i want to run 4x4 sog and i was thinking about 20 cobs 3590 running on 0.7 ampi guess it would depend on your space or needs, could also look in to quantum boards lots of threads in the forums here
Better take some Luminus CXM22, they are half the price of a CXB and have better effiency.i want to run 4x4 sog and i was thinking about 20 cobs 3590 running on 0.7 amp
is the quantum boards better?
like i said price dosent matter i need the bestBetter take some Luminus CXM22, they are half the price of a CXB and have better effiency.
Ask @CobKits for more info, he is a very good source for quality COB's.
Quantumboards are up to 50-60% efficient, you need ~4 CXB3590, driven @1050mA(~150w) to reach the same effiency range.
You can replace the 4 CXB3590 also with 4 Citi 1212C4 gen.6 for ⅓ the price or take 3 CXM22.
@CobKits has made an own thread about COB vs. QB comparisions.
Best, or better, most powerful chips to date are probably Citizen 1825 and 3618 or Luminus CXM32, but at least 40$ per chip(1825)!
i was thinking about running 20 cxb 3590 on 4x4 tent16 cobs in a 4x4 would be great and quite a bit less expensive.
I run mine on 4x 200W drivers and when they are flat-out, I'm at the highest end of the necessary light intensity. Sounds like you have done your sums though, because with 'only' 16 cobs, I'm running at the slightly less efficient 1400mA
For what it's worth, my new fixture (building it right now) is using 16x Vero 29s , which are cheaper, potentially more powerful and capable of being slightly more efficient at low amps. This new set of 16 on 4x400W drivers will be more flexible and will light up a 4x4 with massive efficiency (they are 70v cobs and the drivers 1Amp, dimmable) and be expandable up to 4x8 (I hope), lighting up either space at around 50Watts/sq ft.
I use bars of 4 which can be spread wide or close, on simple rails, which is what delivers the flexibility.
nobody has an actual measurement to back that number up but we do know relative performance from cob to cob in repeatable measurements.like i said price dosent matter i need the best
isnt the cxb are 64% efficient at 700ma?
but the 20 3590 will only drew 500W and the vero will drew 600WVero29 B's for ~20$ are hard to beat value : performance :quality. At ~50w each will give you 2.2µmols/w(system level with most drivers). Using 12 on (2) HLG320h-c1050's will save you on chips and still be the same efficiency as (20) 3590. This is based on sphere and gonio data of completed fixtures by certified labs(Light laboratory, TUV, CSA), not spec sheets.
Can't fit C's on a HLG-600.are you guys using Bs in your new fixtures i assumed they were Cs
wiggle room? sorry im not the best in ensligh...I know what you mean about the 2KW limit.
Do you plan to be flowering the whole set-up at the same stage - ie 4x (4x4) all starting their 8-10 weeks on the same day?
The reason I ask is, I blasted mine with over 700W towards the end of flowering and it didn't seem too much but, earlier on in the cycle, half that would have been plenty. You may have a bit of wiggle-room.
thx for the info ill look about this ledThe closer any led comes to filling the McCree Curve the better the result/ AFAIK, Amare Technologies is the only commercial company focused on doing whatever it takes to fill in the difference from COBs alone. Been using them for years. Before AT came along (~ 5 years ago) I collaborated with Nick (then BML) to design a SPYDR 600 that would work well for both veg and bloom. It is a mix of CW/N/W/WW plus mono 450/630s, essentially infilling the whites to the McCree curve. Either 2 AT P3 r P4s would kill in a 4 x 4.. RIU members get a nice discount, too