Quantum Theory Demonstrated: Observation Affects Reality

VegasWinner

Well-Known Member
REHOVOT, Israel, February 26, 1998--One of the most bizarre premises of quantum theory, which has long fascinated philosophers and physicists alike, states that by the very act of watching, the observer affects the observed reality.

In a study reported in the February 26 issue of Nature (Vol. 391, pp. 871-874), researchers at the Weizmann Institute of Science have now conducted a highly controlled experiment demonstrating how a beam of electrons is affected by the act of being observed. The experiment revealed that the greater the amount of "watching," the greater the observer's influence on what actually takes place.

The research team headed by Prof. Mordehai Heiblum, included Ph.D. student Eyal Buks, Dr. Ralph Schuster, Dr. Diana Mahalu and Dr. Vladimir Umansky. The scientists, members of the Condensed Matter Physics Department, work at the Institute's Joseph H. and Belle R. Braun Center for Submicron Research.

When a quantum "observer" is watching Quantum mechanics states that particles can also behave as waves. This can be true for electrons at the submicron level, i.e., at distances measuring less than one micron, or one thousandth of a millimeter. When behaving as waves, they can simultaneously pass through several openings in a barrier and then meet again at the other side of the barrier. This "meeting" is known as interference.

Strange as it may sound, interference can only occur when no one is watching. Once an observer begins to watch the particles going through the openings, the picture changes dramatically: if a particle can be seen going through one opening, then it's clear it didn't go through another. In other words, when under observation, electrons are being "forced" to behave like particles and not like waves. Thus the mere act of observation affects the experimental findings.

To demonstrate this, Weizmann Institute researchers built a tiny device measuring less than one micron in size, which had a barrier with two openings. They then sent a current of electrons towards the barrier. The "observer" in this experiment wasn't human. Institute scientists used for this purpose a tiny but sophisticated electronic detector that can spot passing electrons. The quantum "observer's" capacity to detect electrons could be altered by changing its electrical conductivity, or the strength of the current passing through it.

Apart from "observing," or detecting, the electrons, the detector had no effect on the current. Yet the scientists found that the very presence of the detector-"observer" near one of the openings caused changes in the interference pattern of the electron waves passing through the openings of the barrier. In fact, this effect was dependent on the "amount" of the observation: when the "observer's" capacity to detect electrons increased, in other words, when the level of the observation went up, the interference weakened; in contrast, when its capacity to detect electrons was reduced, in other words, when the observation slackened, the interference increased.

Thus, by controlling the properties of the quantum observer the scientists managed to control the extent of its influence on the electrons' behavior. The theoretical basis for this phenomenon was developed several years ago by a number of physicists, including Dr. Adi Stern and Prof. Yoseph Imry of the Weizmann Institute of Science, together with Prof. Yakir Aharonov of Tel Aviv University. The new experimental work was initiated following discussions with Weizmann Institute's Prof. Shmuel Gurvitz, and its results have already attracted the interest of theoretical physicists around the world and are being studied, among others, by Prof. Yehoshua Levinson of the Weizmann Institute.

Tomorrow's Technology

The experiment's finding that observation tends to kill interference may be used in tomorrow's technology to ensure the secrecy of information transfer. This can be accomplished if information is encoded in such a way that the interference of multiple electron paths is needed to decipher it. "The presence of an eavesdropper, who is an observer, although an unwanted one, would kill the interference," says Prof. Heiblum. "This would let the recipient know that the message has been intercepted."

On a broader scale, the Weizmann Institute experiment is an important contribution to the scientific community's efforts aimed at developing quantum electronic machines, which may become a reality in the next century. This radically new type of electronic equipment may exploit both the particle and wave nature of electrons at the same time and a greater understanding of the interplay between these two characteristics are needed for the development of this equipment. Such future technology may, for example, open the way to the development of new computers whose capacity will vastly exceed that of today's most advanced machines.

This research was funded in part by the Minerva Foundation, Munich, Germany. Prof. Imry holds the Max Planck Chair of Quantum Physics and heads the Albert Einstein Minerva Center for Theoretical Physics.

The Weizmann Institute of Science, in Rehovot, Israel, is one of the world's foremost centers of scientific research and graduate study. Its 2,400 scientists, students, technicians, and engineers pursue basic research in the quest for knowledge and the enhancement of the human condition. New ways of fighting disease and hunger, protecting the environment, and harnessing alternative sources of energy are high priorities.

Story Source:

Materials provided by Weizmann Institute Of Science. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/02/980227055013.htm

 

VegasWinner

Well-Known Member
The Double-Slit Experiment That Blew Open Quantum Mechanics
The physics equations you learned in school don't work on the atomic scale. We have Newtonian physics to explain the world we can see and feel, and we have Einsteinian physics to explain the behavior of matter and light in the universe, but we observe a bunch of bizarre phenomena on the atomic scale that we can't explain fully yet with equations and mathematical laws.

Perhaps the two most perplexing behaviors of atomic particles are quantum superposition (particles can exist in two separate places simultaneously) and quantum entanglement (particles separated by large distances can react to one another instantaneously, suggesting information can travel faster than the speed of light, although there are other explanations for this phenomenon as well).

The experiment that started physicists down the path to discovering the wonderfully spooky behaviors of atomic particles is called the double-slit experiment. We know that light travels in waves, and when those waves pass through two parallel slits, a single wave gets separated into two waves that run into each other. PBS's Space Time series has a great new video explaining the double-slit experiment.

