Member
Also, is an account open since 2010 a noob? By what measure?
Yes. If someone had an inactive account for a long time and then finally shows up to participate. I wouldn't call that person a liar for saying they are new. Semantics become a trap.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Yes. If someone had an inactive account for a long time and then finally shows up to participate. I wouldn't call that person a liar for saying they are new. Semantics become a trap.
I agree that that by itself is not conclusive. It is worth considering though that "mainliner", the other leading sock spawner, has admitted to making many accounts over the years. Thus a newb with an old account deserves scrutiny. Scrutiny is not condemnation; notice my interactions with Dr. Botany in the same interval.

My response to this "new" user comes from my noticing some unique tells used by a known liar and general-duty scumbag who posts here under another username.

I am calling Johnei a liar because I have watched him lie, today, in just the one account.
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
Well, thank you for your straight answer, very appreciated

But i think you take this whole forum/internet thing a bit to serious, no?
You can honestly think whatever, my man
Buuut, this is my first week, not on the internet?, but on these forums. The only other times i been on here, was for my past newbie questions, that i types into GOOGLE and RUI pops up. But other than that i never signed up for these websites.
This will be the only time i explain myself to you because i felt as if you mightve deserved it. But after this, if you dont believe me i guess thats on you. I would, however, like to create a cannabis growing relation with not only you but everyone without being accused of something i have no knowledge about.

I accused you of being mainy in another thread in the last 48 hours. I was just looking for your first posts in TNT that indicated that mainy style, but the thread was deleted. Both your posts and my accusation. Since I cannot empirically show my evidence at this time, I'll be cool and give you a pass. I'm watching you, though, doctor. Hope I'm wrong, but that rarely happens. Carry on for now...
 
Top