Donald Trump threatens 'fury' against N Korea ..(again)

Heil Tweetler

Heil Tweetler

Well-Known Member
It’s a good thing my bone spurs cleared up. Bone spurs are very painful, honestly, and bone spurs are a disgrace. They send a sharp pain through one of your feet—I can’t remember which one—and they always strike right when you’d otherwise be eligible for military service. Sad!
QtrNdaPuss said:
and the dems don't have a candidate that can beat him in the next election. what a sad sad group
Click to expand...
Clegg-Trump-Imagines-Life-As-a-Soldier.jpg
Nothing is sadder than this fucking heinous sham of a POTUS
 
Last edited:
Gquebed

Gquebed

Well-Known Member
And there it is... a report on MSN saying that China will remain neutral if NK fires the first shot.

But if the US attacks first China will intervene.

In other words... China says shut the fuck up Trump.
 
dagwood45431

dagwood45431

Well-Known Member
Gquebed said:
And there it is... a report on MSN saying that China will remain neutral if NK fires the first shot.

But if the US attacks first China will intervene.

In other words... China says shut the fuck up Trump.
Click to expand...
The only possible news there is that China would remain neutral if NK attacks first. China's position on NK is every bit as absolute as ours is on SK. Given that, Trump does need to shut the fuck up. He's playing into the hands of a second despotic ruler in less than eight months. He's so fucking stupid.
 
Gquebed

Gquebed

Well-Known Member
dagwood45431 said:
The only possible news there is that China would remain neutral if NK attacks first. China's position on NK is every bit as absolute as ours is on SK. Given that, Trump does need to shut the fuck up. He's playing into the hands of a second despotic ruler in less than eight months. He's so fucking stupid.
Click to expand...
Exactly....

Actually... this is more like a parent slapping down a couple kids to keep them from squabbling over nothing.
 
mauricem00

mauricem00

Well-Known Member
vostok said:
US President Donald Trump says North Korea "will be met with fire and fury" if it threatens the US.

His comments came after a Washington Post report, citing US intelligence officials,

said Pyongyang had produced a nuclear warhead small enough to fit inside its missiles.

This would mean the North is developing nuclear weapons capable of striking

the US at a much faster rate than expected.

The UN recently approved further economic sanctions against the country.

The Security Council unanimously agreed to ban North Korean exports and

limit investments, prompting fury from North Korea and a vow to make the "US pay a price".

The heated rhetoric between the two leaders intensified after Pyongyang tested

two intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) in July, claiming it now had the ability to hit the US.

Mr Trump told reporters on Tuesday: "North Korea best not make any more threats to the US.

They will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen."

Analysis: Words with consequences?
Anthony Zurcher, BBC News, Washington:
Donald Trump said that North Korean leader Kim Jong-un "has been very threatful,
'beyond a normal state". So he responded with language that goes well beyond
a normal statement for any US president.

Perhaps Mr Trump believes that no hyperbolic threats should go unmatched or that
apocalyptic warnings are the only ones the North Korean leadership will understand.
Perhaps he - intentionally or not - is pursuing a Nixonian "madman" style foreign policy,
where adversaries will tread lightly to avoid triggering the wrath
of an unpredictable US commander-in-chief.

When the leader of the world's greatest superpower, the only nation ever to have used
nuclear weapons on an enemy, talks of unprecedented "fire and fury",
however, those words have consequences.

During his presidential campaign Mr Trump criticised his predecessor Barack Obama
for not enforcing a red line against Syria's use of chemical weapons.
Now President Trump has drawn a fiery bright line of his own with North Korea -
one that could commit the US to a perilous course of action if his words go unheeded.

The Washington Post quoted an intelligence community report as saying it

"assesses North Korea has produced nuclear weapons for ballistic missile delivery,

to include delivery by ICBM-class missiles".

It has previously been thought that the North was still years away from being able to

fire a nuclear weapon, although it has long carried out separate nuclear tests and missile launches.

North Korea said on Monday, two days after the UN sanctions were passed, that it would continue

with its nuclear weapons programme.

The state-run KCNA news agency said Pyongyang would "not put our self-defensive

nuclear deterrent on the negotiating table" while it faces threats from the US.

It threatened to make the US "pay the price for its crime... thousands of times,"

referring to America's role in drafting the UN sanctions resolution.


http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40869319
Click to expand...
this sounds like the same kind of foolishness that caused pearl harbor and our war with japan. not a good ideal to back a man with nuclear missiles into a corner and assume he won't fight
 
Gquebed

Gquebed

Well-Known Member
DrUgZrBaD said:
remember who payed for your bridges,roads,schools and your olympic stadium to house those haitians. it wasnt you......
Click to expand...
If you could read then you would know i was answering a question with that post...to say, no i am not from quebec, i am albertan...

And if you were not a moron you would know that no, alberta's transfer payments to the canadian federal government did not pay for quebecs roads and stadium and shit like that.

I know we albertans like to think that our oil pays everybody's elses bills in this country but it just isnt true....

Back to school for you buddy and go learn what the transfer payments are and how they work...
 
tampee

tampee

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
how sad were you when you got banned last time?

and why was your brother sent to prison after being questioned for child molestation?
Click to expand...
I was actually happy about the ban.

And my brother was never questioned about child molestation. He was charged with 1rst degree assualt, drugs and a few other things.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
View attachment 3993004
The gray line is income distribution before 1980 and the red is after.

Since one can be sure that loudmouth is not a member of the one percent, it's pretty obvious he's part of those getting fucked as opposed to those doing it.[/QUOTE]
Source for that

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/08/07/opinion/leonhardt-income-inequality.html

Scroll down a few lines and an interactive graph shows when the hockey stick for income growth appears. It appears at the very beginning of the Bush Jr administration. Has some ups and downs after that but the general result after 2001 is the one shown in your graphic. Bush era tax cuts have to be repealed at the very least.
 
tampee

tampee

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
tammy duckworth.

al franken.

kamala harris.

a dog with three legs.

a sack of rotten pineapples melting int he sun.

herpes.

all would win out over trump, you racist pussy sycophant.
Click to expand...
They won't beat Trump his popularity is going to go through the roof once we destroy North Korea quicker than Desert Storm.
 
JCS57

JCS57

Well-Known Member
I'm no expert on military planning or execution but if I was NK I'd roll all my nukes up to the DMZ set with dead man switch and wait for the orange primate to show his hand. Then China would be looking at a major radioactive fallout catastrophe if the nukes were to go off thus forcing them to intervene.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top