When we shoot two waves of light through a double slit, they form a pattern based on the way their peaks and troughs match up or clash. When we shoot a single photon through, we'd expect it to just go through unchanged. But it won't. When you shoot enough single photons through—one at a time, alternating slits—they form the same interference pattern as the waves of light. Basically, that means that all the possible paths of these particles can interfere with each other, even though only one of the possible paths actually happens. Mind blown?

We can't fully explain these phenomena yet, but we can observe them. (The video above runs through some of the leading theories for these odd quantum behaviors. It's trippy stuff.) It is only a matter of time before someone comes up with the correct mathematical equations to fully predict and model these events, and when they do, the third major set of physical laws will be born.
 

VegasWinner

Well-Known Member
All this testing of lights by the person selling the lights is really bogus. Science proves this to be true. It is no coincidence that everyone argues about light and go figure, the science of obsertving olight experiments is effected by the observer. The observer always gets what the subconsciously want, the data to support their argument.
namaste
 

CannaBruh

Well-Known Member
"when introduced, some load on an experiment had some effect which differs than when the load was removed or not present"

Without being cynical it's hard to agree with your statement about testing. If what you offer is true, anybody in any field who does any testing of their product, the resulting tests would have to be considered "really bogus"
 

jonsnow399

Well-Known Member
The Double-Slit Experiment That Blew Open Quantum Mechanics
The physics equations you learned in school don't work on the atomic scale. We have Newtonian physics to explain the world we can see and feel, and we have Einsteinian physics to explain the behavior of matter and light in the universe, but we observe a bunch of bizarre phenomena on the atomic scale that we can't explain fully yet with equations and mathematical laws.

Perhaps the two most perplexing behaviors of atomic particles are quantum superposition (particles can exist in two separate places simultaneously) and quantum entanglement (particles separated by large distances can react to one another instantaneously, suggesting information can travel faster than the speed of light, although there are other explanations for this phenomenon as well).

The experiment that started physicists down the path to discovering the wonderfully spooky behaviors of atomic particles is called the double-slit experiment. We know that light travels in waves, and when those waves pass through two parallel slits, a single wave gets separated into two waves that run into each other. PBS's Space Time series has a great new video explaining the double-slit experiment.

When we shoot two waves of light through a double slit, they form a pattern based on the way their peaks and troughs match up or clash. When we shoot a single photon through, we'd expect it to just go through unchanged. But it won't. When you shoot enough single photons through—one at a time, alternating slits—they form the same interference pattern as the waves of light. Basically, that means that all the possible paths of these particles can interfere with each other, even though only one of the possible paths actually happens. Mind blown?

We can't fully explain these phenomena yet, but we can observe them. (The video above runs through some of the leading theories for these odd quantum behaviors. It's trippy stuff.) It is only a matter of time before someone comes up with the correct mathematical equations to fully predict and model these events, and when they do, the third major set of physical laws will be born.
What is ironic is that Einstein had to fight for years to get his relativity theory accepted, then he spent the latter part of his life trying to disprove quantum mechanics.
 

chemphlegm

Well-Known Member
My plants behave very differently when I dont observe them for a few days compared to daily observation.
Time appears to occur slower while being measured and observed.
something about staring into a mirror I dunno but with an old ufo led light in the game room..... everything is different.
 

chemphlegm

Well-Known Member
All this testing of lights by the person selling the lights is really bogus. Science proves this to be true. It is no coincidence that everyone argues about light and go figure, the science of obsertving olight experiments is effected by the observer. The observer always gets what the subconsciously want, the data to support their argument.
namaste

it might seem life is like that too. at any different point we all have what we've settled for. We think, we manifest and create what we think we want and often get just that. be careful what you wish for, lest it come true-the monkey paw
 

dagwood45431

Well-Known Member
it might seem life is like that too. at any different point we all have what we've settled for. We think, we manifest and create what we think we want and often get just that. be careful what you wish for, lest it come true-the monkey paw
Sure, but let's not pretend any of that has anything to do with quantum theory.
 

VegasWinner

Well-Known Member
"when introduced, some load on an experiment had some effect which differs than when the load was removed or not present"

Without being cynical it's hard to agree with your statement about testing. If what you offer is true, anybody in any field who does any testing of their product, the resulting tests would have to be considered "really bogus"
My personal observation and outcome mine is not yours. Make your own personal observation and outcomes.
 

VegasWinner

Well-Known Member
What is ironic is that Einstein had to fight for years to get his relativity theory accepted, then he spent the latter part of his life trying to disprove quantum mechanics.
Science has proven a lot since Einstein started the whole process of questioning his own beliefs and expected outcomes
 

VegasWinner

Well-Known Member
it might seem life is like that too. at any different point we all have what we've settled for. We think, we manifest and create what we think we want and often get just that. be careful what you wish for, lest it come true-the monkey paw
Best observation I have seen so far and I like it too
 

MasterpieceNutes

Well-Known Member
One of the most interesting parts of the observation phenomenon is that it is unaffected by time.. They used solar lensing in a celestial sized double gate experiment and were affecting photon measurements that should have taken decades to relate. Quite literally the photon state which was affected 40 light years away had real time readings. Perplexing.
 
Top